Our papers are 100% unique and written following academic standards and provided requirements. Get perfect grades by consistently using our writing services. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Rely on us and be on schedule! With our help, you'll never have to worry about deadlines again. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Create a 5 pages page paper that discusses the role played by the regulatory ideals in kants mp. The choices which determine their actions should be based on certain maxims which Kant suggested should follow and be should be based on universal laws (Sullivan, 2008, 31). He further points out that the rational agent, however, is granted the choice to exercise his will power even as they live according to these maxims. The role of this ideal, therefore, is to point out the apparent autonomy between morality and the universal laws (Herman, 2007, 46). Agents, therefore, have the freedom of practicing their free will.
Kant further argues that rational agents should never treat their fellow beings as a means to an end but should rather consider actions towards them as an end by itself. This argument is brought about by the aspect of morality that calls for beings to base their actions on reasons (Lake, 2000, 54). Treating other beings as an end in itself requires that the reason behind a certain action is out of moral duty. Moral duty can be explained as doing certain actions because it is the right thing to do. Therefore, treating fellow beings as an end in itself requires that one does certain actions simply because it is what is required of them to do (McCord, 2003, 55).
Rational agents are perceived to be acting as a means to an end when their behavior may be originating from a reason, which does not conform to the aspect of moral duty (Paton, 2007, 56). This is despite the fact that the reasoning behind the action is logical. This, therefore, brings about the issue of looking into the motive of an agent when performing a certain action despite the existence of a logical and well-defined reason. This is important in defining morality. one may be classified as not moral even though they acted out in a rational manner simply because they did so out of ulterior motives.
Kent further argued that an ideally rational agent’s morality is not an issue of .subjectivity. This means that it is reached through reasoning rather than by consideration of the agent’s feelings at the moment of decision making (Kant, 2014, 72). He argued that if morality were subjective, then what is considered moral would greatly vary from one person to another. This is due to the fact that individuals may have different feelings evoked even though they were facing the same circumstances (Philosophy Now Magazine. 2014, 3). Also, an individual may experience different feelings given different times and circumstances that they are being exposed to. .