Assessment 2 Instructions: A Right to Experimental Drugs?

Assessment 2 Instructions: A Right to Experimental Drugs?

  • Write a 2-3 page paper that explains and defends your view on the issue of whether or not patients with no other treatment options have a moral right to unproven drugs.
    Introduction
    Many doctors, nurses, medical technicians, and other health care workers are involved in medical research. The field of medicine is not limited to the direct treatment of patients but also involves the continued expansion of medical research. A large part of such research is clinical research, which puts patients into the role of experimental subjects. This raises a number of challenging questions for health care ethics, many of which follow from the fact that physicians, nurses, and others involved in clinical research have a dual role. As researchers, they are committed to generating new knowledge about diseases, developing new treatments and drug therapies, and, in general, helping to improve the welfare of human beings by eliminating or controlling diseases and increasing longevity. However, researchers involved in clinical research must also be committed to the highest quality care for individual patients taking part in research studies. This assessment explores some of the ethical issues that clinical research raises and some of the safeguards in place to protect the interests of patients involved in research.
    Demonstration of Proficiency
    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

    • Competency 1: Articulate ethical issues in health care.
      • Explain how the principle of informed consent is relevant to these issues.
      • Explain the costs and benefits of offering unapproved experimental drugs to patients.
    • Competency 2: Apply sound ethical thinking related to a health care issue.
      • Identify relevant ethical theories and moral principles.
      • Articulate arguments using examples for and against offering pre-approved drugs to wider pools of patients.
    • Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with health care professionals.
      • Exhibit proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills.
    • Preparation
      When a new drug is undergoing clinical trials to be approved for treatment, it must pass through a number of distinct phases of testing. These phases require rigorous study and evidence to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of new treatments. Passing through these phases and achieving approval takes many years for some trials. Before approval, patients not part of a clinical trial have limited or no access to experimental drugs, even though these drugs could be helpful and potentially save their lives. There are various groups pushing for greater patient access to drugs still in the experimental stage. In recent years, the FDA has made it somewhat easier to receive treatment with experimental drugs, but according to advocacy groups there are still too many restrictions (Munson, 2014).
      This leads to a potential quandary when early stages of research on a drug sometimes suggest that the drug could be effective in treating a certain disease. On one hand, offering easier access to early stage trial drugs could help individuals suffering with a medical condition. However, on the other hand, making early access to experimental drugs easier could limit the pool of patients available to participate in clinical trials that establish whether or not the drug is truly effective and safe. This is an important consideration, as the vast majority of experimental drugs turn out to be completely ineffective or could have very dangerous side effects that will only show up over time and across a wider test population.
      When completing this assessment, it is important to keep in mind the ethical arguments that are relevant to both views regarding the right to experimental drugs. It may be useful to review the suggested resources and conduct additional independent research while you are planning your assessment submission.
      Instructions
      Do patients with no other treatment options have a moral right to unproven drugs? Write a paper that explains and defends your view on this issue. In addition to reviewing the suggested resources, you are encouraged to locate additional resources in the Capella library, your public library, or authoritative online sites to provide additional support for your viewpoint. Be sure to weave and cite the resources throughout your work. In your paper, address the following points:
    • Identify relevant ethical theories and moral principles.
    • Explain how the principle of informed consent is relevant to the issue.
    • Explain the costs and benefits of making unproven, unapproved experimental drugs widely available to patients. Consider the costs and benefits not only to the individual patients who take these drugs but also potential costs and benefits to other patients.
    • Explain arguments using examples for and against offering pre-approved drugs to wider pools of patients.
    • Support your view using ethical theories or moral principles (or both) that you find most relevant to the issue.
    • Additional Requirements
    • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines.
    • Length: 2–3 typed, double-spaced pages.
    • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
    • Reference
      Munson, R. (2014). Intervention and reflection: Basic issues in bioethics (concise ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
  • SCORING GUIDE
    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
    VIEW SCORING GUIDE

Assessment 3 Instructions: Should We Withhold Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case

Assessment 3 Instructions: Should We Withhold Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case

  • Write a 2-3 page paper that examines the moral and ethical issues involved in making a decision regarding limiting life support.
    End-of-Life Issues
    With our framework of ethical theories and principles in hand, we begin our look at some of the critical ethical issues in our contemporary world, starting with end-of-life issues. This assessment covers ethical questions related to end-of-life care. Passive euthanasia is the removal or refusal of life-sustaining treatment. Examples of passive euthanasia include removal of a feeding tube or a ventilator, or forgoing a life-prolonging surgery. Passive euthanasia is legal in all 50 states, and the principle of autonomy gives informed patients the right to refuse any and all treatments. Patients who are unable to make such decisions in the moment (because they are unconscious, for example) might have made their intentions clear beforehand with an advance directive or similar document. Things become more complicated, however, when a patient who is unable to make treatment choices has not made his or her wishes clear, either formally in a written document, or informally in conversations with family members or friends. Another problem concerns cases in which there is disagreement about whether the treatment is sustaining the life of a person in the full sense or merely as a body that, because of severe and irreversible brain trauma, is no longer truly a living person.
    Active euthanasia, or assisted suicide, introduces further difficult moral questions. A patient who has a terminal illness and who has refused treatments that would merely prolong a potentially very painful and debilitating death might want the process of dying to be hastened and made less painful. The patient might want to take his or her own life before the disease reaches its horrible final stages. Should patients be legally allowed to have help in this endeavor? If suicide itself is not morally wrong, at least in cases like these, is it wrong for another person to directly help bring about the patient’s death? Is it wrong for doctors, a role we naturally associate with healing and the promotion of life, to use their medical expertise to deliberately end a patient’s life if the patient wants this?
    Demonstration of Proficiency
    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

    • Competency 1: Articulate ethical issues in health care.
      • Articulate the moral issues associated with limiting life support.
    • Competency 2: Apply sound ethical thinking related to a health care issue.
      • Demonstrate sound ethical thinking and relevant ethical principles when considering limiting life support.
      • Explain important considerations that arise when contemplating limiting life support.
    • Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with health care professionals.
      • Exhibit proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills.
    • Preparation
    • Case Study: Mr. Martinez.
    • This media piece provides the context for this assessment; make sure you have reviewed the case study thoroughly.
      Additionally, it may be useful to think through the following issues as they relate to Mr. Martinez’s case:
    • Should Mr. Martinez be transferred to intensive care, where his respiratory failure can be treated by a ventilator, and by CPR if necessary, and his oxygen level can be monitored?
      • What are the key ethical issues or models at play in this case study?
      • What are the key end-of-life issues at play in this case study?
      • How can an understanding of models and best-practice help to guide health care practitioners to make ethical and legal decisions?
    • Instructions
      In a 2–3 page analysis of the case study, address the following:
    • The patient’s directives.
    • The patient’s quality of life.
    • The family’s stated preferences.
    • The moral issues associated with limiting life support.
    • The ethical principles most relevant to reaching an ethically sound decision.
    • Important considerations such as implications, justifications, and any conflicts of interest that might arise because of the patient’s respiratory failure.
    • When writing your assessment submission assume that doctors cannot contact Mrs. Martinez and must make this choice on their own. To help you reach an objective, ethically sound decision, draw upon concepts and arguments from the suggested resources or your independent research. Support your response with clear, concise, and correct examples, weaving and citing the readings and media throughout your answer.
      Submission Requirements
    • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines.
    • Length: 2–3 typed, double-spaced pages.
    • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
  • SCORING GUIDE
    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
    VIEW SCORING GUIDE

Assessment 4 Instructions: Robbing the Dead: Is Organ Conscription Ethical?

Assessment 4 Instructions: Robbing the Dead: Is Organ Conscription Ethical?

  • Write a 2-3 page paper that examines the moral and ethical considerations of organ conscription policies and theories.
    Scarcity of Medical Resources
    For this assessment, you will continue your survey of ethical principles in health care. Especially in our contemporary world, where needs for health care outstrip available resources, we regularly face decisions about who should get which resources.
    There is a serious shortage of donor organs. Need vastly outstrips supply, due not only to medical advances related to organ transplantation, but also because not enough people consent to be cadaveric donors (an organ donor who has already died). Munson (2014) points out that in the United States, approximately 10,000 patients die each year because an organ donor was not available, which is three times the number of people killed in the terrorist attacks on 9/11.
    But what is an efficient and morally sound solution to this problem? The policy of presumed consent, where enacted, has scarcely increased supply, and other alternatives, such as allowing donors to sell their organs, raise strong moral objections. In light of this, some have advocated for a policy of conscription of cadaveric organs (Spital & Erin, 2002). This involves removing organs from the recently deceased without first obtaining consent of the donor or his or her family. Proponents of this policy argue that conscription would not only vastly increase the number of available organs, and hence save many lives, but that it is also more efficient and less costly than policies requiring prior consent. Finally, because with a conscription policy all people would share the burden of providing organs after death and all would stand to benefit should the need arise, the policy is fair and just.
    Demonstration of Proficiency
    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    • Competency 1: Articulate ethical issues in health care.
      • Articulate the moral concerns surrounding a policy of organ conscription.
      • Articulate questions about the fairness and justness of organ conscription policy.
      • Explain the relevance and significance of the concept of consent as it pertains to organ donation.
      • Evaluate alternative policies for increasing available donor organs.
    • Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with health care professionals.
      • Exhibit proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills.
    • References
      Munson, R. (2014). Intervention and reflection: Basic issues in bioethics (concise ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
      Spital, A., & Erin, C. (2002). Conscription of cadaveric organs for transplantation: Let’s at least talk about it. American Journal of Kidney Disease, 39(3), 611–615.
      Instructions
      Do you consider the policy of organ conscription to be morally sound?
      Write a paper that answers this question, defending that answer with cogent moral reasoning and supporting your view with ethical theories or moral principles you take to be most relevant to the issue. In addition to reviewing the suggested resources, you are encouraged to locate additional resources in the Capella library, your public library, or authoritative online sites to provide additional support for your viewpoint. Be sure to weave and cite the resources throughout your work.
      In your paper, address the following:
    • On what grounds could one argue that consent is not ethically required for conscription of cadaveric organs? And on what grounds could one argue that consent is required?
    • Is the policy truly just and fair, as supporters claim? Explain.
    • Do you consider one of the alternative policies for increasing available donor organs that Munson discusses to be preferable to conscription? Explain why or why not.
    • Submission Requirements
    • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines.
    • Length: 2–3 typed, double-spaced pages.
    • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
  • SCORING GUIDE
    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

Assessment 5 Instructions: Tonya’s Case: Ethics and Professional Codes

Assessment 5 Instructions: Tonya’s Case: Ethics and Professional Codes

  • Write a 2-3 page paper that examines end-of-life issues in relationship to hospitals, professional ethics, and accrediting bodies.
    How Institutional Conceptual Frameworks Influence Ethical Decision Making
    We wrap things up by exploring institutions and groups designed to help ensure that hospital staff at all levels think and act ethically in caring for patients. Accrediting bodies are oversight agencies charged with performing accreditation of hospitals and helping to establish standards for health care delivery. Their aim is to keep the quality of care as high as possible and to make sure the care is delivered ethically. Ethics committees are groups of individuals within hospitals that meet regularly to advise staff on ethically difficult cases and to promote an ethical institutional culture.
    Demonstration of Proficiency
    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    • Competency 2: Apply sound ethical thinking related to a health care issue.
      • Demonstrate sound ethical thinking in applying ethical principles and moral theories to a specific case.
    • Competency 3: Analyze ethical issues associated with patient care from the perspectives of various health care professionals.
      • Explain professional codes of ethics and apply them in to a specific case.
    • Competency 4: Explain the conceptual framework that health care leaders use to make ethical decisions.
      • Explain organizational documents like mission and value statements and use them to analyze a case study.
      • Explain the role of accrediting bodies and applies this understanding in analyzing a case study.
    • Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with health care professionals.
      • Provides validation and support within written communications by including relevant examples and supporting evidence using APA citations.
      • Produce writing with minimal errors in grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanics.
    • Preparation
      Complete the Case Study: Tonya Archer media activity, which is linked later in this assessment.
      Before you begin creating your submission for this assessment, make sure you have worked through the Tonya Archer case study. This will provide the foundational context for the assessment, for which you will be carrying out independent research by using the Internet to complete the following:
    • Identify the professional code of ethics for your professional specialty or a specialty that you are interested in.
    • With a local hospital in mind (perhaps one you work for), locate the mission, vision, and values statement of that hospital.
    • After you identify the professional ethics code and the hospital mission, vision, and values statements relevant to your work and interests, it may be useful to complete the following:
    • Identify which item in the ethical code you believe is the most important and explain why.
    • Name something in the code you would like to see addressed in more depth. Why?
    • Which item in the code do you think would be the most challenging to follow and why?
    • Does your code make an explicit distinction between what is legal and what is ethical? That is, is the code clear that, while an action may be legal, it may not be ethical?
    • Finally, how well does your professional code of ethics align with the mission and values statement of your hospital? Can you imagine a situation in which following one would make it challenging to follow the other?
    • Instructions
      For this assessment you will apply some concepts we have learned in the course, particularly those relating to the basic principles of health care ethics, professional codes of ethics, and values of health care institutions.
      Write a paper that answers the following questions as it relates to the Tonya Archer Case Study:
    • What are the most relevant end-of-life issues in health care ethics as they relate to this case?
    • What should the hospital do? Should doctors simply keep Tonya on life support, as the parents want? Or, since all medical evidence indicates that Tonya’s brain damage is permanent, should life support be removed?
    • Support your answer with the following considerations in mind:
    • Explain which principles of health care ethics and which moral theory are the best philosophical foundations for your view.
    • Is your view supported by your professional code of ethics? If so, explain how. If not, explain what your code gets wrong about a case like this.
    • Is your view consistent with the mission statement and values of the hospital you identified in your independent research you conducted to prepare to complete this assessment?
    • Would an accrediting body, like the Joint Commission, support your choice? Why or why not?
    • Submission Requirements
      Your paper should meet the following requirements:
    • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines.
    • Length: 2–3 typed, double-spaced pages.
    • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
  • SCORING GUIDE
    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

As a future MSN-prepared nurse

Topic: The Four P’s of Marketing

As a future MSN-prepared nurse, you need to be aware of how to market yourself. Marketing your skill set helps you obtain and retain a position that matches your skillset.

What are the four P’s of marketing and how can they be applied to marketing nursing advanced practice roles? Consider how marketing can promote cost effective care.

According to DuBrin (2015), the following strategies or tactics are identified for enhancing your career: develop career goals,capitalize on your strengths and build your personal brand,be passionate

According to DuBrin (2015), the following strategies or tactics are identified for enhancing your career:

  1. develop career goals,
  2. capitalize on your strengths and build your personal brand,
  3. be passionate about and proud of your work,
  4. develop a code of professional ethics and prosocial motivation,
  5. develop a proactive personality,
  6. keep growing through continuous learning and self-development,
  7. document your accomplishments,
  8. project a professional image, and
  9. perceive yourself as a provider of services. (p. 430)

Identify and explain three career-enhancing techniques or tactics in advancing your career.

Your essay should be at least two pages and should include an introduction, a body of supported material (paragraphs), and a conclusion. Be sure to include two references (on a reference page), and follow all other APA formatting requirements. The reference page does not count toward the total page requirement. Please use the CSU Online Library for providing the supporting sources to complete the paper.

Article Review Diversity Training Locate and review two articles related to diversity training development in organizations

Article Review

Diversity Training

Locate and review two articles related to diversity training development in organizations. Provide a review of these methods used to offer this training as well as which learning style you feel was utilized in each of these training developments (cognitive, behavioral, or a mix of both).

Then, respond to the scenario below.

As a part of your HR team, you need to implement diversity training to your group of 25 employees. Using information from these two articles and the textbook, discuss which training (from the articles) you would select for your diversity training development. Include a discussion of methods and learning styles you feel would best fit your diversity training development of 25 employees and reasons for this selection.

The articles should be at least three pages in length and no more than 3 years old. The CSU Online Library’s databases are good sources for reliable articles. At least one of the two articles must be from the CSU Online Library.

Your review and scenario discussion must be at least two pages in length. The reference and title pages do not count toward meeting the minimum page requirement. Use proper APA formatting for all sources, including articles and the textbook.

Blanchard, P. N., & Thacker, J. W. (2013). Effective training: Systems, strategies, and practices (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.

There are 2 separate questions to answer. 1. A successful manager at one company will be successful at any company. Do you agree or disagree? Why?

There are 2 separate questions to answer.

1. A successful manager at one company will be successful at any company. Do you agree or disagree? Why?Your essay response must be a minimum of 225 words in length.

2. Describe some of the advantages of the 360-DF (360 degree feedback) for managers.Your essay response must be a minimum of 225 words in length

Blanchard, P. N., & Thacker, J. W. (2013). Effective training: Systems, strategies, and practices (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Harvard Business Review case study, create a formal proposal that addresses the following

After having read the “HR as Transformation Partner in Maruti Suzuki Ltd. ” Harvard Business Review case study, create a formal proposal that addresses the following: 1. Identification of the primary business challenges. The focus is on overall business challenges that may or may not include direct HR areas. 2. Proposed Human Resource initiatives to address the challenges identified in #1. The proposal should include resources needed (human capital, financial, etc.) Financial considerations can be an approximation. 3. An evaluation plan that will address the proposed actions identified in #2. Submit the “HR as Transformational Partner in Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.” Case Study in the corresponding link located in the Week 4 Assignment folder by Day 7. *Summation statements and quizzes (if applicable) are due by Day 7 CST. **All resources should be included and cited according to APA format.

Five Questions That Make Strategy Real

  • Read the article titled “Five Questions That Make Strategy Real” located at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/five-questions-make-strategy-real-jack-welch. Read the article titled “Eight Maxims of Strategy”, located here (https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/MGT/599/1178/maxims.pdf.) From the two articles, specify the main differences between strategy and tactics. Provide support for your response.
  • Compare and contrast the main characterization of strategy that both Welch and Sir Liddell-Hart present in their respective articles. Next, from Sir Liddell-Hart’s article, select one of the eight maxims of strategy and provide a real business world example which reflects the maxim you selected. Provide rationale to support your reasoning.