Project 1: Stage 3—Interpreting Myth Paper Instructions At this point you will combine the work you have done in Stages 1 and 2 into a complete paper offering an interpretation of the myth you chose.

/in /by

Ace your studies with our custom writing services! We've got your back for top grades and timely submissions, so you can say goodbye to the stress. Trust us to get you there!


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Project 1: Stage 3—Interpreting Myth Paper Instructions

At this point you will combine the work you have done in Stages 1 and 2 into a complete paper offering an interpretation of the myth you chose.

Write a 1000–1250 word essay that includes the following:

  1. A brief summary of the myth
  2. A description of the cultural context of the myth
  3. A description of the archetypes seen in this myth and an explanation of how they can apply to nonmaterial culture (beliefs, values, norms, or customs and traditions, etc.) and gender or societal roles in the myth's culture
  4. An analysis of the meaning of the myth in that culture that uses a theoretical approach to shows how the myth relates to specific element(s) of nonmaterial culture in terms of the moral, political, social, economic, scientific, or proto-scientific message it contains
  5. A conclusion
  6. A reference list in MLA format

Submit this as a Word document. The text of the essay should be typed, double-spaced, and use a common 12-pt. font like Times New Roman or Calibri.

” inline=”” style=”display: inline; overflow-wrap: break-word; overflow: auto hidden; text-align: start;”>Project 1: Stage 3—Interpreting Myth PaperInstructions

At this point you will combine the work you have done in Stages 1 and 2 into a complete paper offering an interpretation of the myth you chose.

Write a 1000–1250 word essay that includes the following:

  1. A brief summary of the myth
  2. A description of the cultural context of the myth
  3. A description of the archetypes seen in this myth and an explanation of how they can apply to nonmaterial culture (beliefs, values, norms, or customs and traditions, etc.) and gender or societal roles in the myth’s culture
  4. An analysis of the meaning of the myth in that culture that uses a theoretical approach to shows how the myth relates to specific element(s) of nonmaterial culture in terms of the moral, political, social, economic, scientific, or proto-scientific message it contains
  5. A conclusion
  6. A reference list in MLA format

Submit this as a Word document. The text of the essay should be typed, double-spaced, and use a common 12-pt. font like Times New Roman or Calibri.

Due DateJun 20, 2023 11:59 PM

Project 1: Stage 3—Interpreting Myth Paper Instructions At this point you will combine the work you have done in Stages 1 and 2 into a complete paper offering an interpretation of the myth you chose.
Pro je ct 1 : S ta g e 3 – I n te rp re tin g M yth P ap er R ub ric C ours e : H UM N 3 51 6 380 M yth in t h e W orld ( 2 235) C rit e ria O uts ta n d in g Su p erio r G ood/N eed s Im pro ve m en t C rit e rio n S co re M yth S u m mary 1 5% / 2 2 A rc h ety p al R ole s 2 0% / 3 0 2 2 p o in ts B rie fly a n d acc u ra te ly s u m m ariz e s k e y p o in ts in t h e m yth b ein g e xam in ed w hic h le n d th em se lv e s t o t h e p o in ts b ein g m ad e in t h e e ssa y. 2 0-2 2 p o in ts 1 9 p o in ts S u m m ariz e s t h e m yth u n d er exam in atio n. T his s u m m ary m ay b e to o b rie f o r t o o le n gth y. 1 6-1 9 p o in ts 1 5 p o in ts M yth b ein g u se d is n o t su m m ariz e d , o r sig n if ic a n t d eta ils f ro m t h e s u m mary a re m is sin g. 0 -1 5 p o in ts 3 0 p o in ts T he s u b m is sio n id en tif ie s m ajo r ch ara cte rs a n d m atc h es e ach t o a p pro pria te a rc h ety p es. T he exp la n atio n f o r each p air in g co nta in s b eli e vab le a n d w ell- th o ugh t o ut ra tio nale . 2 7-3 0 p o in ts 2 6 p o in ts T he s u b m is sio n id en tif ie s m ajo r ch ara cte rs a n d m atc h es e ach t o a n a rc h ety p e. T he exp la n atio n f o r each p air in g co nta in s g e n era l ra tio nale . 2 1-2 6 p o in ts 2 0 p o in ts T he s u b m is sio n m ig h t n ot id en tif y m ajo r c h ara cte rs a n d /o r m atc h e ach t o a n ap pro pria te a rc h ety p e. T he exp la n atio n f o r o ne o r m ore p air in g c o nta in s in co rre ct o r in su ffic ie n t ra tio nale . 0 -2 0 p ts . Crit e ria O uts ta n d in g Su p erio r G ood/N eed s Im pro ve m en t C rit e rio n S co re C ult u ra l C onte xt 2 0% / 3 0 A naly sis 2 0% / 3 0 3 0 p o in ts 0 – 1 p o in ts D esc rib es th e c u lt u ra l co nte xt o f t h e m yth u sin g sp ecif ic , r e le van t, a n d a cc u ra te d eta ils . 2 7-3 0 p o in ts 2 6 p o in ts D esc rib es t h e cu lt u ra l c o nte xt o f th e m yth in s o m e deta ils , b ut n eed s m ore s p ecif ic it y , re le van cy , o r acc u ra cy . 2 1-2 6 p o in ts 2 0 p o in ts D oes n ot d esc rib e th e c u lt u ra l co nte xt o r a sse rts e it h er t a n ge n tia l o r o ve rly g e n era l co m m en ts w hic h d o n ot e ffe ctiv e ly c h ara cte riz e t h e re le van t c u lt u ra l co nte xt. 0 -2 0 p o in ts 3 0 p o in ts E ffe ctiv e ly d is c u sse s t h e r o le o f t h e m yth in it s c u lt u ra l c o nte xt. U se s a n d e xp la in s at le ast o ne th eo ry t o d is c u ss n o nm ate ria l cu lt u re . S u p po rts p o in ts w it h re le van t a n d te lli n g e xam ple s. 2 7-3 0 p o in ts 2 6 p o in ts D is c u sse s t h e r o le o f t h e m yth in it s c u lt u ra l c o nte xt. U se s a n d /o r exp la in s a t le ast o ne o f m ate ria l a n d n o nm ate ria l th eo ry t o a d dre ss n o nm ate ria l cu lt u re , b ut c o uld e xp la in t h eo ry a n d it s a p pli c a tio n fu rth er. S u p po rts a t le ast o ne p o in t w it h a r e le van t exam ple . 2 7-3 0 p o in ts 2 0 p o in ts D oes n ot r e la te t h e m yth t o it s c u lt u ra l c o nte xt e ffe ctiv e ly . D oes n ot s u ffic ie n tly e xp la in a t h eo ry a n d /o r a d dre ss n o n-m ate ria l cu lt u re o r m is in te rp re ts k e y p o in ts o f t h e th eo ry . 0 -2 0 p o in ts Crit e ria O uts ta n d in g Su p erio r G ood/N eed s Im pro ve m en t C rit e rio n S co re C onclu sio n 5 % / 8 W rit in g 1 0% / 1 5 8 p o in ts C onclu sio n su cc in ctly a n d effe ctiv e ly w ra p s up p ap er. 7 -8 p o in ts 6 p o in ts C onclu sio n w ra p s up p ap er. 5 -6 p o in ts 5 p o in ts N o c o nclu sio n in clu d ed . 0 -5 p o in ts 1 5 p o in ts G ra m matic a l a n d str u ctu ra l is su es d o n ot im ped e stu d en t’s i n te n d ed m ean in g. 1 4-1 5 p o in ts 1 3 p o in ts G ra m matic a l a n d str u ctu ra l is su es im ped e s tu d en t’s i n te n d ed m ean in g. 1 1-1 3 p o in ts 1 0 p o in ts G ra m matic a l a n d str u ctu ra l is su es sy ste m ic a lly i m ped e s tu d en t’s i n te n d ed m ean in g th ro ugh o ut t h e w ork . 0 -1 0 p o in ts To ta l / 1 5 0 O ve ra ll S co re C rit e ria O uts ta n d in g Su p erio r G ood/N eed s Im pro ve m en t C rit e rio n S co re U se o f s o urc e s 1 0% / 1 5 1 5 p o in ts S o urc e s u se d a re a ll r e li a b le a n d cre d ib le . A t le ast th re e d if fe re n t so urc e s a re u se d effe ctiv e ly . S o urc e s a re p ro perly a ttr ib ute d a n d cit e d c o rre ctly a cco rd in g t o M LA sty le . 1 4-1 5 p o in ts 1 3 p o in ts M ost s o urc e s u se d a re r e li a b le a n d c re d ib le . A t le ast t h re e so urc e s a re m en tio ned b ut n ot a ll u se d effe ctiv e ly . S o urc e s a re a ttr ib ute d a n d cit e d m ostly c o rre ctly a cco rd in g t o M LA sty le . T here m ay b e o ne o r t w o m in o r e rro rs in t h e c it a tio n. 1 1-1 3 p o in ts 1 0 p o in ts F e w er t h an t h re e so urc e s a re u se d . So urc e s a re n ot re li a b le o r cre d ib le . S o urc e s are n ot a ttr ib ute d o r c it e d o r n o atte m pt a t a f u ll c it a tio n is m ad e (i.e . c it a tio n m ay ju st b e a t it le o r a li n k). 0 -1 0 p o in ts O uts ta n d in g 111 p o in ts m in im um S u p erio r 106 p o in ts m in im um G ood/N eed s I m pro ve m en t 0 p o in ts m in im um
Project 1: Stage 3—Interpreting Myth Paper Instructions At this point you will combine the work you have done in Stages 1 and 2 into a complete paper offering an interpretation of the myth you chose.
surname3 Name Professor Course Number: HUMN 351 Date The Myth of Quetzalcoatl and Tezcatlipoca Summary of Myth The Myth of Quetzalcoatl and Tezcatlipoca is a creation myth. It is from ancient Mesoamerican culture. It has two major characters: Quetzalcoatl and Tezcatlipoca. Quetzalcoatl gets matched with the archetypal role of the hero. He is a noble and virtuous god. He is associated with creation and knowledge (Carrasco, 1992). Tezcatlipoca gets matched with the archetypal role of the trickster. He is a god of chaos and disorder. He is associated with sorcery and deceit. Culture The archetypes present in this myth represent the nonmaterial culture of ancient Mesoamerican society. It is particularly true in their beliefs about the relationship between humans and gods. It includes the importance of knowledge and wisdom. The hero archetype represented by Quetzalcoatl is vital (Carrasco, 1992). Noble and virtuous behavior is praised. On the other hand, the duality of human nature is seen through Tezcatlipoca. It shows the need to balance order and chaos. The Category(s) of Creation Myth The Myth of Quetzalcoatl and Tezcatlipoca belongs to the category of creation myths. They are stories that explain the origins of the universe and human beings. It reflects the complex beliefs and values of Mesoamerican culture. It pinpoints the importance of balance between order and chaos. The role of sacrifice in creation and the significance of knowledge get explained and discussed. One theorist’s approach is not related to the archetypes but could get used to discuss the relationship between the myth and the nonmaterial culture is Victor Turner’s cultural performance theory. Turner believed that myths and rituals were forms of cultural performance. They allowed individuals to express and negotiate their social identities and relationships. In the case of Quetzalcoatl and Tezcatlipoca, the myth serves as a cultural performance. It expresses Mesoamerican beliefs. It focuses on the relationships between humans and gods. Wisdom and knowledge are vital parameters. Interest in the Myth One reason why this myth interests me is because it represents a unique perspective on creation. In Mesoamerican culture, the gods were not distant and impersonal figures. They were active participants in the lives of humans. It means they had intimate relationships. This myth reflects the duality of human nature and the importance of balance between opposing forces. The two main characters are complementary and interconnected. It reflects the Mesoamerican belief that the world gets made up of opposing forces. They are necessary for the world to function properly. Works Cited Carrasco, Davíd. “Quetzalcoatl and the Irony of Empire: Myths and Prophecies in the Aztec Tradition.” University of Chicago Press, 1992. Holley-Kline, S. (2022). From Mesoamerican History to the History of Mexican Archaeology. Latin American Research Review, 1-10. Nicholson, H.B. “Tezcatlipoca: Trickster and Supreme Deity.” University of Texas Press, 2001. Spence, Lewis. “The Myths of Mexico and Peru.” Dover Publications, 1990.

Writerbay.net

Looking for top-notch essay writing services? We've got you covered! Connect with our writing experts today. Placing your order is easy, taking less than 5 minutes. Click below to get started.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper