6-1 final project: milestone two

Ace your studies with our custom writing services! We've got your back for top grades and timely submissions, so you can say goodbye to the stress. Trust us to get you there!


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

 Submit Milestone Two, which is the second of two milestones for the final project in this course. For this milestone, you will complete Section III: People, Interests, Options, Criteria (PIOC) Analysis Overview and Section IV: Communication Strategies of the final project.
 

6-1 Final Project: Milestone Two

Submit Milestone Two, which is the second of two milestones for the final project in this course. For this milestone, you will complete Section III: People, Interests, Options, Criteria (PIOC) Analysis Overview and Section IV: Communication Strategies of the final project.

Milestone Two should incorporate your work from:

· Module Four Small Group Discussion: Five Communication Strategy Recommendations

· Module Four Discussion: ZOPA and BATNA for Alice Jones

· Module Five Discussion: Proxemics

· Module Five Assignment: Questions for the Negotiating Session

In your submission, you should recommend options that address both parties’ distributive and integrative interests, using both overt and tacit communication prompts that could be used in the negotiation meeting by Sharon Slade.

Consider blind spots that Sharon Slade may have (but may not be aware of) and that Alice Jones may know. You will want to refer to our readings on the Johari window that address this issue. Be sure to address these potential blind spots when formulating the negotiating positions that you will recommend to Sharon Slade. Doing this will increase the likelihood of reaching an integrative, win-win negotiation outcome.

Before submitting your assignment, be sure to check it against the Milestone Two grading rubric, which is in the Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric document. Refer to this document for more details about this assignment.

6

1 Final Project: Milestone Two

Submit Milestone Two, which is the second of two milestones for the

final project in this course. Fo

r this milestone, you will complete

Section III: People, Interests, Options, Criteria (PIOC) Analysis

Overview and Section IV: Communication Strategies of the final

project.

Milestone Two should incorporate your work from:

·

Module Four Small Group Discussi

on: Five Communication

Strategy Recommendations

·

Module Four Discussion: ZOPA and BATNA for Alice Jones

·

Module Five Discussion: Proxemics

·

Module Five Assignment: Questions for the Negotiating Session

In your submission, you should recommend options that add

ress both

parties’ distributive and integrative interests, using both overt and

tacit communication prompts that could be used in the negotiation

meeting by Sharon Slade.

Consider blind spots that Sharon Slade may have (but may not be

aware of) and that A

lice Jones may know. You will want to refer to our

readings on the Johari window that address this issue. Be sure to

address these potential blind spots when formulating the negotiating

positions that you will recommend to Sharon Slade. Doing this will

inc

rease the likelihood of reaching an integrative, win

win negotiation

outcome.

Before submitting your assignment, be sure to check it against the

Milestone Two grading rubric, which is in the

Milestone

Two

Guidelines

and

Rubric

document. Refer to this document for more

details about this assignment

.

6-1 Final Project: Milestone Two

Submit Milestone Two, which is the second of two milestones for the

final project in this course. For this milestone, you will complete

Section III: People, Interests, Options, Criteria (PIOC) Analysis

Overview and Section IV: Communication Strategies of the final

project.

Milestone Two should incorporate your work from:

 Module Four Small Group Discussion: Five Communication

Strategy Recommendations

 Module Four Discussion: ZOPA and BATNA for Alice Jones

 Module Five Discussion: Proxemics

 Module Five Assignment: Questions for the Negotiating Session

In your submission, you should recommend options that address both

parties’ distributive and integrative interests, using both overt and

tacit communication prompts that could be used in the negotiation

meeting by Sharon Slade.

Consider blind spots that Sharon Slade may have (but may not be

aware of) and that Alice Jones may know. You will want to refer to our

readings on the Johari window that address this issue. Be sure to

address these potential blind spots when formulating the negotiating

positions that you will recommend to Sharon Slade. Doing this will

increase the likelihood of reaching an integrative, win-win negotiation

outcome.

Before submitting your assignment, be sure to check it against the

Milestone Two grading rubric, which is in the Milestone Two

Guidelines and Rubric document. Refer to this document for more

details about this assignment.

WCM 510 Final Project Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric

Prompt: Effective negotiations are designed with four key focus areas in mind: people, interests, options, and criteria (PIOC). Focusing on these four variables
assists in reaching a successful negotiation outcome, a key deliverable for this milestone. Refer to Module One for information regarding PIOC. Discussions on
possible ZOPA and BATNA agreements should also be reviewed in the completion of this milestone.

In addition to submitting a draft of Section III: PIOC Analysis Overview, you will also include Section IV: Communication Strategies of the final project. Section IV
asks you to consider the overt and tacit communication strategies that can be used during the negotiations, as well as their benefits and risks. These two sections
should be revised, based on instructor feedback, and then submitted as part of your analysis and negotiation coaching recommendations for executive leadership
final project, due in Module Ten.

Specifically, your milestone submission must address the following critical elements:

III. PIOC Analysis Overview

A. Formulate appropriate phrasing for the CHRO’s opening remarks that separate the people from the problems. Your phrasing must be based on
principled negotiation practices.

B. Identify case-specific negotiating positions and rephrase them as interests. In other words, Sharon Slade and Alice Jones’ ZOPA and BATNA
positions should be referred to as case-specific negotiating interests. For example, one of Alice Jones’ possible ZOPA positions may be to obtain a
52-week severance package, during which her compensation and benefits continue through the severance period. This can be rephrased as an
interest by adding Alice Jones’ rationale for this position: 52 weeks of severance allows for adequate time to find a comparable position as well
as time for her family to relocate to a new geographic region. You have the option of using a table to illustrate each position and the appropriate
rephrased interest (one row per position-interest).

C. Recommend options that can appropriately address the parties’ integrative interests. You will want to use the open, closed, alternative, and
leading questions developed in the Module Five assignment to craft an integrative bargaining proposal. Feel free to consider potential creative
options that may not be as common.

D. Identify objective criteria that can be used to measure distributive elements of the negotiation. Explain the reasoning for your choices.

IV. Communication Strategies

A. Identify examples of effective overt communication that could be used in this negotiation. Explain the reasoning for your choices. For example,
when hearing a proposal from the executive that would be risky from a human resources perspective, how would you respond? Why?

B. Identify situations where tacit communication is important to this negotiation. Provide examples of how you might use such communication at
upcoming meetings. For example, if you are making an offer to the executive, what non-verbal cues can you provide to let him/her know the
offer is final and you would not be open to negotiating further?

C. Contrast the benefits and risks of using overt and tacit communication methods with respect to this negotiation. For example, might one
particular method be more appropriate than the other? Why?

In your submission, you should recommend options that address both parties’ distributive and integrative interests, using both overt and tacit communication
prompts that could be used in the negotiation meeting by Sharon Slade.

Consider blind spots that Sharon Slade may have (but may not be aware of) and that Alice Jones may know. You will want to refer to our readings on the Johari
window that address this issue. Be sure to address these potential blind spots when formulating the negotiating positions that you will recommend to Sharon
Slade. Doing this will increase the likelihood of reaching an integrative, win-win negotiation outcome.

Rubric

Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a three-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-
inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA 6th edition format. You may also submit the milestone as a five- to six-slide PowerPoint deck, not counting
the title slide or reference slide, with speaker notes provided on each slide. It should be of professional quality and use APA 6th edition format.

Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

PIOC Analysis: CHRO’s
Opening Remarks

Formulates appropriate phrasing,
based on principled negotiation
practices, for the CHRO’s opening
remarks that separates the people
from the problems

Formulates phrasing for the CHRO’s
opening remarks based on
principled negotiation practices, but
phrasing is not appropriate or
logical, or does not separate the
people from the problems

Does not formulate phrasing for the
CHRO’s opening remarks

12

PIOC Analysis: Case-
Specific Negotiating

Identifies appropriate case-specific
negotiating positions and rephrases
them as interests

Identifies negotiating positions and
rephrases them as interests, but
some positions are inappropriate or
are not case-specific

Does not identify negotiating
positions and rephrase them as
interests

12

PIOC Analysis:
Integrative Interests

Recommends options that can
appropriately address the parties’
integrative interests

Recommends options that can
address the parties’ integrative
interests, but some
recommendations are illogical or
inappropriate

Does not recommend options that
can address the parties’ integrative
interests

12

PIOC Analysis:
Objective Criteria

Identifies objective criteria that can
be used to measure distributive
elements of the negotiation,
explaining reasoning for choices

Identifies criteria that can be used
to measure distributive elements of
the negotiation, but not all criteria
are objective, or does not explain
choices

Does not identify criteria that can
be used to measure distributive
elements of the negotiation

12

Communication:
Overt Communication

Identifies examples of effective
overt communication that could be
used in the negotiation, explaining
reasoning

Identifies examples of overt
communication that could be used
in the negotiation, explaining
reasoning, but not all examples are
effective for the given situation, or
reasoning is cursory or illogical

Does not identify examples of overt
communication that could be used
in the negotiation, explaining
reasoning for choices

12

Communication: Tacit
Communication

Identifies situations where tacit
communication is important to the
negotiation and provides examples
of how such communication might
be used in upcoming meetings

Identifies situations where tacit
communication might be used in
the negotiation and provides
examples of how to do so, but not
all situations and examples
identified are important to the
negotiation, involve tacit
communication, or are relevant for
the given situation

Does not identify situations where
tacit communication might be used
and provide examples of how to do
so

12

Communication:
Benefits and Risks

Contrasts the benefits and risks of
using overt and tacit
communication methods with
respect to the negotiation

Contrasts the benefits and risks of
using overt and tacit
communication methods, but
contrast contains inaccuracies, or is
not done with respect to the
negotiation

Does not contrast the benefits and
risks of using overt and tacit
communication methods

12

Secondary Sources Incorporates the concepts and
theory from course material;
integrates at least three secondary
resources throughout the body
paragraphs to support ideas and
claims

Incorporates some concepts and
theory from course material;
integrates some secondary
resources throughout the body
paragraphs to support ideas and
claims but integration is cursory or
secondary resources are
inappropriate

No sources were used to write the
paper and does not incorporate the
concepts and theory from course
material

10

Writing Mechanics Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors related
to citations, grammar, spelling,
syntax, or organization that
negatively impact readability and
articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization that
prevent understanding of ideas

6

Total 100%

Writerbay.net

Looking for top-notch essay writing services? We've got you covered! Connect with our writing experts today. Placing your order is easy, taking less than 5 minutes. Click below to get started.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper