Discussion and replies

Ace your studies with our custom writing services! We've got your back for top grades and timely submissions, so you can say goodbye to the stress. Trust us to get you there!


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Discussion:

Healthy aging is an important public health issue, both nationally and internationally. The World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes healthy aging as a process whereby all people of all ages are able to live a healthy, safe and socially inclusive lifestyle.  

Discuss how social determinants of health for the older adult are impacted for those living in poverty.  

Instructions: 

Post your discussion to the Moodle Discussion Forum.  Initial post must be made by Day #3.  Word limit 500 words.  Reply to at least two other student posts with a reflection of their response.  Please make sure to provide citations and references (in APA, 7th ed. format) for your work.  

REPLIES

CLASSMATE #1 (200 WORDS AND 3 REFERENCES)

Social cooperation are fundamental for all people as they are social creatures, which is a significant consider maturing. Most friendly communications require supporting, which the old living in neediness can’t bear. Social Determinants of Health (SDH) is characterized as non-clinical viewpoints that effect individuals’ or a populace’s wellbeing’s result. The determinants in these settings incorporate the circumstances, in which the populaces or people are brought into the world in, work, live, and age (Bisht, 2021). They likewise incorporate the more extensive arrangement of frameworks that shape their everyday vocation. The viewpoints inside SDH incorporate financial approaches, normal practices, world of politics, and formative plans. As indicated by WHO, SDH has indispensable effect on the soundness of people and populaces.Food security and sustenance is one more viewpoint that might be related with destitution. Old people that have been affected with destitution are bound to bear the cost of quality food. This puts their wellbeing at gambles in view of poor healthy benefit. As of late, the admittance to nutritious and reasonable nourishment for the older has been testing and this has altogether impacted their sound living since they rely upon modest and unfortunate eating routine for endurance. Destitution is a boundary to medical services and clinical help that the more established grown-ups need to work on their nature of wellbeing and prosperity. Lacking type of revenue forestalls an individual, particularly for this situation the more established grown-ups to look for wellbeing intercessions. It has been laid out that admittance to reasonable medical care is a significant perspective in SDH and inability to get to it will adversely affect the prosperity and soundness of the old person. More seasoned grown-ups have difficulties to deal with their wellbeing and they would much of the time need clinical help and prescriptions to deal with their wellbeing (Beatty and White, 2022). 

Indisputably, neediness is a hindering element influencing the solid maturing of more established grown-ups. Food uncertainty influences their sustenance and wellbeing by restricting the supplements got from the food sources important for a maturing body. Unfortunate lodging prompts different issues, including respiratory sicknesses, diseases from tainting, unfortunate sterilization of conveniences, absence of clean water, detachment, and emotional wellness issues, which influence their wellbeing as they age.

CLASSMATE # 2 (200 WORDS AND 3 REFERENCES)

            Social Determinants of Health (SDH) is defined as non-medical aspects that impact people’s or a population’s health’s outcome. The determinants in these settings include the conditions, in which the populations or individuals are born in, work, live, and age (Bisht, 2021). They also include the wider set of systems that shape their daily livelihood. The aspects within SDH include economic policies, social norms, political environment, and developmental agendas. According to WHO, SDH has vital influence on the health of individuals and populations (Leskošek, 2020). They influence the health equity and inequalities among populations. Poverty significantly influences the SDH of populations, and one of the populations that are greatly affected is the elderly. Elderly health is linked with many problems but one of the things that are highly ignored is how poverty influences their quality of health and wellbeing. Most of the elderly people find themselves in poverty due to high costs of livings and unemployment. 

            The ability to maintain a house would be difficult due to poor economic conditions and their financial obligations on some issues that relate to their health. Most elderly people in the country would find it difficult to hire help to help them with daily chores. Poor financial abilities may drive the elderly patients to lose their homes and others end up being homeless and depend on community shelters (Bisht, 2021). In recent years, the high cost of living and the depreciating economy has been identified as one of the causes of poor health among the elderly. Having the financial abilities to maintain a home has proven to be challenging to the elderly because of lack of employment and other source of income (Leskošek, 2020). Maintain a home entails paying bills such as water bills, gas bills, and electricity bills which are necessity. For instance, in winter, houses need to have electricity to make sure the house is warm and without this, the health of the elderly may be in significant risk.

            Food security and nutrition is another aspect that may be associated with poverty. Elderly individuals that have been impacted with poverty are more likely to afford healthy food. This puts their health at risks because of poor nutritional value (Bisht, 2021). In recent years, the access to nutritious and affordable food for the elderly has been challenging and this has significantly affected their healthy living because they depend on cheap and unhealthy diet for survival. Another worrying trend that is within the poverty and affects the SDH of the elderly is access to healthcare. The need to access affordable and proper healthcare is vital for the elderly. Recent years has proven to be difficult for elderly people to access healthcare due to the complex healthcare system and the high costs that are accompanied by them (Leskošek, 2020). Most of the elderly have been diagnosed with chronic illness and they need constant care but most of the elderly individuals may fail to afford the required care. 

1

MSN5550 Health Promotion: Prevention of Disease

Discussion Board Rubric

Criteria Unsatisfactory-Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary Total

Ideas,
Arguments,
& Analysis

0-30 points 35-39 points 40-44 points 45-50 points /50

Ideas expressed lack an
understanding of the
discussion topic. Comments
are irrelevant, off-topic,
and/or confusing to follow.
Viewpoint, if given, is not
supported with evidence or
examples.

Ideas expressed in discussion
posts show a minimal
understanding of the
discussion topic. Comments are
general in nature and/or
occasionally may not be
relevant. Rehashes or
summarizes ideas with limited
analysis, original thought,
and/or supported viewpoints.

Ideas expressed in discussion
posts are mostly substantive
and relevant to topic; some
original thought. Demonstrates
logical thinking, reasoning,
and/or analysis for most part.
Viewpoint is supported with
evidence and/or examples.

Ideas expressed in discussion
posts include original
thought, substantial depth,
and are relevant to topic.
Viewpoint shows strong
logical thinking, reasoning,
and analysis with evidence
and examples. Construction
of new meaning and insights
are evident.

Connection
to Course
Materials

0-13 points 14-15 points 16-17 points 18-20 points /20

No connections are made to
readings or other course
materials (lectures, media,
resources, etc.), and/or if
made, are not clearly stated
and are largely personal
opinions.

Minimal direct connections are
made to readings and/or other
course materials (lectures,
media, resources, etc.).
Connections are largely
inferred and somewhat unclear
at times.

Some direct connections are
made to readings and/or other
course materials (lectures,
media, resources, etc.) and are
clearly stated for the most
part.

Strong, direct connections
are made to readings and/or
other course materials
(lectures, media, resources,
etc.) and are clearly stated.

Contribution
to Learning
Community

0-13 points 14-15 points 16-17 points 18-20 points /20

Negligible contribution to the
learning community. Rarely
engages with students and
generally ignores others’
posts and/or has a negative
effect through
misrepresenting content in
other posts, inappropriate
comments made, and/or
attempts to dominate the
discussion.

Somewhat contributes to the
learning community but the
focus is generally on own
posts. Occasionally interacts
with others’ postings but little
attempt to involve other
students in the discussion.
Short statements such as “I
agree with…”.

Contributes to the learning
community. Often attempts to
direct group discussion to
present relevant viewpoints
and meaningful reflection by
others. Interacts respectfully
with students.

Effectively contributes to the
learning community.
Frequently initiates dialogue
and motivates group
discussion by providing
feedback to students’
postings, asking follow-up
questions, and through
thoughtful, reflective
comments. Respectfully
encourages a variety of
viewpoints and invites
contributions from others.

2

Discussion Board Rubric (continued)

Criteria Unsatisfactory-Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary Total

Writing
Quality

0-6 points 7 points 8 points 9-10 points /10

Posts show a below
average/poor writing style that
lacks standard English, and/or
is difficult for readers to follow.
Contains frequent errors in
grammar, punctuation, usage,
and spelling.

Posts show an average and/or
casual writing style using
standard English that is
generally clear but contains
some errors in grammar,
punctuation, usage, and
spelling.

Discussion posts show above
average writing style that is
clear using standard English
with minor errors in grammar,
punctuation, usage, and/or
spelling.

Discussion posts are well
written and clearly
articulated using standard
English, characterized by
elements of a strong writing
style with correct grammar,
punctuation, usage, and
spelling.

TOTAL POINTS (sum of 5 Criteria) /100

Source: Rubric by Denise Kreiger, Instructional Design/Technology Services, SC&I, Rutgers, 3/2014

  • Source: Rubric by Denise Kreiger, Instructional Design/Technology Services, SC&I, Rutgers, 3/2014
Writerbay.net

Looking for top-notch essay writing services? We've got you covered! Connect with our writing experts today. Placing your order is easy, taking less than 5 minutes. Click below to get started.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper