Research Assignment: IRB Proposal This is connected to previous assignments. This wil connect to my final proposal. Use your research to complete the IRB Proposal. Please complete and upload your inf

Research Assignment: IRB Proposal This is connected to previous assignments. This wil connect to my final proposal. Use your research to complete the IRB Proposal. Please complete and upload your inf
MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review APPLICATION FORM – INITIAL REVIEW INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD Room 117 Main Building 555 Broadway Dobbs Ferry NY 10522 [email protected] MC IRB Protocol No.: Date of IRB Review: For office use only PROJECT TITLE       PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Degree(s) Campus Phone Number                   Department Campus Mailing Address Connect/Mercy E-mail Address                   FACULTY SPONSOR Name (Last, First) Degree(s) Campus Phone Number                   Department Campus Mailing Address Mercy E-mail Address                   List all co-investigators below, including those from other institutions STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phone # Connect E-mail Address                   Mailing Address       STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phone # Connect E-mail Address                   Mailing Address       STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phone # Connect E-mail Address                   Mailing Address       STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phone # Connect E-mail Address                   Mailing Address       Check the proposed research category: Category I (Administrative Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] Category II (Expedited Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] Category III (Full Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] FUNDING SOURCES Check all of the appropriate boxes for funding sources for this research. Include pending funding source(s). Federal Grant Faculty Development Grant Personal Funds Department Gift Commercial – company name:       Other:       If federally funded, provide name and address of individual to whom certification of IRB approval should be sent:       Name       Address line 1       Address line 2       City, State, Zip Attach the research proposal/protocol that was sent to the agency, committee, or sponsor for peer-review of scientific merit if applicable. DATA COLLECTION OR COLLABORATING SITES If the participants are to be recruited from an institution or organization (e.g., hospital, social service agency, prison, school, etc.) or from a privately owned business (private practice, local sports gym, etc.), documentation of permission from the institution must be submitted to the committee before final approval can be given. Letters of permission (on organization’s letterhead) from a senior office of the institution, organization, or business should authorize the investigator(s) to contact potential participants, to use the facilities, or access the records of that entity. If this project is being reviewed by any other human participants research review group (e.g., hospital institutional review board), a copy of the approval of that institutional must be attached or a statement of the status of the review must be noted. List all collaborating and data collection sites Provide certification or letter of IRB approval Provide letters of cooperation or support (as appropriate)       Attached Will follow N/A Attached Will follow N/A       Attached Will follow N/A Attached Will follow N/A Briefly state the problem, the present knowledge relevant to it, and the aims and significance of the proposed research. Cite appropriate literature.       Describe the tasks/tests or procedures participants will be asked to complete. (Suggestions: explain step by step what the participants will be asked to do and distinguish those which are experimental from those which comprise routine clinical care/services.) Attach copies of all questionnaires, testing instruments or interview protocols; include any cover letters or instructions to participants. Provide references on reliability and validity of published tools and written permission to use copyrighted tests if you have not purchased the test.       If participants will come in contact with any mechanical, electrical or other equipment, the form entitled Utilizing Research Equipment with Human Participants must be completed by the investigator and a verified safety check. Description of the Human Participants and the Recruitment Procedures Participant Population Anticipated number: Male       Female       Total       (This number should be the number of participants you will enroll in order to get the adequate data sets you will need. If multiple sites are to be used, provide an estimate of the number in each category to be recruited from each site. In addition, if you plan to study only one sex, provide scientific rationale in the inclusion/exclusion section of the application.) Age Range (check all that apply): 0 – 7 yrs. (submit parental permission form) 8 – 17 yrs. (submit child’s assent form, parental permission form) 18 – 64 yrs. (submit consent form) 65+ yrs. (submit consent form) Source/type of participants: (check all that apply) Mercy College employees Mercy College students inpatients or outpatients Community volunteers other: specify       State any relationship (past or present) the researcher may have with the potential participants:       Location of participants during research data collection (check all that apply): Participant’s home Mercy College locations: specify       Local hospitals: specify       community settings: specify       other institutions: specify       elementary schools: specify       secondary schools: specify       other: specify       Describe populations to be excluded from the research. Please describe procedures to assure equitable selection of participants. Researchers should not select participants on the basis of discriminatory criteria. Selection criteria that exclude one sex, racial, or ethnic group require a clear scientific rationale for the exclusion.       Special populations to be included in the research (check all that apply): minors under age 18 pregnant women fetus/fetal tissue prisoners economically disadvantaged other: specify       Provide rationale for using special populations. The groups listed in (f) above are considered “vulnerable” or require special consideration by the federal regulatory agencies and by the IRB.       Recruitment Procedures Describe how participants will be identified and recruited. Attach all recruitment information, e.g., advertisements, bulletin board notices, and recruitment letters for all types of media (printed, radio, email, electronic, TV, or Internet).       Initial Contact. Describe who will make initial contact. How? If participants are chosen from records, indicate who gave approval for the use of the records. If records are “private” medical or student records, provide the protocol, consent forms, letters, etc., for securing consent of the participants for the records. Written documentation for cooperation/permission from the holder or custodian of the records should be attached. (Initial contact of participants identified through a records search must be made by the official holder of the record, i.e. primary physician, therapist, public school official.)       List criteria for inclusion and exclusion of participants in this study. Inclusion:       Exclusion:       How will the inclusion/exclusion criteria be assessed and by whom?       Will participants receive incentives before or rewards after the study (e.g., academic credit, money)? If yes, explain. (Note: this information must be outlined in the consent document.) Yes No       Will the participants be charged for research-related procedures? For example, will participants be charged for extra tests/services related to the research? If yes, explain charges, including estimated amounts. Will there be financial coverage for the extra costs? If yes, explain. (Note: this information must be included in the consent document.) Yes No       Risks and Benefits of the Research Identify the risks (current and potential) and describe the expected frequency, degree of severity, and potential reversibility. Include any potential late effects. (Note: risks can be psychological, physical, social, economic, or legal.)       Does the research involve (check all that apply): administration of drugs, and chemical or biological agents administration of physical stimuli changes in diet or exercise use of private records (medical or educational records) possible invasion of privacy of participant or family deprivation of physiological requirements such as nutrition or sleep manipulation of psychological or social variables such as sensory deprivation, social isolation, psychological stresses the collection of personal or sensitive information in surveys or interviews use of a deceptive technique (If use of deception is part of the experimental protocol, the protocol must include a “debriefing procedure” [provide this procedure for IRB review] which will be followed upon completion of the study, or withdrawal of the participants.) presentation of materials that participants might consider offensive, threatening, or degrading other risks: specify       Describe the precautions taken to minimize risk:       Care of participants in case of an accident: Describe the provisions that have been made for the care of the participant in the event of an accident or complication related to the research procedures. (Note: This section may not apply to Category I or II research. Also, unless specific sponsored contracts exist to cover research-related injuries, the standard treatment compensation language must be included in the consent form [see sample].)       Why are the risks and inconveniences mentioned above reasonable? What is the expected scientific yield from the project? Please justify the risks in relation to the anticipated benefits to the participants and in relation to the importance of the knowledge that may reasonably be expected to result from the research.       Benefits of participation: List any anticipated direct benefits of participation in this research project. If none, state that fact here and in the consent form. The knowledge gained from the study could produce a benefit to society. Payment is not considered to be a benefit of participation. Any benefits of treatment should be listed as potential benefits.       Confidentiality of Data Describe provisions made to maintain confidentiality of data. How will the data be coded? Who will have access to raw data? Will raw data be made available to anyone other than the Principal Investigator and immediate study personnel (e.g., school officials, medical personnel)? If yes, who, how, and why? Describe the procedure for sharing data. Describe how the participant will be informed that the data may be shared.       Where will the data be kept and for how long? How will audio and video tapes be disposed of? (Disposition of audio and video tapes should be included in consent form.)       Will the research data and information be part of the medical chart, academic record, or other permanent record? (Explain here and in the consent form.) Yes No       Informed Consent Process Simply giving a consent form to a participant does not constitute informed consent. The following questions pertain to the process. Researchers are cautioned that consent forms should be written in simple declarative sentences. The forms should be jargon-free. Foreign language versions should be prepared for any applicable research. Capacity to consent. Will all adult participants have the capacity to give informed consent? Yes No If not, describe the likely range of impairment and explain how, and by whom, their capacity to consent will be determined. Note: In research involving more than minimal risk, capacity to consent should be determined by a psychiatrist, clinical psychologist, or other qualified professional not otherwise involved in the research. Individuals who lack the capacity to consent may participate in research only if a legally authorized representative gives consent on their behalf.       Is the informed consent document attached? Yes No See MC IRB website for informed consent information: http://www.mercy.edu/stafffaculty/irb/sampleconsent.htm If you are using telephone surveys, telephone scripts are required.       How will participants’ understanding be assessed? What questions will be asked to assess the participants’ understanding; will there be written responses; will understanding be assessed at other points in time? (Note: the purpose of this question is to ask you to describe how you will assess participants’ understanding of the consent process. Questions requiring “yes/no” answers do not do that very well. Please ask participants to explain the purpose of the study to you along with the risks and benefits to themselves as participants. Their answers to these questions should allow you to determine if they understand the study and their part in it. If they do not understand, informed consent has not been achieved even if the participant signed the consent document.)       In relation to the actual data gathering, when and where will consent be discussed and documentation obtained, for example, immediately prior to the data collection or several days before? Be specific.       Will the investigator(s) be securing all of the informed consents? Yes No If no, name the specific individuals who will obtain informed consent and include their job title and a brief description of your plans to train these individuals to obtain consent and answer participants’ questions.       Are you requesting Waiver or Alteration of Informed Consent? Yes No An IRB may approve a consent which does not include, or alters, some or all of the elements of informed consent (e.g., oral consent). Provide justifications for the following questions for requesting a waiver of written informed consent. Why does the proposed research present no more than minimal risk to the participants?       Why will a waiver of informed consent not adversely affect the rights and welfare of participants?       Why is it impracticable to carry out the research without a waiver or alteration of informed consent?       How will pertinent information be provided to the participants, if appropriate, at a later date?       Even if waiver of written informed consent is granted, you may be required to obtain verbal permission which reflects elements of the written consent (if appropriate). Please specify below the information to be read/given to the research participants.       Investigator Training 1. Describe the investigator(s) training and experience to conduct the research (e.g., training and experience). Include a copy of certificate demonstrating completion of the NIH Computer Based Training Program (required for all key personnel in the research project).       INVESTIGATOR’S ASSURANCE I certify that the information provided in this application is complete and correct. I understand that as Principal Investigator, I have ultimate responsibility for the protection of the rights and welfare of human participants, conduct of the study and the ethical performance of the project. I agree to comply with all Mercy College policies and procedures, as well as with all applicable federal, state and local laws regarding the protection of human participants in research, including, but not limited to, the following: The project will be performed by qualified personnel according to the MC IRB certified protocol, No changes will be made in the protocol or consent form until approved by the MC IRB, Legally effective informed consent will be obtained from human participants if applicable, and Adverse events will be reported to the MC IRB in a timely manner. I have completed the required educational program on ethical principles and regulatory requirements. I further certify that the proposed research is not currently underway and will not begin until approval has been obtained. ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________ Principal Investigator Date FACULTY SPONSOR’S ASSURANCE By my signature as sponsor on this research application, I certify that the student or guest investigator is knowledgeable about the regulations and policies governing research with human participants and has sufficient training and experience to conduct this particular study in accord with the approved protocol. In addition, I agree to meet with the investigator on a regular basis to monitor study progress, Should problems arise during the course of the study, I agree to be available, personally, to supervise the investigator in solving them, I insure that the investigator will promptly report significant or untoward adverse effects to the MC IRB in a timely manner, If I will be unavailable, as when on sabbatical leave or vacation, I will arrange for an alternate faculty sponsor to assume responsibility during my absence and I will advise the MC IRB by letter of such arrangements, and I have insured that the investigator completed the required educational program on ethical principles and regulatory requirements. I further certify that the proposed research is not currently underway and will not begin until approval has been obtained. ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________ Faculty Sponsor* (if PI is a student or a fellow) Date *The faculty sponsor must be a member of the MC faculty. The faculty member is considered the responsible party for legal and ethical performance of the project. Page 19 of 12
Research Assignment: IRB Proposal This is connected to previous assignments. This wil connect to my final proposal. Use your research to complete the IRB Proposal. Please complete and upload your inf
Page 1 of 12 APPLICATION FORM – INITIAL REVIEW INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD Room 117 Main Building 555 Broadway Dobbs Ferry NY 10522 [email protected] MC IRB Protocol No.: Date of IRB Review: For office use only PROJECT TITLE Good Gig Jobs or Bad Gig Jobs? The Impact of Sharing Economy W ork on Career Trajectory PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Degree(s) Campus Phone Number Ravenelle, Alexandrea Ph.D. 914-674-7341 Department Campus Mailing Address Connec t/Mercy E-mail Address Social and Behavioral Science 555 Broadway, Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 [email protected] FACULTY SPONSOR Name (Last, First) Degree(s) Campus Phone Number Ravenelle, Alexandrea Ph.D. 914-674-7341 Department Campus Mailing Address Mercy E-mail Address Social and Behavioral Science 555 Broadway, Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 [email protected] List all co-investigators below, including those from other insti tutions STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phone # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phon e # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phon e # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phon e # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address Page 1 of 12 APPLICATION FORM – INITIAL REVIEW INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD Room 117 Main Building 555 Broadway Dobbs Ferry NY 10522 [email protected] MC IRB Protocol No.: Date of IRB Review: For office use only PROJECT TITLE Good Gig Jobs or Bad Gig Jobs? The Impact of Sharing Economy W ork on Career Trajectory PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Degree(s) Campus Phone Number Ravenelle, Alexandrea Ph.D. 914-674-7341 Department Campus Mailing Address Connec t/Mercy E-mail Address Social and Behavioral Science 555 Broadway, Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 [email protected] FACULTY SPONSOR Name (Last, First) Degree(s) Campus Phone Number Ravenelle, Alexandrea Ph.D. 914-674-7341 Department Campus Mailing Address Mercy E-mail Address Social and Behavioral Science 555 Broadway, Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 [email protected] List all co-investigators below, including those from other insti tutions STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phone # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phon e # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phon e # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phon e # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address Page 1 of 12 APPLICATION FORM – INITIAL REVIEW INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD Room 117 Main Building 555 Broadway Dobbs Ferry NY 10522 [email protected] MC IRB Protocol No.: Date of IRB Review: For office use only PROJECT TITLE Good Gig Jobs or Bad Gig Jobs? The Impact of Sharing Economy W ork on Career Trajectory PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Degree(s) Campus Phone Number Ravenelle, Alexandrea Ph.D. 914-674-7341 Department Campus Mailing Address Connec t/Mercy E-mail Address Social and Behavioral Science 555 Broadway, Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 [email protected] FACULTY SPONSOR Name (Last, First) Degree(s) Campus Phone Number Ravenelle, Alexandrea Ph.D. 914-674-7341 Department Campus Mailing Address Mercy E-mail Address Social and Behavioral Science 555 Broadway, Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 [email protected] List all co-investigators below, including those from other insti tutions STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phone # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phon e # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phon e # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phon e # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address Page 1 of 12 APPLICATION FORM – INITIAL REVIEW INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD Room 117 Main Building 555 Broadway Dobbs Ferry NY 10522 [email protected] MC IRB Protocol No.: Date of IRB Review: For office use only PROJECT TITLE Good Gig Jobs or Bad Gig Jobs? The Impact of Sharing Economy W ork on Career Trajectory PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Degree(s) Campus Phone Number Ravenelle, Alexandrea Ph.D. 914-674-7341 Department Campus Mailing Address Connec t/Mercy E-mail Address Social and Behavioral Science 555 Broadway, Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 [email protected] FACULTY SPONSOR Name (Last, First) Degree(s) Campus Phone Number Ravenelle, Alexandrea Ph.D. 914-674-7341 Department Campus Mailing Address Mercy E-mail Address Social and Behavioral Science 555 Broadway, Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 [email protected] List all co-investigators below, including those from other insti tutions STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phone # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phon e # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phon e # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phon e # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address Page 1 of 12 APPLICATION FORM – INITIAL REVIEW INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD Room 117 Main Building 555 Broadway Dobbs Ferry NY 10522 [email protected] MC IRB Protocol No.: Date of IRB Review: For office use only PROJECT TITLE Good Gig Jobs or Bad Gig Jobs? The Impact of Sharing Economy W ork on Career Trajectory PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Degree(s) Campus Phone Number Ravenelle, Alexandrea Ph.D. 914-674-7341 Department Campus Mailing Address Connec t/Mercy E-mail Address Social and Behavioral Science 555 Broadway, Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 [email protected] FACULTY SPONSOR Name (Last, First) Degree(s) Campus Phone Number Ravenelle, Alexandrea Ph.D. 914-674-7341 Department Campus Mailing Address Mercy E-mail Address Social and Behavioral Science 555 Broadway, Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 [email protected] List all co-investigators below, including those from other insti tutions STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phone # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phon e # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phon e # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phon e # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 2 of 12 Check the proposed research category: Category I (Administrative Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] Category II (Expedited Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] Category III (Full Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] FUNDING SOURCES Check all of the appropriate boxes for funding sources for t his research. Include pending funding source(s). Federal Grant Faculty Development Grant Personal Funds Department Gift Commercial – company name : X Other : Labor Research Action Network (LRAN) Grant, (received) If federally funded, provide name and address of individual to whom certification of IRB approval should be sent: Name Address line 1 Address line 2 City, State, Zip Attach the research proposal/protocol that was sent to the agency , committee, or sponsor for peer-review of scientific merit if applicable. DATA COLLECTION OR COLLABORATING SITES If the participants are to be recruited from an instituti on or organization (e.g., hospital, social service agency, prison, school, etc.) or from a privately owned business (p rivate practice, local sports gym, etc.), documentation of permission from the institution must be submitted to the committee before final approval can be given. Letters of permission (on organizatio n’s letterhead) from a senior office of the institution, organization, or business should authorize t he investigator(s) to contact potential participants, to use the facilities, or access the records of th at entity. If this project is being reviewed by any other human partici pants research review group (e.g., hospital institutional review board), a copy of the approval of that institutional must be attached or a statement of the status of the review must be noted. List all collaborating and data collection sites Provide certification or letter of IRB approval Provide letters of cooperation or support (as appropriate) 1. NA Attached Will follow N/A Attached Will follow N/A 2. Attached Will follow N/A Attached Will follow N/A MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 2 of 12 Check the proposed research category: Category I (Administrative Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] Category II (Expedited Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] Category III (Full Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] FUNDING SOURCES Check all of the appropriate boxes for funding sources for t his research. Include pending funding source(s). Federal Grant Faculty Development Grant Personal Funds Department Gift Commercial – company name : X Other : Labor Research Action Network (LRAN) Grant, (received) If federally funded, provide name and address of individual to whom certification of IRB approval should be sent: Name Address line 1 Address line 2 City, State, Zip Attach the research proposal/protocol that was sent to the agency , committee, or sponsor for peer-review of scientific merit if applicable. DATA COLLECTION OR COLLABORATING SITES If the participants are to be recruited from an instituti on or organization (e.g., hospital, social service agency, prison, school, etc.) or from a privately owned business (p rivate practice, local sports gym, etc.), documentation of permission from the institution must be submitted to the committee before final approval can be given. Letters of permission (on organizatio n’s letterhead) from a senior office of the institution, organization, or business should authorize t he investigator(s) to contact potential participants, to use the facilities, or access the records of th at entity. If this project is being reviewed by any other human partici pants research review group (e.g., hospital institutional review board), a copy of the approval of that institutional must be attached or a statement of the status of the review must be noted. List all collaborating and data collection sites Provide certification or letter of IRB approval Provide letters of cooperation or support (as appropriate) 1. NA Attached Will follow N/A Attached Will follow N/A 2. Attached Will follow N/A Attached Will follow N/A MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 2 of 12 Check the proposed research category: Category I (Administrative Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] Category II (Expedited Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] Category III (Full Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] FUNDING SOURCES Check all of the appropriate boxes for funding sources for t his research. Include pending funding source(s). Federal Grant Faculty Development Grant Personal Funds Department Gift Commercial – company name : X Other : Labor Research Action Network (LRAN) Grant, (received) If federally funded, provide name and address of individual to whom certification of IRB approval should be sent: Name Address line 1 Address line 2 City, State, Zip Attach the research proposal/protocol that was sent to the agency , committee, or sponsor for peer-review of scientific merit if applicable. DATA COLLECTION OR COLLABORATING SITES If the participants are to be recruited from an instituti on or organization (e.g., hospital, social service agency, prison, school, etc.) or from a privately owned business (p rivate practice, local sports gym, etc.), documentation of permission from the institution must be submitted to the committee before final approval can be given. Letters of permission (on organizatio n’s letterhead) from a senior office of the institution, organization, or business should authorize t he investigator(s) to contact potential participants, to use the facilities, or access the records of th at entity. If this project is being reviewed by any other human partici pants research review group (e.g., hospital institutional review board), a copy of the approval of that institutional must be attached or a statement of the status of the review must be noted. List all collaborating and data collection sites Provide certification or letter of IRB approval Provide letters of cooperation or support (as appropriate) 1. NA Attached Will follow N/A Attached Will follow N/A 2. Attached Will follow N/A Attached Will follow N/A MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 2 of 12 Check the proposed research category: Category I (Administrative Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] Category II (Expedited Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] Category III (Full Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] FUNDING SOURCES Check all of the appropriate boxes for funding sources for t his research. Include pending funding source(s). Federal Grant Faculty Development Grant Personal Funds Department Gift Commercial – company name : X Other : Labor Research Action Network (LRAN) Grant, (received) If federally funded, provide name and address of individual to whom certification of IRB approval should be sent: Name Address line 1 Address line 2 City, State, Zip Attach the research proposal/protocol that was sent to the agency , committee, or sponsor for peer-review of scientific merit if applicable. DATA COLLECTION OR COLLABORATING SITES If the participants are to be recruited from an instituti on or organization (e.g., hospital, social service agency, prison, school, etc.) or from a privately owned business (p rivate practice, local sports gym, etc.), documentation of permission from the institution must be submitted to the committee before final approval can be given. Letters of permission (on organizatio n’s letterhead) from a senior office of the institution, organization, or business should authorize t he investigator(s) to contact potential participants, to use the facilities, or access the records of th at entity. If this project is being reviewed by any other human partici pants research review group (e.g., hospital institutional review board), a copy of the approval of that institutional must be attached or a statement of the status of the review must be noted. List all collaborating and data collection sites Provide certification or letter of IRB approval Provide letters of cooperation or support (as appropriate) 1. NA Attached Will follow N/A Attached Will follow N/A 2. Attached Will follow N/A Attached Will follow N/A MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 2 of 12 Check the proposed research category: Category I (Administrative Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] Category II (Expedited Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] Category III (Full Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] FUNDING SOURCES Check all of the appropriate boxes for funding sources for t his research. Include pending funding source(s). Federal Grant Faculty Development Grant Personal Funds Department Gift Commercial – company name : X Other : Labor Research Action Network (LRAN) Grant, (received) If federally funded, provide name and address of individual to whom certification of IRB approval should be sent: Name Address line 1 Address line 2 City, State, Zip Attach the research proposal/protocol that was sent to the agency , committee, or sponsor for peer-review of scientific merit if applicable. DATA COLLECTION OR COLLABORATING SITES If the participants are to be recruited from an instituti on or organization (e.g., hospital, social service agency, prison, school, etc.) or from a privately owned business (p rivate practice, local sports gym, etc.), documentation of permission from the institution must be submitted to the committee before final approval can be given. Letters of permission (on organizatio n’s letterhead) from a senior office of the institution, organization, or business should authorize t he investigator(s) to contact potential participants, to use the facilities, or access the records of th at entity. If this project is being reviewed by any other human partici pants research review group (e.g., hospital institutional review board), a copy of the approval of that institutional must be attached or a statement of the status of the review must be noted. List all collaborating and data collection sites Provide certification or letter of IRB approval Provide letters of cooperation or support (as appropriate) 1. NA Attached Will follow N/A Attached Will follow N/A 2. Attached Will follow N/A Attached Will follow N/A MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 3 of 12 1. Briefly state the problem, the present knowledge relevant to it, and the aims and significance of the proposed research. Cite appropriate literature. The sharing economy is a catch-all term for “‘peer-to-peer’ firms that connect people for the purposes of distributing, sharing, and reusing goods and servi ces” (Mathews 2014). The concept encompasses everything from multi-billion dollar companies such a s Airbnb and Uber to free durable good sharing sites such as Neighborgoods. Supporters argue the sharing economy — also referred to as the on-demand, gig or platform economy — will reverse economi c inequality, stop ecological destruction, counter materialistic tendencies, enhance worker rig hts and empower the poor. Meanwhile, critics charge that the innovation is less about wealth re-all ocation and more about wealth concentration (Evans 2013), evading regulations (Baker 2014), and “sharewash ing” (Kalamar 2013). But both supporters and critics agree that the sharing economy i s large and growing. In 2013, the global sharing economy market was valued at $26 billi on with some predicting that it would soon exceed the $110 billion U.S. chain restaurant industry (Can non & Summers 2014). By 2016, according to Pew, nearly a quarter of American adults had earned money in the ‘platform economy’ over the last year. But how does gig work affect workers in the long-term? Although some workers utilize gig economy income as a suppleme ntal strategy, sharing economy work has increasingly become an occupation of last resort for those with lower incomes. Research by the Chase Institute found that individuals wit h lower incomes ($44,800 and below) had a higher involvement in labor platforms (0.6%) compared to those with incomes in the highest quintile of $84,900 and above (0.3%) (Farrell and Greig 2017). A McKinsey Global Work Institute report (2006) also noted that lower-income households are more likely to participate in independent work out of a lack of better alternatives. Farrell and Greig (2016) found that in one in six sharing economy participants in any given month is new, and more than half of participants exit within 12 months. But for those with lower incomes and “who experienced at least one mont h of non-employment over this time frame, platforms provide a vital source of additional income” (Farrell and Greig, 2016: 10). While the platforms may be beneficial in the short-run, the question arises, what is the impact of gig economy work on a worker’s future career trajectory? To paraph rase Kalleberg (2011), is gig-based work a good or bad job? Heinrich, Mueser and Troske (2005) fo und that any employment—in temporary help services or other sectors—yields substantial benefit s compared to no employment. Other research has found that past part-time work has a negat ive effect on wages (Ferber and Waldfogel 1998) and work by Autor and Houseman (2006) sugge sted that workers placed in a temporary agency position were more vulnerable to non-employment and short periods of gainful employment. There has been no research to date on the longer-term impl ications of working in the gig economy. As a result, I plan to examine the impact of gig-b ased employment on worker life chances and future work trajectories. Does a year spent driving for Ub er or working as a TaskRabbit reduce the likelihood that a worker will find stable employment in the future? Does on-demand work simply result in a worker being relegated to a future of precarity? I am in an unique position to study this question. In 2015, I began a dissertation project to examine the social and political dimensions of this new econ omic movement. My mixed-methods dissertation, The New Entrepreneur: Worker Experiences in the Sharing Economy , examined the lived experience of Airbnb, Uber, Taskrabbit and Kitchensurfing worke rs in New York City and the socioeconomic implications of this new economic movement and increa singly uneven distributions of power. Based on nearly 80 ethnographic interviews, my research exp lored the experience of sharing economy work and how race, class and gender intersected to aff ect worker success or lead to increased precarity. A book based on my research, Hustle: Working in the Gig Economy, is currently in contract with the University of California Press. Proposed Project and Research Questions I am proposing a follow-up project to explore the impact of sharing economy work on worker careers three years later. Is gig economy work simply app-enabl ed interim work that will reduce the likelihood of gainful stable employment in the future? O r does the ‘sexiness’ of working via an online platform override any sense of it as low-skilled or interim? My research questions are as follows: As the economy improved, are/were workers able to move from sharing economy work into MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 3 of 12 1. Briefly state the problem, the present knowledge relevant to it, and the aims and significance of the proposed research. Cite appropriate literature. The sharing economy is a catch-all term for “‘peer-to-peer’ firms that connect people for the purposes of distributing, sharing, and reusing goods and servi ces” (Mathews 2014). The concept encompasses everything from multi-billion dollar companies such a s Airbnb and Uber to free durable good sharing sites such as Neighborgoods. Supporters argue the sharing economy — also referred to as the on-demand, gig or platform economy — will reverse economi c inequality, stop ecological destruction, counter materialistic tendencies, enhance worker rig hts and empower the poor. Meanwhile, critics charge that the innovation is less about wealth re-all ocation and more about wealth concentration (Evans 2013), evading regulations (Baker 2014), and “sharewash ing” (Kalamar 2013). But both supporters and critics agree that the sharing economy i s large and growing. In 2013, the global sharing economy market was valued at $26 billi on with some predicting that it would soon exceed the $110 billion U.S. chain restaurant industry (Can non & Summers 2014). By 2016, according to Pew, nearly a quarter of American adults had earned money in the ‘platform economy’ over the last year. But how does gig work affect workers in the long-term? Although some workers utilize gig economy income as a suppleme ntal strategy, sharing economy work has increasingly become an occupation of last resort for those with lower incomes. Research by the Chase Institute found that individuals wit h lower incomes ($44,800 and below) had a higher involvement in labor platforms (0.6%) compared to those with incomes in the highest quintile of $84,900 and above (0.3%) (Farrell and Greig 2017). A McKinsey Global Work Institute report (2006) also noted that lower-income households are more likely to participate in independent work out of a lack of better alternatives. Farrell and Greig (2016) found that in one in six sharing economy participants in any given month is new, and more than half of participants exit within 12 months. But for those with lower incomes and “who experienced at least one mont h of non-employment over this time frame, platforms provide a vital source of additional income” (Farrell and Greig, 2016: 10). While the platforms may be beneficial in the short-run, the question arises, what is the impact of gig economy work on a worker’s future career trajectory? To paraph rase Kalleberg (2011), is gig-based work a good or bad job? Heinrich, Mueser and Troske (2005) fo und that any employment—in temporary help services or other sectors—yields substantial benefit s compared to no employment. Other research has found that past part-time work has a negat ive effect on wages (Ferber and Waldfogel 1998) and work by Autor and Houseman (2006) sugge sted that workers placed in a temporary agency position were more vulnerable to non-employment and short periods of gainful employment. There has been no research to date on the longer-term impl ications of working in the gig economy. As a result, I plan to examine the impact of gig-b ased employment on worker life chances and future work trajectories. Does a year spent driving for Ub er or working as a TaskRabbit reduce the likelihood that a worker will find stable employment in the future? Does on-demand work simply result in a worker being relegated to a future of precarity? I am in an unique position to study this question. In 2015, I began a dissertation project to examine the social and political dimensions of this new econ omic movement. My mixed-methods dissertation, The New Entrepreneur: Worker Experiences in the Sharing Economy , examined the lived experience of Airbnb, Uber, Taskrabbit and Kitchensurfing worke rs in New York City and the socioeconomic implications of this new economic movement and increa singly uneven distributions of power. Based on nearly 80 ethnographic interviews, my research exp lored the experience of sharing economy work and how race, class and gender intersected to aff ect worker success or lead to increased precarity. A book based on my research, Hustle: Working in the Gig Economy, is currently in contract with the University of California Press. Proposed Project and Research Questions I am proposing a follow-up project to explore the impact of sharing economy work on worker careers three years later. Is gig economy work simply app-enabl ed interim work that will reduce the likelihood of gainful stable employment in the future? O r does the ‘sexiness’ of working via an online platform override any sense of it as low-skilled or interim? My research questions are as follows: As the economy improved, are/were workers able to move from sharing economy work into MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 3 of 12 1. Briefly state the problem, the present knowledge relevant to it, and the aims and significance of the proposed research. Cite appropriate literature. The sharing economy is a catch-all term for “‘peer-to-peer’ firms that connect people for the purposes of distributing, sharing, and reusing goods and servi ces” (Mathews 2014). The concept encompasses everything from multi-billion dollar companies such a s Airbnb and Uber to free durable good sharing sites such as Neighborgoods. Supporters argue the sharing economy — also referred to as the on-demand, gig or platform economy — will reverse economi c inequality, stop ecological destruction, counter materialistic tendencies, enhance worker rig hts and empower the poor. Meanwhile, critics charge that the innovation is less about wealth re-all ocation and more about wealth concentration (Evans 2013), evading regulations (Baker 2014), and “sharewash ing” (Kalamar 2013). But both supporters and critics agree that the sharing economy i s large and growing. In 2013, the global sharing economy market was valued at $26 billi on with some predicting that it would soon exceed the $110 billion U.S. chain restaurant industry (Can non & Summers 2014). By 2016, according to Pew, nearly a quarter of American adults had earned money in the ‘platform economy’ over the last year. But how does gig work affect workers in the long-term? Although some workers utilize gig economy income as a suppleme ntal strategy, sharing economy work has increasingly become an occupation of last resort for those with lower incomes. Research by the Chase Institute found that individuals wit h lower incomes ($44,800 and below) had a higher involvement in labor platforms (0.6%) compared to those with incomes in the highest quintile of $84,900 and above (0.3%) (Farrell and Greig 2017). A McKinsey Global Work Institute report (2006) also noted that lower-income households are more likely to participate in independent work out of a lack of better alternatives. Farrell and Greig (2016) found that in one in six sharing economy participants in any given month is new, and more than half of participants exit within 12 months. But for those with lower incomes and “who experienced at least one mont h of non-employment over this time frame, platforms provide a vital source of additional income” (Farrell and Greig, 2016: 10). While the platforms may be beneficial in the short-run, the question arises, what is the impact of gig economy work on a worker’s future career trajectory? To paraph rase Kalleberg (2011), is gig-based work a good or bad job? Heinrich, Mueser and Troske (2005) fo und that any employment—in temporary help services or other sectors—yields substantial benefit s compared to no employment. Other research has found that past part-time work has a negat ive effect on wages (Ferber and Waldfogel 1998) and work by Autor and Houseman (2006) sugge sted that workers placed in a temporary agency position were more vulnerable to non-employment and short periods of gainful employment. There has been no research to date on the longer-term impl ications of working in the gig economy. As a result, I plan to examine the impact of gig-b ased employment on worker life chances and future work trajectories. Does a year spent driving for Ub er or working as a TaskRabbit reduce the likelihood that a worker will find stable employment in the future? Does on-demand work simply result in a worker being relegated to a future of precarity? I am in an unique position to study this question. In 2015, I began a dissertation project to examine the social and political dimensions of this new econ omic movement. My mixed-methods dissertation, The New Entrepreneur: Worker Experiences in the Sharing Economy , examined the lived experience of Airbnb, Uber, Taskrabbit and Kitchensurfing worke rs in New York City and the socioeconomic implications of this new economic movement and increa singly uneven distributions of power. Based on nearly 80 ethnographic interviews, my research exp lored the experience of sharing economy work and how race, class and gender intersected to aff ect worker success or lead to increased precarity. A book based on my research, Hustle: Working in the Gig Economy, is currently in contract with the University of California Press. Proposed Project and Research Questions I am proposing a follow-up project to explore the impact of sharing economy work on worker careers three years later. Is gig economy work simply app-enabl ed interim work that will reduce the likelihood of gainful stable employment in the future? O r does the ‘sexiness’ of working via an online platform override any sense of it as low-skilled or interim? My research questions are as follows: As the economy improved, are/were workers able to move from sharing economy work into MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 3 of 12 1. Briefly state the problem, the present knowledge relevant to it, and the aims and significance of the proposed research. Cite appropriate literature. The sharing economy is a catch-all term for “‘peer-to-peer’ firms that connect people for the purposes of distributing, sharing, and reusing goods and servi ces” (Mathews 2014). The concept encompasses everything from multi-billion dollar companies such a s Airbnb and Uber to free durable good sharing sites such as Neighborgoods. Supporters argue the sharing economy — also referred to as the on-demand, gig or platform economy — will reverse economi c inequality, stop ecological destruction, counter materialistic tendencies, enhance worker rig hts and empower the poor. Meanwhile, critics charge that the innovation is less about wealth re-all ocation and more about wealth concentration (Evans 2013), evading regulations (Baker 2014), and “sharewash ing” (Kalamar 2013). But both supporters and critics agree that the sharing economy i s large and growing. In 2013, the global sharing economy market was valued at $26 billi on with some predicting that it would soon exceed the $110 billion U.S. chain restaurant industry (Can non & Summers 2014). By 2016, according to Pew, nearly a quarter of American adults had earned money in the ‘platform economy’ over the last year. But how does gig work affect workers in the long-term? Although some workers utilize gig economy income as a suppleme ntal strategy, sharing economy work has increasingly become an occupation of last resort for those with lower incomes. Research by the Chase Institute found that individuals wit h lower incomes ($44,800 and below) had a higher involvement in labor platforms (0.6%) compared to those with incomes in the highest quintile of $84,900 and above (0.3%) (Farrell and Greig 2017). A McKinsey Global Work Institute report (2006) also noted that lower-income households are more likely to participate in independent work out of a lack of better alternatives. Farrell and Greig (2016) found that in one in six sharing economy participants in any given month is new, and more than half of participants exit within 12 months. But for those with lower incomes and “who experienced at least one mont h of non-employment over this time frame, platforms provide a vital source of additional income” (Farrell and Greig, 2016: 10). While the platforms may be beneficial in the short-run, the question arises, what is the impact of gig economy work on a worker’s future career trajectory? To paraph rase Kalleberg (2011), is gig-based work a good or bad job? Heinrich, Mueser and Troske (2005) fo und that any employment—in temporary help services or other sectors—yields substantial benefit s compared to no employment. Other research has found that past part-time work has a negat ive effect on wages (Ferber and Waldfogel 1998) and work by Autor and Houseman (2006) sugge sted that workers placed in a temporary agency position were more vulnerable to non-employment and short periods of gainful employment. There has been no research to date on the longer-term impl ications of working in the gig economy. As a result, I plan to examine the impact of gig-b ased employment on worker life chances and future work trajectories. Does a year spent driving for Ub er or working as a TaskRabbit reduce the likelihood that a worker will find stable employment in the future? Does on-demand work simply result in a worker being relegated to a future of precarity? I am in an unique position to study this question. In 2015, I began a dissertation project to examine the social and political dimensions of this new econ omic movement. My mixed-methods dissertation, The New Entrepreneur: Worker Experiences in the Sharing Economy , examined the lived experience of Airbnb, Uber, Taskrabbit and Kitchensurfing worke rs in New York City and the socioeconomic implications of this new economic movement and increa singly uneven distributions of power. Based on nearly 80 ethnographic interviews, my research exp lored the experience of sharing economy work and how race, class and gender intersected to aff ect worker success or lead to increased precarity. A book based on my research, Hustle: Working in the Gig Economy, is currently in contract with the University of California Press. Proposed Project and Research Questions I am proposing a follow-up project to explore the impact of sharing economy work on worker careers three years later. Is gig economy work simply app-enabl ed interim work that will reduce the likelihood of gainful stable employment in the future? O r does the ‘sexiness’ of working via an online platform override any sense of it as low-skilled or interim? My research questions are as follows: As the economy improved, are/were workers able to move from sharing economy work into MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 3 of 12 1. Briefly state the problem, the present knowledge relevant to it, and the aims and significance of the proposed research. Cite appropriate literature. The sharing economy is a catch-all term for “‘peer-to-peer’ firms that connect people for the purposes of distributing, sharing, and reusing goods and servi ces” (Mathews 2014). The concept encompasses everything from multi-billion dollar companies such a s Airbnb and Uber to free durable good sharing sites such as Neighborgoods. Supporters argue the sharing economy — also referred to as the on-demand, gig or platform economy — will reverse economi c inequality, stop ecological destruction, counter materialistic tendencies, enhance worker rig hts and empower the poor. Meanwhile, critics charge that the innovation is less about wealth re-all ocation and more about wealth concentration (Evans 2013), evading regulations (Baker 2014), and “sharewash ing” (Kalamar 2013). But both supporters and critics agree that the sharing economy i s large and growing. In 2013, the global sharing economy market was valued at $26 billi on with some predicting that it would soon exceed the $110 billion U.S. chain restaurant industry (Can non & Summers 2014). By 2016, according to Pew, nearly a quarter of American adults had earned money in the ‘platform economy’ over the last year. But how does gig work affect workers in the long-term? Although some workers utilize gig economy income as a suppleme ntal strategy, sharing economy work has increasingly become an occupation of last resort for those with lower incomes. Research by the Chase Institute found that individuals wit h lower incomes ($44,800 and below) had a higher involvement in labor platforms (0.6%) compared to those with incomes in the highest quintile of $84,900 and above (0.3%) (Farrell and Greig 2017). A McKinsey Global Work Institute report (2006) also noted that lower-income households are more likely to participate in independent work out of a lack of better alternatives. Farrell and Greig (2016) found that in one in six sharing economy participants in any given month is new, and more than half of participants exit within 12 months. But for those with lower incomes and “who experienced at least one mont h of non-employment over this time frame, platforms provide a vital source of additional income” (Farrell and Greig, 2016: 10). While the platforms may be beneficial in the short-run, the question arises, what is the impact of gig economy work on a worker’s future career trajectory? To paraph rase Kalleberg (2011), is gig-based work a good or bad job? Heinrich, Mueser and Troske (2005) fo und that any employment—in temporary help services or other sectors—yields substantial benefit s compared to no employment. Other research has found that past part-time work has a negat ive effect on wages (Ferber and Waldfogel 1998) and work by Autor and Houseman (2006) sugge sted that workers placed in a temporary agency position were more vulnerable to non-employment and short periods of gainful employment. There has been no research to date on the longer-term impl ications of working in the gig economy. As a result, I plan to examine the impact of gig-b ased employment on worker life chances and future work trajectories. Does a year spent driving for Ub er or working as a TaskRabbit reduce the likelihood that a worker will find stable employment in the future? Does on-demand work simply result in a worker being relegated to a future of precarity? I am in an unique position to study this question. In 2015, I began a dissertation project to examine the social and political dimensions of this new econ omic movement. My mixed-methods dissertation, The New Entrepreneur: Worker Experiences in the Sharing Economy , examined the lived experience of Airbnb, Uber, Taskrabbit and Kitchensurfing worke rs in New York City and the socioeconomic implications of this new economic movement and increa singly uneven distributions of power. Based on nearly 80 ethnographic interviews, my research exp lored the experience of sharing economy work and how race, class and gender intersected to aff ect worker success or lead to increased precarity. A book based on my research, Hustle: Working in the Gig Economy, is currently in contract with the University of California Press. Proposed Project and Research Questions I am proposing a follow-up project to explore the impact of sharing economy work on worker careers three years later. Is gig economy work simply app-enabl ed interim work that will reduce the likelihood of gainful stable employment in the future? O r does the ‘sexiness’ of working via an online platform override any sense of it as low-skilled or interim? My research questions are as follows: As the economy improved, are/were workers able to move from sharing economy work into MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 4 of 12 full-time stable employment? How did working in the gig economy affect their future care er experiences and life chances? Were workers able to establish businesses or pursue creative care ers? How did the impact of such work on career trajectory differ by the age/race/sex of the worker or by the level of personal investment in the service? 2. Describe the tasks/tests or procedures participants will be asked to complete. (Suggestions: explain step by step what the participants will be as ked to do and distinguish those which are experimental from those which comprise routine clinical care/services. ) Attach copies of all questionnaires, testing instruments or interview protocols; include any cover letters or i nstructions to participants. Provide references on reliability and validity of published tools and written per mission to use copyrighted tests if you have not purchased the test. Research Design My earlier work involved workers for Airbnb, Uber, Taskrabbit a nd Kitchensurfing (an on- demand chef service). Data collection for this study will in clude follow-up interviews and surveys with up to 70 workers from the earlier sample. As with the earlier data collection, I will personally admin ister a demographic survey and interview each respondent using Weiss’ (1995) interview matrix to allow for a participant-directed interview. Whenever possible, interviews will be conducted in person with the majority conducted in public locations such as cafes and parks. It is expected that these follow-up interviews will also be approximately two hours long. During each interview, I will a sk open-ended questions: how workers got involved with the gig economy; how involved they remain wi th the gig economy; reasons for leaving/remaining; experiences finding work in the mainstre am economy after/while working in the gig economy; and perceived impact on their life chances and career decisions. Workers will also be given a short demographic survey that will address current age, income, edu cation level, number of hours worked each week, an assessment of their financial situations, and three words describing their experiences in the sharing economy. All interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded into thematic fields. Information from the surveys will be entered into a spreadsheet and anal yzed by calculating means. Thematic qualitative data, such as experiences after the gig economy, will be sorted into broad topical categories, coded inductively, and analyzed by examining patterns. T o preserve confidentiality, all respondents will be assigned pseudonyms. To further encourage participation in the study, workers will be given a $25 cash incentive and provided with a small snack at a local cafe during the interview. For those workers who are no longer New York local, interviews will be conducte d over the phone and recorded through NoNotes telephone recording software with their incentive p rovided via Venmo. 3. If participants will come in contact with any mechanical, electrical or other equipment, the form entitled Utilizing Research Equipment with Human Participant s must be completed by the investigator and a verified safety check. A. Description of the Human Participants and the Recruitment Procedures 1. Participant Population a. Anticipated number: Male 40 Female 30 Total 70 MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 4 of 12 full-time stable employment? How did working in the gig economy affect their future care er experiences and life chances? Were workers able to establish businesses or pursue creative care ers? How did the impact of such work on career trajectory differ by the age/race/sex of the worker or by the level of personal investment in the service? 2. Describe the tasks/tests or procedures participants will be asked to complete. (Suggestions: explain step by step what the participants will be as ked to do and distinguish those which are experimental from those which comprise routine clinical care/services. ) Attach copies of all questionnaires, testing instruments or interview protocols; include any cover letters or i nstructions to participants. Provide references on reliability and validity of published tools and written per mission to use copyrighted tests if you have not purchased the test. Research Design My earlier work involved workers for Airbnb, Uber, Taskrabbit a nd Kitchensurfing (an on- demand chef service). Data collection for this study will in clude follow-up interviews and surveys with up to 70 workers from the earlier sample. As with the earlier data collection, I will personally admin ister a demographic survey and interview each respondent using Weiss’ (1995) interview matrix to allow for a participant-directed interview. Whenever possible, interviews will be conducted in person with the majority conducted in public locations such as cafes and parks. It is expected that these follow-up interviews will also be approximately two hours long. During each interview, I will a sk open-ended questions: how workers got involved with the gig economy; how involved they remain wi th the gig economy; reasons for leaving/remaining; experiences finding work in the mainstre am economy after/while working in the gig economy; and perceived impact on their life chances and career decisions. Workers will also be given a short demographic survey that will address current age, income, edu cation level, number of hours worked each week, an assessment of their financial situations, and three words describing their experiences in the sharing economy. All interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded into thematic fields. Information from the surveys will be entered into a spreadsheet and anal yzed by calculating means. Thematic qualitative data, such as experiences after the gig economy, will be sorted into broad topical categories, coded inductively, and analyzed by examining patterns. T o preserve confidentiality, all respondents will be assigned pseudonyms. To further encourage participation in the study, workers will be given a $25 cash incentive and provided with a small snack at a local cafe during the interview. For those workers who are no longer New York local, interviews will be conducte d over the phone and recorded through NoNotes telephone recording software with their incentive p rovided via Venmo. 3. If participants will come in contact with any mechanical, electrical or other equipment, the form entitled Utilizing Research Equipment with Human Participant s must be completed by the investigator and a verified safety check. A. Description of the Human Participants and the Recruitment Procedures 1. Participant Population a. Anticipated number: Male 40 Female 30 Total 70 MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 4 of 12 full-time stable employment? How did working in the gig economy affect their future care er experiences and life chances? Were workers able to establish businesses or pursue creative care ers? How did the impact of such work on career trajectory differ by the age/race/sex of the worker or by the level of personal investment in the service? 2. Describe the tasks/tests or procedures participants will be asked to complete. (Suggestions: explain step by step what the participants will be as ked to do and distinguish those which are experimental from those which comprise routine clinical care/services. ) Attach copies of all questionnaires, testing instruments or interview protocols; include any cover letters or i nstructions to participants. Provide references on reliability and validity of published tools and written per mission to use copyrighted tests if you have not purchased the test. Research Design My earlier work involved workers for Airbnb, Uber, Taskrabbit a nd Kitchensurfing (an on- demand chef service). Data collection for this study will in clude follow-up interviews and surveys with up to 70 workers from the earlier sample. As with the earlier data collection, I will personally admin ister a demographic survey and interview each respondent using Weiss’ (1995) interview matrix to allow for a participant-directed interview. Whenever possible, interviews will be conducted in person with the majority conducted in public locations such as cafes and parks. It is expected that these follow-up interviews will also be approximately two hours long. During each interview, I will a sk open-ended questions: how workers got involved with the gig economy; how involved they remain wi th the gig economy; reasons for leaving/remaining; experiences finding work in the mainstre am economy after/while working in the gig economy; and perceived impact on their life chances and career decisions. Workers will also be given a short demographic survey that will address current age, income, edu cation level, number of hours worked each week, an assessment of their financial situations, and three words describing their experiences in the sharing economy. All interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded into thematic fields. Information from the surveys will be entered into a spreadsheet and anal yzed by calculating means. Thematic qualitative data, such as experiences after the gig economy, will be sorted into broad topical categories, coded inductively, and analyzed by examining patterns. T o preserve confidentiality, all respondents will be assigned pseudonyms. To further encourage participation in the study, workers will be given a $25 cash incentive and provided with a small snack at a local cafe during the interview. For those workers who are no longer New York local, interviews will be conducte d over the phone and recorded through NoNotes telephone recording software with their incentive p rovided via Venmo. 3. If participants will come in contact with any mechanical, electrical or other equipment, the form entitled Utilizing Research Equipment with Human Participant s must be completed by the investigator and a verified safety check. A. Description of the Human Participants and the Recruitment Procedures 1. Participant Population a. Anticipated number: Male 40 Female 30 Total 70 MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 4 of 12 full-time stable employment? How did working in the gig economy affect their future care er experiences and life chances? Were workers able to establish businesses or pursue creative care ers? How did the impact of such work on career trajectory differ by the age/race/sex of the worker or by the level of personal investment in the service? 2. Describe the tasks/tests or procedures participants will be asked to complete. (Suggestions: explain step by step what the participants will be as ked to do and distinguish those which are experimental from those which comprise routine clinical care/services. ) Attach copies of all questionnaires, testing instruments or interview protocols; include any cover letters or i nstructions to participants. Provide references on reliability and validity of published tools and written per mission to use copyrighted tests if you have not purchased the test. Research Design My earlier work involved workers for Airbnb, Uber, Taskrabbit a nd Kitchensurfing (an on- demand chef service). Data collection for this study will in clude follow-up interviews and surveys with up to 70 workers from the earlier sample. As with the earlier data collection, I will personally admin ister a demographic survey and interview each respondent using Weiss’ (1995) interview matrix to allow for a participant-directed interview. Whenever possible, interviews will be conducted in person with the majority conducted in public locations such as cafes and parks. It is expected that these follow-up interviews will also be approximately two hours long. During each interview, I will a sk open-ended questions: how workers got involved with the gig economy; how involved they remain wi th the gig economy; reasons for leaving/remaining; experiences finding work in the mainstre am economy after/while working in the gig economy; and perceived impact on their life chances and career decisions. Workers will also be given a short demographic survey that will address current age, income, edu cation level, number of hours worked each week, an assessment of their financial situations, and three words describing their experiences in the sharing economy. All interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded into thematic fields. Information from the surveys will be entered into a spreadsheet and anal yzed by calculating means. Thematic qualitative data, such as experiences after the gig economy, will be sorted into broad topical categories, coded inductively, and analyzed by examining patterns. T o preserve confidentiality, all respondents will be assigned pseudonyms. To further encourage participation in the study, workers will be given a $25 cash incentive and provided with a small snack at a local cafe during the interview. For those workers who are no longer New York local, interviews will be conducte d over the phone and recorded through NoNotes telephone recording software with their incentive p rovided via Venmo. 3. If participants will come in contact with any mechanical, electrical or other equipment, the form entitled Utilizing Research Equipment with Human Participant s must be completed by the investigator and a verified safety check. A. Description of the Human Participants and the Recruitment Procedures 1. Participant Population a. Anticipated number: Male 40 Female 30 Total 70 MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 4 of 12 full-time stable employment? How did working in the gig economy affect their future care er experiences and life chances? Were workers able to establish businesses or pursue creative care ers? How did the impact of such work on career trajectory differ by the age/race/sex of the worker or by the level of personal investment in the service? 2. Describe the tasks/tests or procedures participants will be asked to complete. (Suggestions: explain step by step what the participants will be as ked to do and distinguish those which are experimental from those which comprise routine clinical care/services. ) Attach copies of all questionnaires, testing instruments or interview protocols; include any cover letters or i nstructions to participants. Provide references on reliability and validity of published tools and written per mission to use copyrighted tests if you have not purchased the test. Research Design My earlier work involved workers for Airbnb, Uber, Taskrabbit a nd Kitchensurfing (an on- demand chef service). Data collection for this study will in clude follow-up interviews and surveys with up to 70 workers from the earlier sample. As with the earlier data collection, I will personally admin ister a demographic survey and interview each respondent using Weiss’ (1995) interview matrix to allow for a participant-directed interview. Whenever possible, interviews will be conducted in person with the majority conducted in public locations such as cafes and parks. It is expected that these follow-up interviews will also be approximately two hours long. During each interview, I will a sk open-ended questions: how workers got involved with the gig economy; how involved they remain wi th the gig economy; reasons for leaving/remaining; experiences finding work in the mainstre am economy after/while working in the gig economy; and perceived impact on their life chances and career decisions. Workers will also be given a short demographic survey that will address current age, income, edu cation level, number of hours worked each week, an assessment of their financial situations, and three words describing their experiences in the sharing economy. All interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded into thematic fields. Information from the surveys will be entered into a spreadsheet and anal yzed by calculating means. Thematic qualitative data, such as experiences after the gig economy, will be sorted into broad topical categories, coded inductively, and analyzed by examining patterns. T o preserve confidentiality, all respondents will be assigned pseudonyms. To further encourage participation in the study, workers will be given a $25 cash incentive and provided with a small snack at a local cafe during the interview. For those workers who are no longer New York local, interviews will be conducte d over the phone and recorded through NoNotes telephone recording software with their incentive p rovided via Venmo. 3. If participants will come in contact with any mechanical, electrical or other equipment, the form entitled Utilizing Research Equipment with Human Participant s must be completed by the investigator and a verified safety check. A. Description of the Human Participants and the Recruitment Procedures 1. Participant Population a. Anticipated number: Male 40 Female 30 Total 70 MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 5 of 12 (This number should be the number of participants you will enroll in order to get the adequate data sets you will need. If multiple sites are to be used , provide an estimate of the number in each category to be recruited from each site. In addition, if you plan to study only one sex , provide scientific rationale in the inclusion/exclusion section of the application.) b. Age Range (check all that apply): 0 – 7 yrs. (submit parental permission form) 8 – 17 yrs. (submit child’s assent form, parental permission form) 18 – 64 yrs. (submit consent form) 65+ yrs. (submit consent form) c. Source/type of participants: (check all that apply) Mercy College employees Mercy College students inpatients or outpatients Community volunteers other: specify State any relationship (past or present) the researcher may have wi th the potential participants: I previously interviewed these workers for my doctoral dissertation at th e CUNY Graduate Center. d. Location of participants during research data collection (check all that apply): Participant’s home Mercy College locations: specify Local hospitals: specify community settings: specify Local restaurants and parks other institutions: specify elementary schools: specify secondary schools: specify other: specify e. Describe populations to be excluded from the research. Please describe procedures to assure equitable selection of participants. Researchers should not select partici pants on the basis of discriminatory criteria. Selection criteria that exclude one sex, racial , or ethnic group require a clear scientific rationale for the exclusion. My research looks at the impact of gig work on worker careers. Individuals who ha ve never worked for Uber/Lyft, Airbnb, TaskRabbit, or Kitchensurfing or other gig economy platf orms will be excluded. Additionally, workers who were not previously interviewed will also be excluded. f. Special populations to be included in the research (check all that apply): minors under age 18 pregnant women fetus/fetal tissue prisoners economically disadvantaged MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 5 of 12 (This number should be the number of participants you will enroll in order to get the adequate data sets you will need. If multiple sites are to be used , provide an estimate of the number in each category to be recruited from each site. In addition, if you plan to study only one sex , provide scientific rationale in the inclusion/exclusion section of the application.) b. Age Range (check all that apply): 0 – 7 yrs. (submit parental permission form) 8 – 17 yrs. (submit child’s assent form, parental permission form) 18 – 64 yrs. (submit consent form) 65+ yrs. (submit consent form) c. Source/type of participants: (check all that apply) Mercy College employees Mercy College students inpatients or outpatients Community volunteers other: specify State any relationship (past or present) the researcher may have wi th the potential participants: I previously interviewed these workers for my doctoral dissertation at th e CUNY Graduate Center. d. Location of participants during research data collection (check all that apply): Participant’s home Mercy College locations: specify Local hospitals: specify community settings: specify Local restaurants and parks other institutions: specify elementary schools: specify secondary schools: specify other: specify e. Describe populations to be excluded from the research. Please describe procedures to assure equitable selection of participants. Researchers should not select partici pants on the basis of discriminatory criteria. Selection criteria that exclude one sex, racial , or ethnic group require a clear scientific rationale for the exclusion. My research looks at the impact of gig work on worker careers. Individuals who ha ve never worked for Uber/Lyft, Airbnb, TaskRabbit, or Kitchensurfing or other gig economy platf orms will be excluded. Additionally, workers who were not previously interviewed will also be excluded. f. Special populations to be included in the research (check all that apply): minors under age 18 pregnant women fetus/fetal tissue prisoners economically disadvantaged MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 5 of 12 (This number should be the number of participants you will enroll in order to get the adequate data sets you will need. If multiple sites are to be used , provide an estimate of the number in each category to be recruited from each site. In addition, if you plan to study only one sex , provide scientific rationale in the inclusion/exclusion section of the application.) b. Age Range (check all that apply): 0 – 7 yrs. (submit parental permission form) 8 – 17 yrs. (submit child’s assent form, parental permission form) 18 – 64 yrs. (submit consent form) 65+ yrs. (submit consent form) c. Source/type of participants: (check all that apply) Mercy College employees Mercy College students inpatients or outpatients Community volunteers other: specify State any relationship (past or present) the researcher may have wi th the potential participants: I previously interviewed these workers for my doctoral dissertation at th e CUNY Graduate Center. d. Location of participants during research data collection (check all that apply): Participant’s home Mercy College locations: specify Local hospitals: specify community settings: specify Local restaurants and parks other institutions: specify elementary schools: specify secondary schools: specify other: specify e. Describe populations to be excluded from the research. Please describe procedures to assure equitable selection of participants. Researchers should not select partici pants on the basis of discriminatory criteria. Selection criteria that exclude one sex, racial , or ethnic group require a clear scientific rationale for the exclusion. My research looks at the impact of gig work on worker careers. Individuals who ha ve never worked for Uber/Lyft, Airbnb, TaskRabbit, or Kitchensurfing or other gig economy platf orms will be excluded. Additionally, workers who were not previously interviewed will also be excluded. f. Special populations to be included in the research (check all that apply): minors under age 18 pregnant women fetus/fetal tissue prisoners economically disadvantaged MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 5 of 12 (This number should be the number of participants you will enroll in order to get the adequate data sets you will need. If multiple sites are to be used , provide an estimate of the number in each category to be recruited from each site. In addition, if you plan to study only one sex , provide scientific rationale in the inclusion/exclusion section of the application.) b. Age Range (check all that apply): 0 – 7 yrs. (submit parental permission form) 8 – 17 yrs. (submit child’s assent form, parental permission form) 18 – 64 yrs. (submit consent form) 65+ yrs. (submit consent form) c. Source/type of participants: (check all that apply) Mercy College employees Mercy College students inpatients or outpatients Community volunteers other: specify State any relationship (past or present) the researcher may have wi th the potential participants: I previously interviewed these workers for my doctoral dissertation at th e CUNY Graduate Center. d. Location of participants during research data collection (check all that apply): Participant’s home Mercy College locations: specify Local hospitals: specify community settings: specify Local restaurants and parks other institutions: specify elementary schools: specify secondary schools: specify other: specify e. Describe populations to be excluded from the research. Please describe procedures to assure equitable selection of participants. Researchers should not select partici pants on the basis of discriminatory criteria. Selection criteria that exclude one sex, racial , or ethnic group require a clear scientific rationale for the exclusion. My research looks at the impact of gig work on worker careers. Individuals who ha ve never worked for Uber/Lyft, Airbnb, TaskRabbit, or Kitchensurfing or other gig economy platf orms will be excluded. Additionally, workers who were not previously interviewed will also be excluded. f. Special populations to be included in the research (check all that apply): minors under age 18 pregnant women fetus/fetal tissue prisoners economically disadvantaged MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 5 of 12 (This number should be the number of participants you will enroll in order to get the adequate data sets you will need. If multiple sites are to be used , provide an estimate of the number in each category to be recruited from each site. In addition, if you plan to study only one sex , provide scientific rationale in the inclusion/exclusion section of the application.) b. Age Range (check all that apply): 0 – 7 yrs. (submit parental permission form) 8 – 17 yrs. (submit child’s assent form, parental permission form) 18 – 64 yrs. (submit consent form) 65+ yrs. (submit consent form) c. Source/type of participants: (check all that apply) Mercy College employees Mercy College students inpatients or outpatients Community volunteers other: specify State any relationship (past or present) the researcher may have wi th the potential participants: I previously interviewed these workers for my doctoral dissertation at th e CUNY Graduate Center. d. Location of participants during research data collection (check all that apply): Participant’s home Mercy College locations: specify Local hospitals: specify community settings: specify Local restaurants and parks other institutions: specify elementary schools: specify secondary schools: specify other: specify e. Describe populations to be excluded from the research. Please describe procedures to assure equitable selection of participants. Researchers should not select partici pants on the basis of discriminatory criteria. Selection criteria that exclude one sex, racial , or ethnic group require a clear scientific rationale for the exclusion. My research looks at the impact of gig work on worker careers. Individuals who ha ve never worked for Uber/Lyft, Airbnb, TaskRabbit, or Kitchensurfing or other gig economy platf orms will be excluded. Additionally, workers who were not previously interviewed will also be excluded. f. Special populations to be included in the research (check all that apply): minors under age 18 pregnant women fetus/fetal tissue prisoners economically disadvantaged MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 6 of 12 other: specify g. Provide rationale for using special populations. The groups listed in ( f) above are considered “vulnerable” or require special consideration by the f ederal regulatory agencies and by the IRB. NA 2. Recruitment Procedures a. Describe how participants will be identified and recruited. Attach all recruitment information, e.g., advertisements, bulletin board notices, and recruitment letters for all types of media (printed, radio, email, electronic, TV, or Internet). Participants will be the individuals I previously interviewed as part of my dissertation on the gig economy. I will email workers to thank them for their earlier participation, and to inquire about their interest and availability to be interviewed for a follow-up intervi ew. Dear XXX, In 2015, you participated in an interview and survey on your experiences w orking in the sharing economy (Uber/Lyft/UberEats, Airbnb, TaskRabbit or Kitchensurfing) as part of my dissertation research. I want to thank you again for your participation in the study and to ask if you would be willing to participate in a follow-up interview and survey to learn more about the impact of the sharing economy on your career. Whether you are still part of the sharing economy, or have left , or moved to a different platform, I would like to learn more about your experience three years later. As a token of gratitude for your time, you will be given a $25 cash incentive at the conclusion of the interview and survey and provided with lunch or a snack during the interview. The interview would be at a time and place of your choosing and that is conve nient for you. Please let me know if you are interested in participating. Best, Alexandrea b. Initial Contact. Describe who will make initial contact. How? If participants are c hosen from records, indicate who gave approval for the use of the records. If records are “privat e” medical or student records, provide the protocol, consent forms, letters, etc., for securing consent of the participants for the records. Written documentation for cooperation/permission from the holder or custodian of the r ecords should be attached. (Initial contact of participants identified through a records searc h must be made by the official holder of the record, i.e. primary physician, therapist, public school offi cial.) MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 6 of 12 other: specify g. Provide rationale for using special populations. The groups listed in ( f) above are considered “vulnerable” or require special consideration by the f ederal regulatory agencies and by the IRB. NA 2. Recruitment Procedures a. Describe how participants will be identified and recruited. Attach all recruitment information, e.g., advertisements, bulletin board notices, and recruitment letters for all types of media (printed, radio, email, electronic, TV, or Internet). Participants will be the individuals I previously interviewed as part of my dissertation on the gig economy. I will email workers to thank them for their earlier participation, and to inquire about their interest and availability to be interviewed for a follow-up intervi ew. Dear XXX, In 2015, you participated in an interview and survey on your experiences w orking in the sharing economy (Uber/Lyft/UberEats, Airbnb, TaskRabbit or Kitchensurfing) as part of my dissertation research. I want to thank you again for your participation in the study and to ask if you would be willing to participate in a follow-up interview and survey to learn more about the impact of the sharing economy on your career. Whether you are still part of the sharing economy, or have left , or moved to a different platform, I would like to learn more about your experience three years later. As a token of gratitude for your time, you will be given a $25 cash incentive at the conclusion of the interview and survey and provided with lunch or a snack during the interview. The interview would be at a time and place of your choosing and that is conve nient for you. Please let me know if you are interested in participating. Best, Alexandrea b. Initial Contact. Describe who will make initial contact. How? If participants are c hosen from records, indicate who gave approval for the use of the records. If records are “privat e” medical or student records, provide the protocol, consent forms, letters, etc., for securing consent of the participants for the records. Written documentation for cooperation/permission from the holder or custodian of the r ecords should be attached. (Initial contact of participants identified through a records searc h must be made by the official holder of the record, i.e. primary physician, therapist, public school offi cial.) MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 6 of 12 other: specify g. Provide rationale for using special populations. The groups listed in ( f) above are considered “vulnerable” or require special consideration by the f ederal regulatory agencies and by the IRB. NA 2. Recruitment Procedures a. Describe how participants will be identified and recruited. Attach all recruitment information, e.g., advertisements, bulletin board notices, and recruitment letters for all types of media (printed, radio, email, electronic, TV, or Internet). Participants will be the individuals I previously interviewed as part of my dissertation on the gig economy. I will email workers to thank them for their earlier participation, and to inquire about their interest and availability to be interviewed for a follow-up intervi ew. Dear XXX, In 2015, you participated in an interview and survey on your experiences w orking in the sharing economy (Uber/Lyft/UberEats, Airbnb, TaskRabbit or Kitchensurfing) as part of my dissertation research. I want to thank you again for your participation in the study and to ask if you would be willing to participate in a follow-up interview and survey to learn more about the impact of the sharing economy on your career. Whether you are still part of the sharing economy, or have left , or moved to a different platform, I would like to learn more about your experience three years later. As a token of gratitude for your time, you will be given a $25 cash incentive at the conclusion of the interview and survey and provided with lunch or a snack during the interview. The interview would be at a time and place of your choosing and that is conve nient for you. Please let me know if you are interested in participating. Best, Alexandrea b. Initial Contact. Describe who will make initial contact. How? If participants are c hosen from records, indicate who gave approval for the use of the records. If records are “privat e” medical or student records, provide the protocol, consent forms, letters, etc., for securing consent of the participants for the records. Written documentation for cooperation/permission from the holder or custodian of the r ecords should be attached. (Initial contact of participants identified through a records searc h must be made by the official holder of the record, i.e. primary physician, therapist, public school offi cial.) MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 6 of 12 other: specify g. Provide rationale for using special populations. The groups listed in ( f) above are considered “vulnerable” or require special consideration by the f ederal regulatory agencies and by the IRB. NA 2. Recruitment Procedures a. Describe how participants will be identified and recruited. Attach all recruitment information, e.g., advertisements, bulletin board notices, and recruitment letters for all types of media (printed, radio, email, electronic, TV, or Internet). Participants will be the individuals I previously interviewed as part of my dissertation on the gig economy. I will email workers to thank them for their earlier participation, and to inquire about their interest and availability to be interviewed for a follow-up intervi ew. Dear XXX, In 2015, you participated in an interview and survey on your experiences w orking in the sharing economy (Uber/Lyft/UberEats, Airbnb, TaskRabbit or Kitchensurfing) as part of my dissertation research. I want to thank you again for your participation in the study and to ask if you would be willing to participate in a follow-up interview and survey to learn more about the impact of the sharing economy on your career. Whether you are still part of the sharing economy, or have left , or moved to a different platform, I would like to learn more about your experience three years later. As a token of gratitude for your time, you will be given a $25 cash incentive at the conclusion of the interview and survey and provided with lunch or a snack during the interview. The interview would be at a time and place of your choosing and that is conve nient for you. Please let me know if you are interested in participating. Best, Alexandrea b. Initial Contact. Describe who will make initial contact. How? If participants are c hosen from records, indicate who gave approval for the use of the records. If records are “privat e” medical or student records, provide the protocol, consent forms, letters, etc., for securing consent of the participants for the records. Written documentation for cooperation/permission from the holder or custodian of the r ecords should be attached. (Initial contact of participants identified through a records searc h must be made by the official holder of the record, i.e. primary physician, therapist, public school offi cial.) MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 6 of 12 other: specify g. Provide rationale for using special populations. The groups listed in ( f) above are considered “vulnerable” or require special consideration by the f ederal regulatory agencies and by the IRB. NA 2. Recruitment Procedures a. Describe how participants will be identified and recruited. Attach all recruitment information, e.g., advertisements, bulletin board notices, and recruitment letters for all types of media (printed, radio, email, electronic, TV, or Internet). Participants will be the individuals I previously interviewed as part of my dissertation on the gig economy. I will email workers to thank them for their earlier participation, and to inquire about their interest and availability to be interviewed for a follow-up intervi ew. Dear XXX, In 2015, you participated in an interview and survey on your experiences w orking in the sharing economy (Uber/Lyft/UberEats, Airbnb, TaskRabbit or Kitchensurfing) as part of my dissertation research. I want to thank you again for your participation in the study and to ask if you would be willing to participate in a follow-up interview and survey to learn more about the impact of the sharing economy on your career. Whether you are still part of the sharing economy, or have left , or moved to a different platform, I would like to learn more about your experience three years later. As a token of gratitude for your time, you will be given a $25 cash incentive at the conclusion of the interview and survey and provided with lunch or a snack during the interview. The interview would be at a time and place of your choosing and that is conve nient for you. Please let me know if you are interested in participating. Best, Alexandrea b. Initial Contact. Describe who will make initial contact. How? If participants are c hosen from records, indicate who gave approval for the use of the records. If records are “privat e” medical or student records, provide the protocol, consent forms, letters, etc., for securing consent of the participants for the records. Written documentation for cooperation/permission from the holder or custodian of the r ecords should be attached. (Initial contact of participants identified through a records searc h must be made by the official holder of the record, i.e. primary physician, therapist, public school offi cial.) MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 7 of 12 The initial contact will be by the primary investigator and workers will be contacted via email. c. List criteria for inclusion and exclusion of participants in this study. 1) Inclusion: Current or former worker for a gig platform, including Uber/Lyft, Airbnb, TaskR abbit, or Kitchensurfing or other gig economy platforms will be excluded. 2) Exclusion: My research looks at the impact of gig work on worker careers. Individuals who ha ve never worked for Uber/Lyft, Airbnb, TaskRabbit, or Kitchensurfing or other gig economy platf orms, and who were not previously interviewed, will be excluded. 3) How will the inclusion/exclusion criteria be assessed and by wh om? I will be utilizing my earlier list of research participants, all of whom participated in the gig economy. d. Will participants receive incentives before or rewards after the study (e.g., academic credit , money)? If yes, explain. (Note: this information must be outlined in the consent document.) Yes No Workers will be given a $ 25 incentive and small meal for participating in the interview and survey. e. Will the participants be charged for research-related procedures? For example, will parti cipants be charged for extra tests/services related to the research? If yes, explain charges, including estimated amounts. Will there be financial coverage for the extra costs? If yes, explain. (Note: this information must be included in the consent document.) Yes No NA MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 7 of 12 The initial contact will be by the primary investigator and workers will be contacted via email. c. List criteria for inclusion and exclusion of participants in this study. 1) Inclusion: Current or former worker for a gig platform, including Uber/Lyft, Airbnb, TaskR abbit, or Kitchensurfing or other gig economy platforms will be excluded. 2) Exclusion: My research looks at the impact of gig work on worker careers. Individuals who ha ve never worked for Uber/Lyft, Airbnb, TaskRabbit, or Kitchensurfing or other gig economy platf orms, and who were not previously interviewed, will be excluded. 3) How will the inclusion/exclusion criteria be assessed and by wh om? I will be utilizing my earlier list of research participants, all of whom participated in the gig economy. d. Will participants receive incentives before or rewards after the study (e.g., academic credit , money)? If yes, explain. (Note: this information must be outlined in the consent document.) Yes No Workers will be given a $ 25 incentive and small meal for participating in the interview and survey. e. Will the participants be charged for research-related procedures? For example, will parti cipants be charged for extra tests/services related to the research? If yes, explain charges, including estimated amounts. Will there be financial coverage for the extra costs? If yes, explain. (Note: this information must be included in the consent document.) Yes No NA MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 7 of 12 The initial contact will be by the primary investigator and workers will be contacted via email. c. List criteria for inclusion and exclusion of participants in this study. 1) Inclusion: Current or former worker for a gig platform, including Uber/Lyft, Airbnb, TaskR abbit, or Kitchensurfing or other gig economy platforms will be excluded. 2) Exclusion: My research looks at the impact of gig work on worker careers. Individuals who ha ve never worked for Uber/Lyft, Airbnb, TaskRabbit, or Kitchensurfing or other gig economy platf orms, and who were not previously interviewed, will be excluded. 3) How will the inclusion/exclusion criteria be assessed and by wh om? I will be utilizing my earlier list of research participants, all of whom participated in the gig economy. d. Will participants receive incentives before or rewards after the study (e.g., academic credit , money)? If yes, explain. (Note: this information must be outlined in the consent document.) Yes No Workers will be given a $ 25 incentive and small meal for participating in the interview and survey. e. Will the participants be charged for research-related procedures? For example, will parti cipants be charged for extra tests/services related to the research? If yes, explain charges, including estimated amounts. Will there be financial coverage for the extra costs? If yes, explain. (Note: this information must be included in the consent document.) Yes No NA MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 7 of 12 The initial contact will be by the primary investigator and workers will be contacted via email. c. List criteria for inclusion and exclusion of participants in this study. 1) Inclusion: Current or former worker for a gig platform, including Uber/Lyft, Airbnb, TaskR abbit, or Kitchensurfing or other gig economy platforms will be excluded. 2) Exclusion: My research looks at the impact of gig work on worker careers. Individuals who ha ve never worked for Uber/Lyft, Airbnb, TaskRabbit, or Kitchensurfing or other gig economy platf orms, and who were not previously interviewed, will be excluded. 3) How will the inclusion/exclusion criteria be assessed and by wh om? I will be utilizing my earlier list of research participants, all of whom participated in the gig economy. d. Will participants receive incentives before or rewards after the study (e.g., academic credit , money)? If yes, explain. (Note: this information must be outlined in the consent document.) Yes No Workers will be given a $ 25 incentive and small meal for participating in the interview and survey. e. Will the participants be charged for research-related procedures? For example, will parti cipants be charged for extra tests/services related to the research? If yes, explain charges, including estimated amounts. Will there be financial coverage for the extra costs? If yes, explain. (Note: this information must be included in the consent document.) Yes No NA MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 7 of 12 The initial contact will be by the primary investigator and workers will be contacted via email. c. List criteria for inclusion and exclusion of participants in this study. 1) Inclusion: Current or former worker for a gig platform, including Uber/Lyft, Airbnb, TaskR abbit, or Kitchensurfing or other gig economy platforms will be excluded. 2) Exclusion: My research looks at the impact of gig work on worker careers. Individuals who ha ve never worked for Uber/Lyft, Airbnb, TaskRabbit, or Kitchensurfing or other gig economy platf orms, and who were not previously interviewed, will be excluded. 3) How will the inclusion/exclusion criteria be assessed and by wh om? I will be utilizing my earlier list of research participants, all of whom participated in the gig economy. d. Will participants receive incentives before or rewards after the study (e.g., academic credit , money)? If yes, explain. (Note: this information must be outlined in the consent document.) Yes No Workers will be given a $ 25 incentive and small meal for participating in the interview and survey. e. Will the participants be charged for research-related procedures? For example, will parti cipants be charged for extra tests/services related to the research? If yes, explain charges, including estimated amounts. Will there be financial coverage for the extra costs? If yes, explain. (Note: this information must be included in the consent document.) Yes No NA MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 8 of 12 B. Risks and Benefits of the Research 1. Identify the risks (current and potential) and describe the expected frequency, degree of severity, and potential reversibility. Include any potential late effects. (Note: risks can be psychological , physical, social, economic, or legal.) The risks of this research are minimal. In the earlier research, workers often expres sed appreciation for the opportunity to talk about their gig economy work and often described the experience as enjoyable. 2. Does the research involve (check all that apply): administration of drugs, and chemical or biological agents administration of physical stimuli changes in diet or exercise use of private records (medical or educational records) possible invasion of privacy of participant or family deprivation of physiological requirements such as nutrition or sleep manipulation of psychological or social variables such as sensory deprivatio n, social isolation, psychological stresses the collection of personal or sensitive information in surveys or intervi ews use of a deceptive technique (If use of deception is part of the experimental protocol, the protocol must include a “debriefing procedure” [provide this procedure for IRB review] whi ch will be followed upon completion of the study, or withdrawal of the participants.) presentation of materials that participants might consider offensive, threatening, or degrading other risks: specify 3. Describe the precautions taken to minimize risk: I will protect participant confidentiality by coding responses and keeping pers onally identifiable information under lock and key, in a separate location. Participants will not be referred t o by name in the final research product and identifying characteristics will be changed or omitted to further pr otect your privacy. No one will have access to the data except for Alexandrea Ravenelle. a. Care of participants in case of an accident: Describe the provisi ons that have been made for the care of the participant in the event of an accident or complication related to the research procedures. (Note: This section may not apply to Category I or II research. Also , unless specific sponsored contracts exist to cover research-related injuries, the standard treat ment compensation language must be included in the consent form [see sample].) NA 4. Why are the risks and inconveniences mentioned above reasonable? W hat is the expected scientific yield from the project? Please justify the risks in relation to the anticipated benefits to the participants and in relation to the importance of the knowledge that may reasonably be expected to re sult from the research. MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 8 of 12 B. Risks and Benefits of the Research 1. Identify the risks (current and potential) and describe the expected frequency, degree of severity, and potential reversibility. Include any potential late effects. (Note: risks can be psychological , physical, social, economic, or legal.) The risks of this research are minimal. In the earlier research, workers often expres sed appreciation for the opportunity to talk about their gig economy work and often described the experience as enjoyable. 2. Does the research involve (check all that apply): administration of drugs, and chemical or biological agents administration of physical stimuli changes in diet or exercise use of private records (medical or educational records) possible invasion of privacy of participant or family deprivation of physiological requirements such as nutrition or sleep manipulation of psychological or social variables such as sensory deprivatio n, social isolation, psychological stresses the collection of personal or sensitive information in surveys or intervi ews use of a deceptive technique (If use of deception is part of the experimental protocol, the protocol must include a “debriefing procedure” [provide this procedure for IRB review] whi ch will be followed upon completion of the study, or withdrawal of the participants.) presentation of materials that participants might consider offensive, threatening, or degrading other risks: specify 3. Describe the precautions taken to minimize risk: I will protect participant confidentiality by coding responses and keeping pers onally identifiable information under lock and key, in a separate location. Participants will not be referred t o by name in the final research product and identifying characteristics will be changed or omitted to further pr otect your privacy. No one will have access to the data except for Alexandrea Ravenelle. a. Care of participants in case of an accident: Describe the provisi ons that have been made for the care of the participant in the event of an accident or complication related to the research procedures. (Note: This section may not apply to Category I or II research. Also , unless specific sponsored contracts exist to cover research-related injuries, the standard treat ment compensation language must be included in the consent form [see sample].) NA 4. Why are the risks and inconveniences mentioned above reasonable? W hat is the expected scientific yield from the project? Please justify the risks in relation to the anticipated benefits to the participants and in relation to the importance of the knowledge that may reasonably be expected to re sult from the research. MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 8 of 12 B. Risks and Benefits of the Research 1. Identify the risks (current and potential) and describe the expected frequency, degree of severity, and potential reversibility. Include any potential late effects. (Note: risks can be psychological , physical, social, economic, or legal.) The risks of this research are minimal. In the earlier research, workers often expres sed appreciation for the opportunity to talk about their gig economy work and often described the experience as enjoyable. 2. Does the research involve (check all that apply): administration of drugs, and chemical or biological agents administration of physical stimuli changes in diet or exercise use of private records (medical or educational records) possible invasion of privacy of participant or family deprivation of physiological requirements such as nutrition or sleep manipulation of psychological or social variables such as sensory deprivatio n, social isolation, psychological stresses the collection of personal or sensitive information in surveys or intervi ews use of a deceptive technique (If use of deception is part of the experimental protocol, the protocol must include a “debriefing procedure” [provide this procedure for IRB review] whi ch will be followed upon completion of the study, or withdrawal of the participants.) presentation of materials that participants might consider offensive, threatening, or degrading other risks: specify 3. Describe the precautions taken to minimize risk: I will protect participant confidentiality by coding responses and keeping pers onally identifiable information under lock and key, in a separate location. Participants will not be referred t o by name in the final research product and identifying characteristics will be changed or omitted to further pr otect your privacy. No one will have access to the data except for Alexandrea Ravenelle. a. Care of participants in case of an accident: Describe the provisi ons that have been made for the care of the participant in the event of an accident or complication related to the research procedures. (Note: This section may not apply to Category I or II research. Also , unless specific sponsored contracts exist to cover research-related injuries, the standard treat ment compensation language must be included in the consent form [see sample].) NA 4. Why are the risks and inconveniences mentioned above reasonable? W hat is the expected scientific yield from the project? Please justify the risks in relation to the anticipated benefits to the participants and in relation to the importance of the knowledge that may reasonably be expected to re sult from the research. MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 8 of 12 B. Risks and Benefits of the Research 1. Identify the risks (current and potential) and describe the expected frequency, degree of severity, and potential reversibility. Include any potential late effects. (Note: risks can be psychological , physical, social, economic, or legal.) The risks of this research are minimal. In the earlier research, workers often expres sed appreciation for the opportunity to talk about their gig economy work and often described the experience as enjoyable. 2. Does the research involve (check all that apply): administration of drugs, and chemical or biological agents administration of physical stimuli changes in diet or exercise use of private records (medical or educational records) possible invasion of privacy of participant or family deprivation of physiological requirements such as nutrition or sleep manipulation of psychological or social variables such as sensory deprivatio n, social isolation, psychological stresses the collection of personal or sensitive information in surveys or intervi ews use of a deceptive technique (If use of deception is part of the experimental protocol, the protocol must include a “debriefing procedure” [provide this procedure for IRB review] whi ch will be followed upon completion of the study, or withdrawal of the participants.) presentation of materials that participants might consider offensive, threatening, or degrading other risks: specify 3. Describe the precautions taken to minimize risk: I will protect participant confidentiality by coding responses and keeping pers onally identifiable information under lock and key, in a separate location. Participants will not be referred t o by name in the final research product and identifying characteristics will be changed or omitted to further pr otect your privacy. No one will have access to the data except for Alexandrea Ravenelle. a. Care of participants in case of an accident: Describe the provisi ons that have been made for the care of the participant in the event of an accident or complication related to the research procedures. (Note: This section may not apply to Category I or II research. Also , unless specific sponsored contracts exist to cover research-related injuries, the standard treat ment compensation language must be included in the consent form [see sample].) NA 4. Why are the risks and inconveniences mentioned above reasonable? W hat is the expected scientific yield from the project? Please justify the risks in relation to the anticipated benefits to the participants and in relation to the importance of the knowledge that may reasonably be expected to re sult from the research. MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 8 of 12 B. Risks and Benefits of the Research 1. Identify the risks (current and potential) and describe the expected frequency, degree of severity, and potential reversibility. Include any potential late effects. (Note: risks can be psychological , physical, social, economic, or legal.) The risks of this research are minimal. In the earlier research, workers often expres sed appreciation for the opportunity to talk about their gig economy work and often described the experience as enjoyable. 2. Does the research involve (check all that apply): administration of drugs, and chemical or biological agents administration of physical stimuli changes in diet or exercise use of private records (medical or educational records) possible invasion of privacy of participant or family deprivation of physiological requirements such as nutrition or sleep manipulation of psychological or social variables such as sensory deprivatio n, social isolation, psychological stresses the collection of personal or sensitive information in surveys or intervi ews use of a deceptive technique (If use of deception is part of the experimental protocol, the protocol must include a “debriefing procedure” [provide this procedure for IRB review] whi ch will be followed upon completion of the study, or withdrawal of the participants.) presentation of materials that participants might consider offensive, threatening, or degrading other risks: specify 3. Describe the precautions taken to minimize risk: I will protect participant confidentiality by coding responses and keeping pers onally identifiable information under lock and key, in a separate location. Participants will not be referred t o by name in the final research product and identifying characteristics will be changed or omitted to further pr otect your privacy. No one will have access to the data except for Alexandrea Ravenelle. a. Care of participants in case of an accident: Describe the provisi ons that have been made for the care of the participant in the event of an accident or complication related to the research procedures. (Note: This section may not apply to Category I or II research. Also , unless specific sponsored contracts exist to cover research-related injuries, the standard treat ment compensation language must be included in the consent form [see sample].) NA 4. Why are the risks and inconveniences mentioned above reasonable? W hat is the expected scientific yield from the project? Please justify the risks in relation to the anticipated benefits to the participants and in relation to the importance of the knowledge that may reasonably be expected to re sult from the research. MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 9 of 12 The risks associated with this study are minimal and this project does not invol ve any risks greater than those encountered in everyday life. The study involves analyzing data collec ted during interviews regarding one’s work experiences. All participants must consent to the study. Additi onally, all responses will be coded and the findings will be confidential. Only the primary investigator, Alexa ndrea Ravenelle, will know the identity of the participants (see section below for maintaining confidential ity), in addition, participants will have the ability to opt out of the study at any time without any reper cussions. 5. Benefits of participation: List any anticipated direct benefits of participation in this research project. If none, state that fact here and in the consent form. The knowledge gained from the study could produce a benefit to society. Payment is not considered to be a benefit of participation. Any benefits of treatment should be listed as potential benefits. The knowledge gained from the study could produce a benefit to society. Workers often find the experience of talking about their work to be enjoyable. C. Confidentiality of Data 1. Describe provisions made to maintain confidentiality of data. How will the data be coded? Who will have access to raw data? Will raw data be made available to anyone other than the Princ ipal Investigator and immediate study personnel (e.g., school officials, medical personnel)? If y es, who, how, and why? Describe the procedure for sharing data. Describe how the participant will be informed that the data may be shared. To protect the anonymity of the participants, all of the taped interviews, surveys and transcripts will be given a specific number. A list of the contacts for the st udy will be given corresponding numbers. The contact information will be kept in a place kn own only to the P.I. and be kept under password protection in an electronic location that is separate from the tapes, surveys and transcripts. The finished paper will use fictitious names and wil l change identifying characteristics of the participants. The coding mechanism will utilize letters associated with ea ch service provided (i.e. Taskrabbit could be indicated with A) and a number (A-001). 2. Where will the data be kept and for how long? How will audio and video tapes be disposed of? (Disposition of audio and video tapes should be included in consent form.) Recordings of interviews will be kept for three years. 3. Will the research data and information be part of the medical char t, academic record, or other permanent record? (Explain here and in the consent form.) Yes No NA MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 9 of 12 The risks associated with this study are minimal and this project does not invol ve any risks greater than those encountered in everyday life. The study involves analyzing data collec ted during interviews regarding one’s work experiences. All participants must consent to the study. Additi onally, all responses will be coded and the findings will be confidential. Only the primary investigator, Alexa ndrea Ravenelle, will know the identity of the participants (see section below for maintaining confidential ity), in addition, participants will have the ability to opt out of the study at any time without any reper cussions. 5. Benefits of participation: List any anticipated direct benefits of participation in this research project. If none, state that fact here and in the consent form. The knowledge gained from the study could produce a benefit to society. Payment is not considered to be a benefit of participation. Any benefits of treatment should be listed as potential benefits. The knowledge gained from the study could produce a benefit to society. Workers often find the experience of talking about their work to be enjoyable. C. Confidentiality of Data 1. Describe provisions made to maintain confidentiality of data. How will the data be coded? Who will have access to raw data? Will raw data be made available to anyone other than the Princ ipal Investigator and immediate study personnel (e.g., school officials, medical personnel)? If y es, who, how, and why? Describe the procedure for sharing data. Describe how the participant will be informed that the data may be shared. To protect the anonymity of the participants, all of the taped interviews, surveys and transcripts will be given a specific number. A list of the contacts for the st udy will be given corresponding numbers. The contact information will be kept in a place kn own only to the P.I. and be kept under password protection in an electronic location that is separate from the tapes, surveys and transcripts. The finished paper will use fictitious names and wil l change identifying characteristics of the participants. The coding mechanism will utilize letters associated with ea ch service provided (i.e. Taskrabbit could be indicated with A) and a number (A-001). 2. Where will the data be kept and for how long? How will audio and video tapes be disposed of? (Disposition of audio and video tapes should be included in consent form.) Recordings of interviews will be kept for three years. 3. Will the research data and information be part of the medical char t, academic record, or other permanent record? (Explain here and in the consent form.) Yes No NA MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 9 of 12 The risks associated with this study are minimal and this project does not invol ve any risks greater than those encountered in everyday life. The study involves analyzing data collec ted during interviews regarding one’s work experiences. All participants must consent to the study. Additi onally, all responses will be coded and the findings will be confidential. Only the primary investigator, Alexa ndrea Ravenelle, will know the identity of the participants (see section below for maintaining confidential ity), in addition, participants will have the ability to opt out of the study at any time without any reper cussions. 5. Benefits of participation: List any anticipated direct benefits of participation in this research project. If none, state that fact here and in the consent form. The knowledge gained from the study could produce a benefit to society. Payment is not considered to be a benefit of participation. Any benefits of treatment should be listed as potential benefits. The knowledge gained from the study could produce a benefit to society. Workers often find the experience of talking about their work to be enjoyable. C. Confidentiality of Data 1. Describe provisions made to maintain confidentiality of data. How will the data be coded? Who will have access to raw data? Will raw data be made available to anyone other than the Princ ipal Investigator and immediate study personnel (e.g., school officials, medical personnel)? If y es, who, how, and why? Describe the procedure for sharing data. Describe how the participant will be informed that the data may be shared. To protect the anonymity of the participants, all of the taped interviews, surveys and transcripts will be given a specific number. A list of the contacts for the st udy will be given corresponding numbers. The contact information will be kept in a place kn own only to the P.I. and be kept under password protection in an electronic location that is separate from the tapes, surveys and transcripts. The finished paper will use fictitious names and wil l change identifying characteristics of the participants. The coding mechanism will utilize letters associated with ea ch service provided (i.e. Taskrabbit could be indicated with A) and a number (A-001). 2. Where will the data be kept and for how long? How will audio and video tapes be disposed of? (Disposition of audio and video tapes should be included in consent form.) Recordings of interviews will be kept for three years. 3. Will the research data and information be part of the medical char t, academic record, or other permanent record? (Explain here and in the consent form.) Yes No NA MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 9 of 12 The risks associated with this study are minimal and this project does not invol ve any risks greater than those encountered in everyday life. The study involves analyzing data collec ted during interviews regarding one’s work experiences. All participants must consent to the study. Additi onally, all responses will be coded and the findings will be confidential. Only the primary investigator, Alexa ndrea Ravenelle, will know the identity of the participants (see section below for maintaining confidential ity), in addition, participants will have the ability to opt out of the study at any time without any reper cussions. 5. Benefits of participation: List any anticipated direct benefits of participation in this research project. If none, state that fact here and in the consent form. The knowledge gained from the study could produce a benefit to society. Payment is not considered to be a benefit of participation. Any benefits of treatment should be listed as potential benefits. The knowledge gained from the study could produce a benefit to society. Workers often find the experience of talking about their work to be enjoyable. C. Confidentiality of Data 1. Describe provisions made to maintain confidentiality of data. How will the data be coded? Who will have access to raw data? Will raw data be made available to anyone other than the Princ ipal Investigator and immediate study personnel (e.g., school officials, medical personnel)? If y es, who, how, and why? Describe the procedure for sharing data. Describe how the participant will be informed that the data may be shared. To protect the anonymity of the participants, all of the taped interviews, surveys and transcripts will be given a specific number. A list of the contacts for the st udy will be given corresponding numbers. The contact information will be kept in a place kn own only to the P.I. and be kept under password protection in an electronic location that is separate from the tapes, surveys and transcripts. The finished paper will use fictitious names and wil l change identifying characteristics of the participants. The coding mechanism will utilize letters associated with ea ch service provided (i.e. Taskrabbit could be indicated with A) and a number (A-001). 2. Where will the data be kept and for how long? How will audio and video tapes be disposed of? (Disposition of audio and video tapes should be included in consent form.) Recordings of interviews will be kept for three years. 3. Will the research data and information be part of the medical char t, academic record, or other permanent record? (Explain here and in the consent form.) Yes No NA MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 9 of 12 The risks associated with this study are minimal and this project does not invol ve any risks greater than those encountered in everyday life. The study involves analyzing data collec ted during interviews regarding one’s work experiences. All participants must consent to the study. Additi onally, all responses will be coded and the findings will be confidential. Only the primary investigator, Alexa ndrea Ravenelle, will know the identity of the participants (see section below for maintaining confidential ity), in addition, participants will have the ability to opt out of the study at any time without any reper cussions. 5. Benefits of participation: List any anticipated direct benefits of participation in this research project. If none, state that fact here and in the consent form. The knowledge gained from the study could produce a benefit to society. Payment is not considered to be a benefit of participation. Any benefits of treatment should be listed as potential benefits. The knowledge gained from the study could produce a benefit to society. Workers often find the experience of talking about their work to be enjoyable. C. Confidentiality of Data 1. Describe provisions made to maintain confidentiality of data. How will the data be coded? Who will have access to raw data? Will raw data be made available to anyone other than the Princ ipal Investigator and immediate study personnel (e.g., school officials, medical personnel)? If y es, who, how, and why? Describe the procedure for sharing data. Describe how the participant will be informed that the data may be shared. To protect the anonymity of the participants, all of the taped interviews, surveys and transcripts will be given a specific number. A list of the contacts for the st udy will be given corresponding numbers. The contact information will be kept in a place kn own only to the P.I. and be kept under password protection in an electronic location that is separate from the tapes, surveys and transcripts. The finished paper will use fictitious names and wil l change identifying characteristics of the participants. The coding mechanism will utilize letters associated with ea ch service provided (i.e. Taskrabbit could be indicated with A) and a number (A-001). 2. Where will the data be kept and for how long? How will audio and video tapes be disposed of? (Disposition of audio and video tapes should be included in consent form.) Recordings of interviews will be kept for three years. 3. Will the research data and information be part of the medical char t, academic record, or other permanent record? (Explain here and in the consent form.) Yes No NA MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 10 of 12 D. Informed Consent Process Simply giving a consent form to a participant does not cons titute informed consent. The following questions pertain to the process. Researchers are cautioned th at consent forms should be written in simple declarative sentences. The forms should be jargon- free. Foreign language versions should be prepared for any applicable research. 1. Capacity to consent. Will all adult participants have the capacity to give informed consent? Yes No If not, describe the likely range of impairment and explain how, and by whom, their capacity to consent will be determined. Note: In research involving more than minimal risk, capacity to consent should be determined by a psychiatrist, clinical psychologist, or other qualified profess ional not otherwise involved in the research. Individuals who lack the capacity to consent may participate in research onl y if a legally authorized representative gives consent on their behalf. NA a. Is the informed consent document attached? Yes No See MC IRB website for informed consent information: http://www.mercy.edu/stafffaculty/irb/sampleconsent.htm If you are using telephone surveys, telephone scripts are required. MERCY COLLEGE School of Social and Behavioral Sciences — Sociology Dept CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A RESEARCH STUDY Title of Research Study: Following-up on Life in the Gig/Sharing Economy Principal Investigator: Alexandrea J. Ravenelle, PhD [email protected] You are being asked to participate in a research stu dy because you work(ed) with one of the following sharing economy companies — Airbnb, Uber, or T askrabbit — and participated in a research project about your experiences in the sharing economy in 2015. Purpose : The purpose of this research study is to follow-up on your experience of working in the sharing economy in order to better understand what lif e is like in the sharing economy and why workers participate in the sharing economy. Procedures: If you agree to participate in this research study, I will ask you to do the following: Complete a short demographic survey o Survey questions will include your age, race, education level, number of children, number of hours you work each week, your occupat ion, political MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 10 of 12 D. Informed Consent Process Simply giving a consent form to a participant does not cons titute informed consent. The following questions pertain to the process. Researchers are cautioned th at consent forms should be written in simple declarative sentences. The forms should be jargon- free. Foreign language versions should be prepared for any applicable research. 1. Capacity to consent. Will all adult participants have the capacity to give informed consent? Yes No If not, describe the likely range of impairment and explain how, and by whom, their capacity to consent will be determined. Note: In research involving more than minimal risk, capacity to consent should be determined by a psychiatrist, clinical psychologist, or other qualified profess ional not otherwise involved in the research. Individuals who lack the capacity to consent may participate in research onl y if a legally authorized representative gives consent on their behalf. NA a. Is the informed consent document attached? Yes No See MC IRB website for informed consent information: http://www.mercy.edu/stafffaculty/irb/sampleconsent.htm If you are using telephone surveys, telephone scripts are required. MERCY COLLEGE School of Social and Behavioral Sciences — Sociology Dept CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A RESEARCH STUDY Title of Research Study: Following-up on Life in the Gig/Sharing Economy Principal Investigator: Alexandrea J. Ravenelle, PhD [email protected] You are being asked to participate in a research stu dy because you work(ed) with one of the following sharing economy companies — Airbnb, Uber, or T askrabbit — and participated in a research project about your experiences in the sharing economy in 2015. Purpose : The purpose of this research study is to follow-up on your experience of working in the sharing economy in order to better understand what lif e is like in the sharing economy and why workers participate in the sharing economy. Procedures: If you agree to participate in this research study, I will ask you to do the following: Complete a short demographic survey o Survey questions will include your age, race, education level, number of children, number of hours you work each week, your occupat ion, political MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 10 of 12 D. Informed Consent Process Simply giving a consent form to a participant does not cons titute informed consent. The following questions pertain to the process. Researchers are cautioned th at consent forms should be written in simple declarative sentences. The forms should be jargon- free. Foreign language versions should be prepared for any applicable research. 1. Capacity to consent. Will all adult participants have the capacity to give informed consent? Yes No If not, describe the likely range of impairment and explain how, and by whom, their capacity to consent will be determined. Note: In research involving more than minimal risk, capacity to consent should be determined by a psychiatrist, clinical psychologist, or other qualified profess ional not otherwise involved in the research. Individuals who lack the capacity to consent may participate in research onl y if a legally authorized representative gives consent on their behalf. NA a. Is the informed consent document attached? Yes No See MC IRB website for informed consent information: http://www.mercy.edu/stafffaculty/irb/sampleconsent.htm If you are using telephone surveys, telephone scripts are required. MERCY COLLEGE School of Social and Behavioral Sciences — Sociology Dept CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A RESEARCH STUDY Title of Research Study: Following-up on Life in the Gig/Sharing Economy Principal Investigator: Alexandrea J. Ravenelle, PhD [email protected] You are being asked to participate in a research stu dy because you work(ed) with one of the following sharing economy companies — Airbnb, Uber, or T askrabbit — and participated in a research project about your experiences in the sharing economy in 2015. Purpose : The purpose of this research study is to follow-up on your experience of working in the sharing economy in order to better understand what lif e is like in the sharing economy and why workers participate in the sharing economy. Procedures: If you agree to participate in this research study, I will ask you to do the following: Complete a short demographic survey o Survey questions will include your age, race, education level, number of children, number of hours you work each week, your occupat ion, political MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 10 of 12 D. Informed Consent Process Simply giving a consent form to a participant does not cons titute informed consent. The following questions pertain to the process. Researchers are cautioned th at consent forms should be written in simple declarative sentences. The forms should be jargon- free. Foreign language versions should be prepared for any applicable research. 1. Capacity to consent. Will all adult participants have the capacity to give informed consent? Yes No If not, describe the likely range of impairment and explain how, and by whom, their capacity to consent will be determined. Note: In research involving more than minimal risk, capacity to consent should be determined by a psychiatrist, clinical psychologist, or other qualified profess ional not otherwise involved in the research. Individuals who lack the capacity to consent may participate in research onl y if a legally authorized representative gives consent on their behalf. NA a. Is the informed consent document attached? Yes No See MC IRB website for informed consent information: http://www.mercy.edu/stafffaculty/irb/sampleconsent.htm If you are using telephone surveys, telephone scripts are required. MERCY COLLEGE School of Social and Behavioral Sciences — Sociology Dept CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A RESEARCH STUDY Title of Research Study: Following-up on Life in the Gig/Sharing Economy Principal Investigator: Alexandrea J. Ravenelle, PhD [email protected] You are being asked to participate in a research stu dy because you work(ed) with one of the following sharing economy companies — Airbnb, Uber, or T askrabbit — and participated in a research project about your experiences in the sharing economy in 2015. Purpose : The purpose of this research study is to follow-up on your experience of working in the sharing economy in order to better understand what lif e is like in the sharing economy and why workers participate in the sharing economy. Procedures: If you agree to participate in this research study, I will ask you to do the following: Complete a short demographic survey o Survey questions will include your age, race, education level, number of children, number of hours you work each week, your occupat ion, political MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 10 of 12 D. Informed Consent Process Simply giving a consent form to a participant does not cons titute informed consent. The following questions pertain to the process. Researchers are cautioned th at consent forms should be written in simple declarative sentences. The forms should be jargon- free. Foreign language versions should be prepared for any applicable research. 1. Capacity to consent. Will all adult participants have the capacity to give informed consent? Yes No If not, describe the likely range of impairment and explain how, and by whom, their capacity to consent will be determined. Note: In research involving more than minimal risk, capacity to consent should be determined by a psychiatrist, clinical psychologist, or other qualified profess ional not otherwise involved in the research. Individuals who lack the capacity to consent may participate in research onl y if a legally authorized representative gives consent on their behalf. NA a. Is the informed consent document attached? Yes No See MC IRB website for informed consent information: http://www.mercy.edu/stafffaculty/irb/sampleconsent.htm If you are using telephone surveys, telephone scripts are required. MERCY COLLEGE School of Social and Behavioral Sciences — Sociology Dept CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A RESEARCH STUDY Title of Research Study: Following-up on Life in the Gig/Sharing Economy Principal Investigator: Alexandrea J. Ravenelle, PhD [email protected] You are being asked to participate in a research stu dy because you work(ed) with one of the following sharing economy companies — Airbnb, Uber, or T askrabbit — and participated in a research project about your experiences in the sharing economy in 2015. Purpose : The purpose of this research study is to follow-up on your experience of working in the sharing economy in order to better understand what lif e is like in the sharing economy and why workers participate in the sharing economy. Procedures: If you agree to participate in this research study, I will ask you to do the following: Complete a short demographic survey o Survey questions will include your age, race, education level, number of children, number of hours you work each week, your occupat ion, political MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 11 of 12 leanings, etc. Participate in a one-on-one, in-person interview that will be tape-recorded and transcribed. Interview questions may include the following: o Are still working in the sharing/gig economy? Why or why not? o What are you doing now for income? o Have you changed services (i.e. moved from Uber to Lyft or TaskRabbit to Thumbtack)? Why or why not? o What is an average day like in your gig economy job(s)? o What do you enjoy about the sharing economy? Dislike? o Do you think of yourself as a small business owner? o Many of the sharing economy companies talk about how the sharing economy is building up community and connection. Can you talk about what that means to you? o The gig economy is constantly changing. How have those ch anges affected you? Time Commitment: Your participation in this research study is expected to last for no more than 2 hours. Potential Risks or Discomforts : Some of the questions the researcher asks you may be u psetting, or you may feel uncomfortable answering them. If you do not wish to answe r a question, you can skip it and go to the next question. Potential Benefits : You will not directly benefit from your participation in this research study, however, many participants report that having the opportunity t o discuss their experiences is cathartic and enjoyable. It is expected that this research will strengthen our u nderstanding of the sharing economy, workers’ reasons for participating, and the st rengths and weaknesses of this model. Payment for Participation : You will receive a $25 cash payment and lunch in exchange for your time and participation. Confidentiality: I will make our best efforts to maintain confidentiality of any information that is collected during this research study, and that can identify you. I will disclose this information only with your permission or as required by law. I will protect your confidentiality by coding your respons es and keeping your personally identifiable information under lock and key, in a separat e location. You will not be referred to by name in the final research product and identifying characteristics will be changed or omitted to further protect your privacy. No one will have a ccess to your data except for Alexandrea Ravenelle. You have the right to contact the primary investigator and to review the recordings taken as MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 11 of 12 leanings, etc. Participate in a one-on-one, in-person interview that will be tape-recorded and transcribed. Interview questions may include the following: o Are still working in the sharing/gig economy? Why or why not? o What are you doing now for income? o Have you changed services (i.e. moved from Uber to Lyft or TaskRabbit to Thumbtack)? Why or why not? o What is an average day like in your gig economy job(s)? o What do you enjoy about the sharing economy? Dislike? o Do you think of yourself as a small business owner? o Many of the sharing economy companies talk about how the sharing economy is building up community and connection. Can you talk about what that means to you? o The gig economy is constantly changing. How have those ch anges affected you? Time Commitment: Your participation in this research study is expected to last for no more than 2 hours. Potential Risks or Discomforts : Some of the questions the researcher asks you may be u psetting, or you may feel uncomfortable answering them. If you do not wish to answe r a question, you can skip it and go to the next question. Potential Benefits : You will not directly benefit from your participation in this research study, however, many participants report that having the opportunity t o discuss their experiences is cathartic and enjoyable. It is expected that this research will strengthen our u nderstanding of the sharing economy, workers’ reasons for participating, and the st rengths and weaknesses of this model. Payment for Participation : You will receive a $25 cash payment and lunch in exchange for your time and participation. Confidentiality: I will make our best efforts to maintain confidentiality of any information that is collected during this research study, and that can identify you. I will disclose this information only with your permission or as required by law. I will protect your confidentiality by coding your respons es and keeping your personally identifiable information under lock and key, in a separat e location. You will not be referred to by name in the final research product and identifying characteristics will be changed or omitted to further protect your privacy. No one will have a ccess to your data except for Alexandrea Ravenelle. You have the right to contact the primary investigator and to review the recordings taken as MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 11 of 12 leanings, etc. Participate in a one-on-one, in-person interview that will be tape-recorded and transcribed. Interview questions may include the following: o Are still working in the sharing/gig economy? Why or why not? o What are you doing now for income? o Have you changed services (i.e. moved from Uber to Lyft or TaskRabbit to Thumbtack)? Why or why not? o What is an average day like in your gig economy job(s)? o What do you enjoy about the sharing economy? Dislike? o Do you think of yourself as a small business owner? o Many of the sharing economy companies talk about how the sharing economy is building up community and connection. Can you talk about what that means to you? o The gig economy is constantly changing. How have those ch anges affected you? Time Commitment: Your participation in this research study is expected to last for no more than 2 hours. Potential Risks or Discomforts : Some of the questions the researcher asks you may be u psetting, or you may feel uncomfortable answering them. If you do not wish to answe r a question, you can skip it and go to the next question. Potential Benefits : You will not directly benefit from your participation in this research study, however, many participants report that having the opportunity t o discuss their experiences is cathartic and enjoyable. It is expected that this research will strengthen our u nderstanding of the sharing economy, workers’ reasons for participating, and the st rengths and weaknesses of this model. Payment for Participation : You will receive a $25 cash payment and lunch in exchange for your time and participation. Confidentiality: I will make our best efforts to maintain confidentiality of any information that is collected during this research study, and that can identify you. I will disclose this information only with your permission or as required by law. I will protect your confidentiality by coding your respons es and keeping your personally identifiable information under lock and key, in a separat e location. You will not be referred to by name in the final research product and identifying characteristics will be changed or omitted to further protect your privacy. No one will have a ccess to your data except for Alexandrea Ravenelle. You have the right to contact the primary investigator and to review the recordings taken as MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 11 of 12 leanings, etc. Participate in a one-on-one, in-person interview that will be tape-recorded and transcribed. Interview questions may include the following: o Are still working in the sharing/gig economy? Why or why not? o What are you doing now for income? o Have you changed services (i.e. moved from Uber to Lyft or TaskRabbit to Thumbtack)? Why or why not? o What is an average day like in your gig economy job(s)? o What do you enjoy about the sharing economy? Dislike? o Do you think of yourself as a small business owner? o Many of the sharing economy companies talk about how the sharing economy is building up community and connection. Can you talk about what that means to you? o The gig economy is constantly changing. How have those ch anges affected you? Time Commitment: Your participation in this research study is expected to last for no more than 2 hours. Potential Risks or Discomforts : Some of the questions the researcher asks you may be u psetting, or you may feel uncomfortable answering them. If you do not wish to answe r a question, you can skip it and go to the next question. Potential Benefits : You will not directly benefit from your participation in this research study, however, many participants report that having the opportunity t o discuss their experiences is cathartic and enjoyable. It is expected that this research will strengthen our u nderstanding of the sharing economy, workers’ reasons for participating, and the st rengths and weaknesses of this model. Payment for Participation : You will receive a $25 cash payment and lunch in exchange for your time and participation. Confidentiality: I will make our best efforts to maintain confidentiality of any information that is collected during this research study, and that can identify you. I will disclose this information only with your permission or as required by law. I will protect your confidentiality by coding your respons es and keeping your personally identifiable information under lock and key, in a separat e location. You will not be referred to by name in the final research product and identifying characteristics will be changed or omitted to further protect your privacy. No one will have a ccess to your data except for Alexandrea Ravenelle. You have the right to contact the primary investigator and to review the recordings taken as MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 11 of 12 leanings, etc. Participate in a one-on-one, in-person interview that will be tape-recorded and transcribed. Interview questions may include the following: o Are still working in the sharing/gig economy? Why or why not? o What are you doing now for income? o Have you changed services (i.e. moved from Uber to Lyft or TaskRabbit to Thumbtack)? Why or why not? o What is an average day like in your gig economy job(s)? o What do you enjoy about the sharing economy? Dislike? o Do you think of yourself as a small business owner? o Many of the sharing economy companies talk about how the sharing economy is building up community and connection. Can you talk about what that means to you? o The gig economy is constantly changing. How have those ch anges affected you? Time Commitment: Your participation in this research study is expected to last for no more than 2 hours. Potential Risks or Discomforts : Some of the questions the researcher asks you may be u psetting, or you may feel uncomfortable answering them. If you do not wish to answe r a question, you can skip it and go to the next question. Potential Benefits : You will not directly benefit from your participation in this research study, however, many participants report that having the opportunity t o discuss their experiences is cathartic and enjoyable. It is expected that this research will strengthen our u nderstanding of the sharing economy, workers’ reasons for participating, and the st rengths and weaknesses of this model. Payment for Participation : You will receive a $25 cash payment and lunch in exchange for your time and participation. Confidentiality: I will make our best efforts to maintain confidentiality of any information that is collected during this research study, and that can identify you. I will disclose this information only with your permission or as required by law. I will protect your confidentiality by coding your respons es and keeping your personally identifiable information under lock and key, in a separat e location. You will not be referred to by name in the final research product and identifying characteristics will be changed or omitted to further protect your privacy. No one will have a ccess to your data except for Alexandrea Ravenelle. You have the right to contact the primary investigator and to review the recordings taken as MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 12 of 12 part of this research to determine whether they shoul d be edited or erased in whole or in part. The research team, authorized Mercy staff, and governme nt agencies that oversee this type of research may have access to research data and records in order to monitor the research. Research records provided to authorized, non-Mercy ind ividuals will not contain identifiable information about you. Publications and/or presentatio ns that result from this study will not identify you by name. The recording of your interview will be kept for three year s and then destroyed. Participants’ Rights : Your participation in this research study is entirely voluntary. If you decide not to participate, there will be no penalty to you, and you will not lose any benefits to which you are otherwise entitled. You can decide to withdraw your consent and stop parti cipating in the research at any time, without any penalty. You may refuse to answer any questions that you do not want to answer and still remain in the study. Questions, Comments or Concerns : If you have any questions, comments or concerns about t he research, you can talk to the following researcher: Alexandrea Ravenelle, PhD; [email protected], 914-674-7341 The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Mercy College ha s approved recruitment of participants for this research study. Professor Bri an Baker, the IRB chairperson, can be contacted to answer questions about the rights of re search participants at 718-678-8812 or [email protected] . The principal investigator can be contacted at 914- 674-7341within the semester for information regarding the outcome of t he study. Please keep this for your records. Sincerely, Alexandrea Ravenelle, PhD ___________________________________________________ __ Printed Name of Participant ___________________________________________________ __ __________________________ Signature of Participant Date Signature of Individual Obtaining Consent MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 12 of 12 part of this research to determine whether they shoul d be edited or erased in whole or in part. The research team, authorized Mercy staff, and governme nt agencies that oversee this type of research may have access to research data and records in order to monitor the research. Research records provided to authorized, non-Mercy ind ividuals will not contain identifiable information about you. Publications and/or presentatio ns that result from this study will not identify you by name. The recording of your interview will be kept for three year s and then destroyed. Participants’ Rights : Your participation in this research study is entirely voluntary. If you decide not to participate, there will be no penalty to you, and you will not lose any benefits to which you are otherwise entitled. You can decide to withdraw your consent and stop parti cipating in the research at any time, without any penalty. You may refuse to answer any questions that you do not want to answer and still remain in the study. Questions, Comments or Concerns : If you have any questions, comments or concerns about t he research, you can talk to the following researcher: Alexandrea Ravenelle, PhD; [email protected], 914-674-7341 The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Mercy College ha s approved recruitment of participants for this research study. Professor Bri an Baker, the IRB chairperson, can be contacted to answer questions about the rights of re search participants at 718-678-8812 or [email protected] . The principal investigator can be contacted at 914- 674-7341within the semester for information regarding the outcome of t he study. Please keep this for your records. Sincerely, Alexandrea Ravenelle, PhD ___________________________________________________ __ Printed Name of Participant ___________________________________________________ __ __________________________ Signature of Participant Date Signature of Individual Obtaining Consent MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 12 of 12 part of this research to determine whether they shoul d be edited or erased in whole or in part. The research team, authorized Mercy staff, and governme nt agencies that oversee this type of research may have access to research data and records in order to monitor the research. Research records provided to authorized, non-Mercy ind ividuals will not contain identifiable information about you. Publications and/or presentatio ns that result from this study will not identify you by name. The recording of your interview will be kept for three year s and then destroyed. Participants’ Rights : Your participation in this research study is entirely voluntary. If you decide not to participate, there will be no penalty to you, and you will not lose any benefits to which you are otherwise entitled. You can decide to withdraw your consent and stop parti cipating in the research at any time, without any penalty. You may refuse to answer any questions that you do not want to answer and still remain in the study. Questions, Comments or Concerns : If you have any questions, comments or concerns about t he research, you can talk to the following researcher: Alexandrea Ravenelle, PhD; [email protected], 914-674-7341 The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Mercy College ha s approved recruitment of participants for this research study. Professor Bri an Baker, the IRB chairperson, can be contacted to answer questions about the rights of re search participants at 718-678-8812 or [email protected] . The principal investigator can be contacted at 914- 674-7341within the semester for information regarding the outcome of t he study. Please keep this for your records. Sincerely, Alexandrea Ravenelle, PhD ___________________________________________________ __ Printed Name of Participant ___________________________________________________ __ __________________________ Signature of Participant Date Signature of Individual Obtaining Consent MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 12 of 12 part of this research to determine whether they shoul d be edited or erased in whole or in part. The research team, authorized Mercy staff, and governme nt agencies that oversee this type of research may have access to research data and records in order to monitor the research. Research records provided to authorized, non-Mercy ind ividuals will not contain identifiable information about you. Publications and/or presentatio ns that result from this study will not identify you by name. The recording of your interview will be kept for three year s and then destroyed. Participants’ Rights : Your participation in this research study is entirely voluntary. If you decide not to participate, there will be no penalty to you, and you will not lose any benefits to which you are otherwise entitled. You can decide to withdraw your consent and stop parti cipating in the research at any time, without any penalty. You may refuse to answer any questions that you do not want to answer and still remain in the study. Questions, Comments or Concerns : If you have any questions, comments or concerns about t he research, you can talk to the following researcher: Alexandrea Ravenelle, PhD; [email protected], 914-674-7341 The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Mercy College ha s approved recruitment of participants for this research study. Professor Bri an Baker, the IRB chairperson, can be contacted to answer questions about the rights of re search participants at 718-678-8812 or [email protected] . The principal investigator can be contacted at 914- 674-7341within the semester for information regarding the outcome of t he study. Please keep this for your records. Sincerely, Alexandrea Ravenelle, PhD ___________________________________________________ __ Printed Name of Participant ___________________________________________________ __ __________________________ Signature of Participant Date Signature of Individual Obtaining Consent MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 12 of 12 part of this research to determine whether they shoul d be edited or erased in whole or in part. The research team, authorized Mercy staff, and governme nt agencies that oversee this type of research may have access to research data and records in order to monitor the research. Research records provided to authorized, non-Mercy ind ividuals will not contain identifiable information about you. Publications and/or presentatio ns that result from this study will not identify you by name. The recording of your interview will be kept for three year s and then destroyed. Participants’ Rights : Your participation in this research study is entirely voluntary. If you decide not to participate, there will be no penalty to you, and you will not lose any benefits to which you are otherwise entitled. You can decide to withdraw your consent and stop parti cipating in the research at any time, without any penalty. You may refuse to answer any questions that you do not want to answer and still remain in the study. Questions, Comments or Concerns : If you have any questions, comments or concerns about t he research, you can talk to the following researcher: Alexandrea Ravenelle, PhD; [email protected], 914-674-7341 The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Mercy College ha s approved recruitment of participants for this research study. Professor Bri an Baker, the IRB chairperson, can be contacted to answer questions about the rights of re search participants at 718-678-8812 or [email protected] . The principal investigator can be contacted at 914- 674-7341within the semester for information regarding the outcome of t he study. Please keep this for your records. Sincerely, Alexandrea Ravenelle, PhD ___________________________________________________ __ Printed Name of Participant ___________________________________________________ __ __________________________ Signature of Participant Date Signature of Individual Obtaining Consent MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 13 of 12 __Alexandrea Ravenelle__________________________ Printed Name of Individual Obtaining Consent _____________________________________________________ _________________ _________ Signature of Individual Obtaining Consent Date 2. How will participants’ understanding be assessed? What questions will be asked to assess the participants’ understanding; will there be written responses; will understanding be assessed at other points in time? (Note: the purpose of this question is to ask you to describe how you w ill assess participants’ understanding of the consent process. Questions requiring “yes/ no” answers do not do that very well. Please ask participants to explain the purpose of the study to you along with the risks and benefits to themselves as participants. Their answers to these questions should allow you to determine if they understand the study and their part in it. If they do not understand, informed consent has not been achieved even if the participant signed the consent document.) I will ask participants to explain the purpose of the study in their own w ords, along with their potential risks and benefits, in order to confirm that they understand the study and have given infor med consent. 3. In relation to the actual data gathering, when and where will co nsent be discussed and documentation obtained, for example, immediately prior to the data collection o r several days before? Be specific. Informed consent will be secured immediately before participants complete the demographic survey and interview. 4. Will the investigator(s) be securing all of the informed consen ts? Yes No If no, name the specific individuals who will obtain informed consent and include t heir job title and a brief description of your plans to train these individuals to obtain consent and answ er participants’ questions. NA 5. Are you requesting Waiver or Alteration of Informed Consen t? Yes No An IRB may approve a consent which does not include, or alters, so me or all of the elements of informed consent (e.g., oral consent). Provide justifications for the following questions for requesting a waiver of written informed consent. a. Why does the proposed research present no more than minimal risk to the participants? NA MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 13 of 12 __Alexandrea Ravenelle__________________________ Printed Name of Individual Obtaining Consent _____________________________________________________ _________________ _________ Signature of Individual Obtaining Consent Date 2. How will participants’ understanding be assessed? What questions will be asked to assess the participants’ understanding; will there be written responses; will understanding be assessed at other points in time? (Note: the purpose of this question is to ask you to describe how you w ill assess participants’ understanding of the consent process. Questions requiring “yes/ no” answers do not do that very well. Please ask participants to explain the purpose of the study to you along with the risks and benefits to themselves as participants. Their answers to these questions should allow you to determine if they understand the study and their part in it. If they do not understand, informed consent has not been achieved even if the participant signed the consent document.) I will ask participants to explain the purpose of the study in their own w ords, along with their potential risks and benefits, in order to confirm that they understand the study and have given infor med consent. 3. In relation to the actual data gathering, when and where will co nsent be discussed and documentation obtained, for example, immediately prior to the data collection o r several days before? Be specific. Informed consent will be secured immediately before participants complete the demographic survey and interview. 4. Will the investigator(s) be securing all of the informed consen ts? Yes No If no, name the specific individuals who will obtain informed consent and include t heir job title and a brief description of your plans to train these individuals to obtain consent and answ er participants’ questions. NA 5. Are you requesting Waiver or Alteration of Informed Consen t? Yes No An IRB may approve a consent which does not include, or alters, so me or all of the elements of informed consent (e.g., oral consent). Provide justifications for the following questions for requesting a waiver of written informed consent. a. Why does the proposed research present no more than minimal risk to the participants? NA MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 13 of 12 __Alexandrea Ravenelle__________________________ Printed Name of Individual Obtaining Consent _____________________________________________________ _________________ _________ Signature of Individual Obtaining Consent Date 2. How will participants’ understanding be assessed? What questions will be asked to assess the participants’ understanding; will there be written responses; will understanding be assessed at other points in time? (Note: the purpose of this question is to ask you to describe how you w ill assess participants’ understanding of the consent process. Questions requiring “yes/ no” answers do not do that very well. Please ask participants to explain the purpose of the study to you along with the risks and benefits to themselves as participants. Their answers to these questions should allow you to determine if they understand the study and their part in it. If they do not understand, informed consent has not been achieved even if the participant signed the consent document.) I will ask participants to explain the purpose of the study in their own w ords, along with their potential risks and benefits, in order to confirm that they understand the study and have given infor med consent. 3. In relation to the actual data gathering, when and where will co nsent be discussed and documentation obtained, for example, immediately prior to the data collection o r several days before? Be specific. Informed consent will be secured immediately before participants complete the demographic survey and interview. 4. Will the investigator(s) be securing all of the informed consen ts? Yes No If no, name the specific individuals who will obtain informed consent and include t heir job title and a brief description of your plans to train these individuals to obtain consent and answ er participants’ questions. NA 5. Are you requesting Waiver or Alteration of Informed Consen t? Yes No An IRB may approve a consent which does not include, or alters, so me or all of the elements of informed consent (e.g., oral consent). Provide justifications for the following questions for requesting a waiver of written informed consent. a. Why does the proposed research present no more than minimal risk to the participants? NA MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 13 of 12 __Alexandrea Ravenelle__________________________ Printed Name of Individual Obtaining Consent _____________________________________________________ _________________ _________ Signature of Individual Obtaining Consent Date 2. How will participants’ understanding be assessed? What questions will be asked to assess the participants’ understanding; will there be written responses; will understanding be assessed at other points in time? (Note: the purpose of this question is to ask you to describe how you w ill assess participants’ understanding of the consent process. Questions requiring “yes/ no” answers do not do that very well. Please ask participants to explain the purpose of the study to you along with the risks and benefits to themselves as participants. Their answers to these questions should allow you to determine if they understand the study and their part in it. If they do not understand, informed consent has not been achieved even if the participant signed the consent document.) I will ask participants to explain the purpose of the study in their own w ords, along with their potential risks and benefits, in order to confirm that they understand the study and have given infor med consent. 3. In relation to the actual data gathering, when and where will co nsent be discussed and documentation obtained, for example, immediately prior to the data collection o r several days before? Be specific. Informed consent will be secured immediately before participants complete the demographic survey and interview. 4. Will the investigator(s) be securing all of the informed consen ts? Yes No If no, name the specific individuals who will obtain informed consent and include t heir job title and a brief description of your plans to train these individuals to obtain consent and answ er participants’ questions. NA 5. Are you requesting Waiver or Alteration of Informed Consen t? Yes No An IRB may approve a consent which does not include, or alters, so me or all of the elements of informed consent (e.g., oral consent). Provide justifications for the following questions for requesting a waiver of written informed consent. a. Why does the proposed research present no more than minimal risk to the participants? NA MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 13 of 12 __Alexandrea Ravenelle__________________________ Printed Name of Individual Obtaining Consent _____________________________________________________ _________________ _________ Signature of Individual Obtaining Consent Date 2. How will participants’ understanding be assessed? What questions will be asked to assess the participants’ understanding; will there be written responses; will understanding be assessed at other points in time? (Note: the purpose of this question is to ask you to describe how you w ill assess participants’ understanding of the consent process. Questions requiring “yes/ no” answers do not do that very well. Please ask participants to explain the purpose of the study to you along with the risks and benefits to themselves as participants. Their answers to these questions should allow you to determine if they understand the study and their part in it. If they do not understand, informed consent has not been achieved even if the participant signed the consent document.) I will ask participants to explain the purpose of the study in their own w ords, along with their potential risks and benefits, in order to confirm that they understand the study and have given infor med consent. 3. In relation to the actual data gathering, when and where will co nsent be discussed and documentation obtained, for example, immediately prior to the data collection o r several days before? Be specific. Informed consent will be secured immediately before participants complete the demographic survey and interview. 4. Will the investigator(s) be securing all of the informed consen ts? Yes No If no, name the specific individuals who will obtain informed consent and include t heir job title and a brief description of your plans to train these individuals to obtain consent and answ er participants’ questions. NA 5. Are you requesting Waiver or Alteration of Informed Consen t? Yes No An IRB may approve a consent which does not include, or alters, so me or all of the elements of informed consent (e.g., oral consent). Provide justifications for the following questions for requesting a waiver of written informed consent. a. Why does the proposed research present no more than minimal risk to the participants? NA MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 14 of 12 b. Why will a waiver of informed consent not adversely affect th e rights and welfare of participants? NA c. Why is it impracticable to carry out the research without a waiv er or alteration of informed consent? NA d. How will pertinent information be provided to the partici pants, if appropriate, at a later date? NA Even if waiver of written informed consent is granted, you may be required to obtain verbal permission which reflects elements of the written consent (if appropriate). Please specify below the information to be read/given to the research participants. NA E. Investigator Training MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 14 of 12 b. Why will a waiver of informed consent not adversely affect th e rights and welfare of participants? NA c. Why is it impracticable to carry out the research without a waiv er or alteration of informed consent? NA d. How will pertinent information be provided to the partici pants, if appropriate, at a later date? NA Even if waiver of written informed consent is granted, you may be required to obtain verbal permission which reflects elements of the written consent (if appropriate). Please specify below the information to be read/given to the research participants. NA E. Investigator Training MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 14 of 12 b. Why will a waiver of informed consent not adversely affect th e rights and welfare of participants? NA c. Why is it impracticable to carry out the research without a waiv er or alteration of informed consent? NA d. How will pertinent information be provided to the partici pants, if appropriate, at a later date? NA Even if waiver of written informed consent is granted, you may be required to obtain verbal permission which reflects elements of the written consent (if appropriate). Please specify below the information to be read/given to the research participants. NA E. Investigator Training MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 14 of 12 b. Why will a waiver of informed consent not adversely affect th e rights and welfare of participants? NA c. Why is it impracticable to carry out the research without a waiv er or alteration of informed consent? NA d. How will pertinent information be provided to the partici pants, if appropriate, at a later date? NA Even if waiver of written informed consent is granted, you may be required to obtain verbal permission which reflects elements of the written consent (if appropriate). Please specify below the information to be read/given to the research participants. NA E. Investigator Training MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 14 of 12 b. Why will a waiver of informed consent not adversely affect th e rights and welfare of participants? NA c. Why is it impracticable to carry out the research without a waiv er or alteration of informed consent? NA d. How will pertinent information be provided to the partici pants, if appropriate, at a later date? NA Even if waiver of written informed consent is granted, you may be required to obtain verbal permission which reflects elements of the written consent (if appropriate). Please specify below the information to be read/given to the research participants. NA E. Investigator Training MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 15 of 12 1. Describe the investigator(s) training and experience to conduct t he research (e.g., training and experience). Include a copy of certificate demonstrating completion of the NIH Computer Based Training Program (required for all key personnel in the research project). I have a PhD and an M.Phil in Sociology from the CUNY Gradu ate Center and an MA in Sociology from the University of Missouri. This will be my eighth major research project. My previous research includes two qualitative research projects examining the ideology o f religiously conservative women, a study looking at undergraduate transfer of writing skills across th eir academic careers and, of course, my dissertation on the lived experience of gig economy workers. Ad ditionally, I have a small research consultancy and have conducted mixed methods and qualitativ e research for the American Liver Foundation and the National Epilepsy Foundation In addition to my academic training, I have also completed the CITI training at the CUNY Graduate Center and at Mercy College. A copy of my certificates are avai lable online here: Social & Behavioral Research: www.citiprogram.org/verify/?w35f8e973-3543-4e39-a15 c- c1a307db4116-27724649 Social and Behavioral responsible Code of Research: www.citiprogram.org/verify/?wa02e2b37-fb9f-4549-97f d-ff9437df90e4-27724651 Human Subjects Research: www.citiprogram.org/verify/?k1b43cffe-12b8-4cd7-b43 f- 3ddc4e059bfe-25128547 INVESTIGATOR’S ASSURANCE I certify that the information provided in this application is complete and correct. I understand that as Principal Investigator, I have ultimate responsibilit y for the protection of the rights and welfare of human participants, conduct of the study and the ethical performance of the project . I agree to comply with all Mercy College policies and procedures, as well as with all applicable federal, state and local laws regarding the protection of human participants in research, includ ing, but not limited to, the following: The project will be performed by qualified personnel according to the MC I RB certified protocol, No changes will be made in the protocol or consent form until approved by the MC IRB, Legally effective informed consent will be obtained from human participants if applicable, and Adverse events will be reported to the MC IRB in a timely manner. I have completed the required educational program on ethical principles and regulatory r equirements. I further certify that the proposed research is not currently underway and will not begin until approval has been obtained. ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______July 5, 2018 ________ Alexandrea Ravenelle, PhD, Principal Investigator Date FACULTY SPONSOR’S ASSURANCE MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 15 of 12 1. Describe the investigator(s) training and experience to conduct t he research (e.g., training and experience). Include a copy of certificate demonstrating completion of the NIH Computer Based Training Program (required for all key personnel in the research project). I have a PhD and an M.Phil in Sociology from the CUNY Gradu ate Center and an MA in Sociology from the University of Missouri. This will be my eighth major research project. My previous research includes two qualitative research projects examining the ideology o f religiously conservative women, a study looking at undergraduate transfer of writing skills across th eir academic careers and, of course, my dissertation on the lived experience of gig economy workers. Ad ditionally, I have a small research consultancy and have conducted mixed methods and qualitativ e research for the American Liver Foundation and the National Epilepsy Foundation In addition to my academic training, I have also completed the CITI training at the CUNY Graduate Center and at Mercy College. A copy of my certificates are avai lable online here: Social & Behavioral Research: www.citiprogram.org/verify/?w35f8e973-3543-4e39-a15 c- c1a307db4116-27724649 Social and Behavioral responsible Code of Research: www.citiprogram.org/verify/?wa02e2b37-fb9f-4549-97f d-ff9437df90e4-27724651 Human Subjects Research: www.citiprogram.org/verify/?k1b43cffe-12b8-4cd7-b43 f- 3ddc4e059bfe-25128547 INVESTIGATOR’S ASSURANCE I certify that the information provided in this application is complete and correct. I understand that as Principal Investigator, I have ultimate responsibilit y for the protection of the rights and welfare of human participants, conduct of the study and the ethical performance of the project . I agree to comply with all Mercy College policies and procedures, as well as with all applicable federal, state and local laws regarding the protection of human participants in research, includ ing, but not limited to, the following: The project will be performed by qualified personnel according to the MC I RB certified protocol, No changes will be made in the protocol or consent form until approved by the MC IRB, Legally effective informed consent will be obtained from human participants if applicable, and Adverse events will be reported to the MC IRB in a timely manner. I have completed the required educational program on ethical principles and regulatory r equirements. I further certify that the proposed research is not currently underway and will not begin until approval has been obtained. ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______July 5, 2018 ________ Alexandrea Ravenelle, PhD, Principal Investigator Date FACULTY SPONSOR’S ASSURANCE MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 15 of 12 1. Describe the investigator(s) training and experience to conduct t he research (e.g., training and experience). Include a copy of certificate demonstrating completion of the NIH Computer Based Training Program (required for all key personnel in the research project). I have a PhD and an M.Phil in Sociology from the CUNY Gradu ate Center and an MA in Sociology from the University of Missouri. This will be my eighth major research project. My previous research includes two qualitative research projects examining the ideology o f religiously conservative women, a study looking at undergraduate transfer of writing skills across th eir academic careers and, of course, my dissertation on the lived experience of gig economy workers. Ad ditionally, I have a small research consultancy and have conducted mixed methods and qualitativ e research for the American Liver Foundation and the National Epilepsy Foundation In addition to my academic training, I have also completed the CITI training at the CUNY Graduate Center and at Mercy College. A copy of my certificates are avai lable online here: Social & Behavioral Research: www.citiprogram.org/verify/?w35f8e973-3543-4e39-a15 c- c1a307db4116-27724649 Social and Behavioral responsible Code of Research: www.citiprogram.org/verify/?wa02e2b37-fb9f-4549-97f d-ff9437df90e4-27724651 Human Subjects Research: www.citiprogram.org/verify/?k1b43cffe-12b8-4cd7-b43 f- 3ddc4e059bfe-25128547 INVESTIGATOR’S ASSURANCE I certify that the information provided in this application is complete and correct. I understand that as Principal Investigator, I have ultimate responsibilit y for the protection of the rights and welfare of human participants, conduct of the study and the ethical performance of the project . I agree to comply with all Mercy College policies and procedures, as well as with all applicable federal, state and local laws regarding the protection of human participants in research, includ ing, but not limited to, the following: The project will be performed by qualified personnel according to the MC I RB certified protocol, No changes will be made in the protocol or consent form until approved by the MC IRB, Legally effective informed consent will be obtained from human participants if applicable, and Adverse events will be reported to the MC IRB in a timely manner. I have completed the required educational program on ethical principles and regulatory r equirements. I further certify that the proposed research is not currently underway and will not begin until approval has been obtained. ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______July 5, 2018 ________ Alexandrea Ravenelle, PhD, Principal Investigator Date FACULTY SPONSOR’S ASSURANCE MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 15 of 12 1. Describe the investigator(s) training and experience to conduct t he research (e.g., training and experience). Include a copy of certificate demonstrating completion of the NIH Computer Based Training Program (required for all key personnel in the research project). I have a PhD and an M.Phil in Sociology from the CUNY Gradu ate Center and an MA in Sociology from the University of Missouri. This will be my eighth major research project. My previous research includes two qualitative research projects examining the ideology o f religiously conservative women, a study looking at undergraduate transfer of writing skills across th eir academic careers and, of course, my dissertation on the lived experience of gig economy workers. Ad ditionally, I have a small research consultancy and have conducted mixed methods and qualitativ e research for the American Liver Foundation and the National Epilepsy Foundation In addition to my academic training, I have also completed the CITI training at the CUNY Graduate Center and at Mercy College. A copy of my certificates are avai lable online here: Social & Behavioral Research: www.citiprogram.org/verify/?w35f8e973-3543-4e39-a15 c- c1a307db4116-27724649 Social and Behavioral responsible Code of Research: www.citiprogram.org/verify/?wa02e2b37-fb9f-4549-97f d-ff9437df90e4-27724651 Human Subjects Research: www.citiprogram.org/verify/?k1b43cffe-12b8-4cd7-b43 f- 3ddc4e059bfe-25128547 INVESTIGATOR’S ASSURANCE I certify that the information provided in this application is complete and correct. I understand that as Principal Investigator, I have ultimate responsibilit y for the protection of the rights and welfare of human participants, conduct of the study and the ethical performance of the project . I agree to comply with all Mercy College policies and procedures, as well as with all applicable federal, state and local laws regarding the protection of human participants in research, includ ing, but not limited to, the following: The project will be performed by qualified personnel according to the MC I RB certified protocol, No changes will be made in the protocol or consent form until approved by the MC IRB, Legally effective informed consent will be obtained from human participants if applicable, and Adverse events will be reported to the MC IRB in a timely manner. I have completed the required educational program on ethical principles and regulatory r equirements. I further certify that the proposed research is not currently underway and will not begin until approval has been obtained. ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______July 5, 2018 ________ Alexandrea Ravenelle, PhD, Principal Investigator Date FACULTY SPONSOR’S ASSURANCE MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 15 of 12 1. Describe the investigator(s) training and experience to conduct t he research (e.g., training and experience). Include a copy of certificate demonstrating completion of the NIH Computer Based Training Program (required for all key personnel in the research project). I have a PhD and an M.Phil in Sociology from the CUNY Gradu ate Center and an MA in Sociology from the University of Missouri. This will be my eighth major research project. My previous research includes two qualitative research projects examining the ideology o f religiously conservative women, a study looking at undergraduate transfer of writing skills across th eir academic careers and, of course, my dissertation on the lived experience of gig economy workers. Ad ditionally, I have a small research consultancy and have conducted mixed methods and qualitativ e research for the American Liver Foundation and the National Epilepsy Foundation In addition to my academic training, I have also completed the CITI training at the CUNY Graduate Center and at Mercy College. A copy of my certificates are avai lable online here: Social & Behavioral Research: www.citiprogram.org/verify/?w35f8e973-3543-4e39-a15 c- c1a307db4116-27724649 Social and Behavioral responsible Code of Research: www.citiprogram.org/verify/?wa02e2b37-fb9f-4549-97f d-ff9437df90e4-27724651 Human Subjects Research: www.citiprogram.org/verify/?k1b43cffe-12b8-4cd7-b43 f- 3ddc4e059bfe-25128547 INVESTIGATOR’S ASSURANCE I certify that the information provided in this application is complete and correct. I understand that as Principal Investigator, I have ultimate responsibilit y for the protection of the rights and welfare of human participants, conduct of the study and the ethical performance of the project . I agree to comply with all Mercy College policies and procedures, as well as with all applicable federal, state and local laws regarding the protection of human participants in research, includ ing, but not limited to, the following: The project will be performed by qualified personnel according to the MC I RB certified protocol, No changes will be made in the protocol or consent form until approved by the MC IRB, Legally effective informed consent will be obtained from human participants if applicable, and Adverse events will be reported to the MC IRB in a timely manner. I have completed the required educational program on ethical principles and regulatory r equirements. I further certify that the proposed research is not currently underway and will not begin until approval has been obtained. ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______July 5, 2018 ________ Alexandrea Ravenelle, PhD, Principal Investigator Date FACULTY SPONSOR’S ASSURANCE MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 16 of 12 By my signature as sponsor on this research application, I certify that the student or guest investigator is knowledgeable about the regulations and policies governing research with human partici pants and has sufficient training and experience to conduct this particular study in accord with the approved protocol. In addition, I agree to meet with the investigator on a regular basis to monitor study progr ess, Should problems arise during the course of the study, I agree to be available, personally, to supervise the investigator in solving them, I insure that the investigator will promptly report significant or unt oward adverse effects to the MC IRB in a timely manner, If I will be unavailable, as when on sabbatical leave or vacation, I wil l arrange for an alternate faculty sponsor to assume responsibility during my absence and I will advise the MC IRB by letter of such arrangements, and I have insured that the investigator completed the required educational program on ethical principles and regulatory requirements. I further certify that the proposed research is not currently underway and will not begin until approval has been obtained. ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________ Faculty Sponsor * (if PI is a student or a fellow) Date *The faculty sponsor must be a member of the MC faculty. The faculty member is consi dered the responsible party for legal and ethical performance of the project. MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 16 of 12 By my signature as sponsor on this research application, I certify that the student or guest investigator is knowledgeable about the regulations and policies governing research with human partici pants and has sufficient training and experience to conduct this particular study in accord with the approved protocol. In addition, I agree to meet with the investigator on a regular basis to monitor study progr ess, Should problems arise during the course of the study, I agree to be available, personally, to supervise the investigator in solving them, I insure that the investigator will promptly report significant or unt oward adverse effects to the MC IRB in a timely manner, If I will be unavailable, as when on sabbatical leave or vacation, I wil l arrange for an alternate faculty sponsor to assume responsibility during my absence and I will advise the MC IRB by letter of such arrangements, and I have insured that the investigator completed the required educational program on ethical principles and regulatory requirements. I further certify that the proposed research is not currently underway and will not begin until approval has been obtained. ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________ Faculty Sponsor * (if PI is a student or a fellow) Date *The faculty sponsor must be a member of the MC faculty. The faculty member is consi dered the responsible party for legal and ethical performance of the project. MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 16 of 12 By my signature as sponsor on this research application, I certify that the student or guest investigator is knowledgeable about the regulations and policies governing research with human partici pants and has sufficient training and experience to conduct this particular study in accord with the approved protocol. In addition, I agree to meet with the investigator on a regular basis to monitor study progr ess, Should problems arise during the course of the study, I agree to be available, personally, to supervise the investigator in solving them, I insure that the investigator will promptly report significant or unt oward adverse effects to the MC IRB in a timely manner, If I will be unavailable, as when on sabbatical leave or vacation, I wil l arrange for an alternate faculty sponsor to assume responsibility during my absence and I will advise the MC IRB by letter of such arrangements, and I have insured that the investigator completed the required educational program on ethical principles and regulatory requirements. I further certify that the proposed research is not currently underway and will not begin until approval has been obtained. ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________ Faculty Sponsor * (if PI is a student or a fellow) Date *The faculty sponsor must be a member of the MC faculty. The faculty member is consi dered the responsible party for legal and ethical performance of the project. MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 16 of 12 By my signature as sponsor on this research application, I certify that the student or guest investigator is knowledgeable about the regulations and policies governing research with human partici pants and has sufficient training and experience to conduct this particular study in accord with the approved protocol. In addition, I agree to meet with the investigator on a regular basis to monitor study progr ess, Should problems arise during the course of the study, I agree to be available, personally, to supervise the investigator in solving them, I insure that the investigator will promptly report significant or unt oward adverse effects to the MC IRB in a timely manner, If I will be unavailable, as when on sabbatical leave or vacation, I wil l arrange for an alternate faculty sponsor to assume responsibility during my absence and I will advise the MC IRB by letter of such arrangements, and I have insured that the investigator completed the required educational program on ethical principles and regulatory requirements. I further certify that the proposed research is not currently underway and will not begin until approval has been obtained. ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________ Faculty Sponsor * (if PI is a student or a fellow) Date *The faculty sponsor must be a member of the MC faculty. The faculty member is consi dered the responsible party for legal and ethical performance of the project. MC IRB Application Form – Initial Review Page 16 of 12 By my signature as sponsor on this research application, I certify that the student or guest investigator is knowledgeable about the regulations and policies governing research with human partici pants and has sufficient training and experience to conduct this particular study in accord with the approved protocol. In addition, I agree to meet with the investigator on a regular basis to monitor study progr ess, Should problems arise during the course of the study, I agree to be available, personally, to supervise the investigator in solving them, I insure that the investigator will promptly report significant or unt oward adverse effects to the MC IRB in a timely manner, If I will be unavailable, as when on sabbatical leave or vacation, I wil l arrange for an alternate faculty sponsor to assume responsibility during my absence and I will advise the MC IRB by letter of such arrangements, and I have insured that the investigator completed the required educational program on ethical principles and regulatory requirements. I further certify that the proposed research is not currently underway and will not begin until approval has been obtained. ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________ Faculty Sponsor * (if PI is a student or a fellow) Date *The faculty sponsor must be a member of the MC faculty. The faculty member is consi dered the responsible party for legal and ethical performance of the project.
Research Assignment: IRB Proposal This is connected to previous assignments. This wil connect to my final proposal. Use your research to complete the IRB Proposal. Please complete and upload your inf
MC IRB Protocol No.: ________________________ Date of IRB Review: ________________________ For office use only PROJECT TITLE The Relationship Between Gender and Time Management Among College Students PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Degree(s) Campus Phone Number Cope, Stephanie M. (914)557-4927 Department Campus Mailing Address Connect/Mercy E-mail Address Behavioral Science 555 Broadway Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 [email protected] FACULTY SPONSOR Name (Last, First) Degree(s) Campus Phone Number Kraetzer, Mary C. Ph.D. (914) 674 7341 Department Campus Mailing Address Mercy E-mail Address Social Science Mahoney Hall 202 [email protected] List all co-investigators below, including those from other institutions STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phone # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phone # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phone # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address STUDENT-INVESTIGATOR Name (Last, First) Phone # Connect E-mail Address Mailing Address 2 Check the proposed research category: Category I (Administrative Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] Category II (Expedited Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] Category III (Full Review) Email the application packet to [email protected] FUNDING SOURCES Check all of the appropriate boxes for funding sources for this research. Include pending funding source(s). If federally funded, provide name and address of individual to whom certification of IRB approval should be sent: Name Address line 1 Address line 2 City, State, Zip Federal Grant Faculty Development Grant Personal Funds Department Gift Commercial – company name: Other: None Attach the research proposal/protocol that was sent to the agency, committee, or sponsor for peer-review of scientific merit if applicable. DATA COLLECTION OR COLLABORATING SITES If the participants are to be recruited from an institution or organization (e.g., hospital, social service agency, prison, school, etc.) or from a privately owned business (private practice, local sports gym, etc.), documentation of permission from the institution must be submitted to the committee before final approval can be given. Letters of permission (on organization’s letterhead) from a senior office of the institution, organization, or business should authorize the investigator(s) to contact potential participants, to use the facilities, or access the records of that entity. If this project is being reviewed by any other human participants research review group (e.g., hospital institutional review board), a copy of the approval of that institutional must be attached or a statement of the status of the review must be noted. List all collaborating and data collection sites Provide certification or letter of IRB approval Provide letters of cooperation or support (as appropriate) 1. Mercy College Attached Will follow N/A Attached Will follow N/A 2. Attached Will follow N/A Attached Will follow N/A Briefly state the problem, the present knowledge relevant to it, and the aims and significance of the proposed research. Cite appropriate literature. Differences between genders have been studied through multiple topics. Most recently, gender differences based on time management and the levels of stress variance between females and males have become prominent. According to a study at Buffalo University, 25 % of students become chronic procrastinators by the time they reach college. Academic futures are the concern of the students, yet behaviors such as academic failure, lack of motivation, and unsure career paths deter college level students from completing assignments by the due dates or deadlines (Heibutzki, 2009). In addition to procrastination increasing, the levels of stress have also increased. Time management is planning one’s time effectively in order to be productive at one’s greatest potential (Woods, 2005). When students’ lack time management skills, their stress increases, which affects their health and well-being. Stress has been linked to poor time management skills through empirical studies and literature. Studying habits, for example, is one. In one study, in-coming freshmen were asked on their study habits; findings were as follows: Men reported having poorer studying habits than females. Furthermore, males reported to have a higher dislike towards reading than females. With the rate of more females in college than males, in the United States specifically, females also react more positively to studying for all their classes, even the ones they dislike, more than males (Sigler, 2012). Previous studies have used broad surveys across community colleges and universities which lead to the conclusions that women have better time management skills, yet have a higher stress levels. The empirical study that will be conducted will be surveying Mercy College Students in Dobbs Ferry in order to investigate the relationship between gender and time management skills. Stress will also be measured in order to see if stress can be linked to these differences. It is hypothesized that females utilize their stress in order to motivate themselves through tasks, while males find alternate routes to alleviate their stress. Works Cited Heibutzki, R. (2009). How Lack of Time Management Affects College Students. Seattle PI, Retrieved October 19, 2015. Sigler, E. (2012). Male academic performance in college: The possible role of study strategies. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13, 227-241. Tremayne, K. (2014). Time Management Survey. My Time Management, Retrieved October 26, 2015. Weinstein, C. (1987). LASSI (Learning and Study Strategies Inventory). H&H Publising Company, INC. Retrieved October 26, 2015. Woods, C. (2005). What is Time Management? Study.com,  Retrieved October 19, 2015. Describe the tasks/tests or procedures participants will be asked to complete. A study on time management and stress will be conducted with a convenience sample of at least 50 Mercy College students. An anonymous survey questionnaire will be given to the participants with ten closed ended questions and one open ended question. Participants will be asked to read the waiver form and complete the survey. This survey will take five to ten minutes to complete. In early November, the study will be given to Mercy College students’ prior to class. If participants will come in contact with any mechanical, electrical or other equipment, the form entitled Utilizing Research Equipment with Human Participants must be completed by the investigator and a verified safety check. N/A A. Description of the Human Participants and the Recruitment Procedures Participant Population Anticipated number: Male 25 Female 25 Total 50 Age Range (check all that apply): 0 – 7 yrs. (submit parental permission form) 8 – 17 yrs. (submit child’s assent form, parental permission form) 18 – 64 yrs. (submit consent form) 65+ yrs. (submit consent form) Source/type of participants: (check all that apply) Mercy College Employees Mercy College Students Inpatients or Outpatients Community Volunteers Other: Specify State any relationship (past or present) the researcher may have with the potential participants: The researcher is a Mercy College student and participants may be familiar with her as a classmate. Location of participants during research data collection (check all that apply): Participant’s home Mercy College locations: specify Dobbs Ferry Local hospitals: specify Community settings: specify Other institutions: specify Elementary schools: specify Secondary schools: specify Other: specify Describe populations to be excluded from the research. NONE Special populations to be included in the research (check all that apply): minors under age 18 pregnant women fetus/fetal tissue prisoners economically disadvantaged other: specify Provide rationale for using special populations. The groups listed in (f) above are considered “vulnerable” or require special consideration by the federal regulatory agencies and by the IRB. Recruitment Procedures Describe how participants will be identified and recruited. Attach all recruitment information, e.g., advertisements, bulletin board notices, and recruitment letters for all types of media (printed, radio, email, electronic, TV, or Internet). As a training study, students will be selected from other social science classes arranged by the professor. (Classes taught by Professor Martin Kelly, Mary Kraetzer, Ellen Sperber, or Kevin Kulik). Researcher will contact social science faculty. Initial Contact. Student investigator will approach classmates before class starts. List criteria for inclusion and exclusion of participants in this study. Inclusion: All students present that are 18 years old or older and are Mercy College students will be asked to participate. Exclusion: People under 18 years old and non- Mercy College students. How will the inclusion/exclusion criteria be assessed and by whom? The primary investigator will review the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Will participants receive incentives before or rewards after the study (e.g., academic credit, money)? If yes, explain. (Note: this information must be outlined in the consent document.) Yes No Will the participants be charged for research-related procedures? For example, will participants be charged for extra tests/services related to the research? If yes, explain charges, including estimated amounts. Will there be financial coverage for the extra costs? If yes, explain. (Note: this information must be included in the consent document.) Yes No B. Risks and Benefits of the Research Identify the risks (current and potential) and describe the expected frequency, degree of severity, and potential reversibility. This study involves minimal risk. Does the research involve (check all that apply): administration of drugs, and chemical or biological agents administration of physical stimuli changes in diet or exercise use of private records (medical or educational records) possible invasion of privacy of participant or family deprivation of physiological requirements such as nutrition or sleep manipulation of psychological or social variables such as sensory deprivation, social isolation, psychological stresses the collection of personal or sensitive information in surveys or interviews use of a deceptive technique (If use of deception is part of the experimental protocol, the protocol must include a “debriefing procedure” [provide this procedure for IRB review] which will be followed upon completion of the study, or withdrawal of the participants.) presentation of materials that participants might consider offensive, threatening, or degrading other risks: specify Describe the precautions taken to minimize risk: Participants can withdraw at any time. Care of participants in case of an accident: Describe the provisions that have been made for the care of the participant in the event of an accident or complication related to the research procedure. Students that state they feel distressed by their participation will be referred to Mercy College counseling center. Why are the risks and inconveniences are mentioned above reasonable? What is the expected scientific yield from the project? The results will provide a deeper understanding of college students, differences between gender, and reasons procrastination has increased. Benefits of participation: Increased knowledge of social science research procedures. C. Confidentiality of Data Describe provisions made to maintain confidentiality of data. Only the researcher will have access to the data. Data will be coded and analyzed by myself. The coding will relate to Claire E. Weinstein’s LASSI questionnaire. Data will be store in a locked file cabinet in the office of the course instructor, Dr. Kraetzer. Study participants will be informed of this procedure in the Cover Letter. Where will the data be kept and for how long? How will audio and video tapes be disposed of? Data will be locked in the office of Dr. Kraetzer until the end of the academic school year 2015-2016. Will the research data and information be part of the medical chart, academic record, or other permanent record? (Explain here and in the consent form.) Yes No D. Informed Consent Process: Simply giving a consent form to a participant does not constitute informed consent. The following questions pertain to the process. Researchers are cautioned that consent forms should be written in simple declarative sentences. The forms should be jargon-free. Foreign language versions should be prepared for any applicable research. Capacity to consent. Will all adult participants have the capacity to give informed consent? Yes No If not, describe the likely range of impairment and explain how, and by whom, their capacity to consent will be determined. Note: In research involving more than minimal risk, capacity to consent should be determined by a psychiatrist, clinical psychologist, or other qualified professional not otherwise involved in the research. Individuals who lack the capacity to consent may participate in research only if a legally authorized representative gives consent on their behalf. Is the informed consent document attached? Yes No How will participants’ understanding be assessed? What questions will be asked to assess the participants’ understanding; will there be written responses; will understanding be assessed at other points in time? Participants’ understanding will be assessed through answering the survey. Using SPSS, a cross tabulation will be used to analyze which gender procrastinates more, and what distracts each gender. The data will assessed across a few months. In relation to the actual data gathering, when and where will consent be discussed and documentation obtained, for example, immediately prior to the data collection or several days before? Consent will be gathered immediately prior to the survey. The form will be given first and participants will be asked to read the form. If agree to the research, a survey will be handed to them after. Will the investigator(s) be securing all of the informed consents? Yes No Are you requesting Waiver or Alteration of Informed Consent? Yes No An IRB may approve a consent which does not include, or alters, some or all of the elements of informed consent (e.g., oral consent). Provide justifications for the following questions for requesting a waiver of written informed consent – answer a – d only if you are requesting a waiver. Why does the proposed research present no more than minimal risk to the participants? The study is of a non-sensitive topic of Time Management and Stress. Data will be collected using paper anonymous questionnaires which will be returned to the investigator in a box. Why will a waiver of informed consent not adversely affect the rights and welfare of participants? Time Management is interesting but not sensitive. Why is it impracticable to carry out the research without a waiver or alteration of informed consent? Having the name of respondent offers less protection to the respondent than an anonymous questionnaire with a cover letter, does. How will pertinent information be provided to the participants, if appropriate, at a later date? No plan to provide information. Even if waiver of written informed consent is granted, you may be required to obtain verbal permission which reflects elements of the written consent (if appropriate). Please specify below the information to be read/given to the research participants.  Dear Fellow Student:   You are being asked to participate in a study on time management and stress levels of Mercy College students.  This study is being done by Stephanie Cope, an undergraduate student at Mercy College, who is completing this project as part of a Bachelor of Science degree in Behavioral Science.   As part of this study you will be asked to complete a questionnaire that should take 5-10 minutes.  All of the study information will be kept private.  The questionnaire is anonymous.  The researcher will not be able to connect your name or other identifier to your questionnaire. You will not be identified in any publication or presentation of study findings.  Only group scores will be reported.  All documents from this study will be kept in a locked file cabinet in the office of Dr. Mary Kraetzer, the Mercy College faculty mentor for this project.   Your decision whether or not to participate will not affect your current or future relations with Mercy College or the class that you are attending prior to which this questionnaire is being distributed.  There is very little direct benefit to you for your participation in this study.  You are helping a fellow student.  You are also learning a little bit about social science research.  If you decide to participate, you are free to withdraw at any time without affecting this relationship.  You may also choose not to answer questions on the questionnaire.  You are encouraged to ask any questions regarding the research to Dr. Mary Kraetzer, who may be reached at 914 674 7341.  The Institutional Review Board (IRB)  of Mercy College has approved recruitment of participants for this research study.  Professor Brian Baker, the IRB chairperson, can be contacted to answer questions about the rights of research participants at 718 678 8812 or [email protected]  The principal investigator can be contacted at (914)557-4927 within the semester for information regarding the outcome of the study.   Please keep this for your records.   Sincerely, Sign your name in an Italics font. Type Your Name E. Investigator Training Describe the investigator(s) training and experience to conduct the research All students have participated in the NIH Ethics Course and have received certification for completing course as well as discussion of issues in class. INVESTIGATOR’S ASSURANCE I certify that the information provided in this application is complete and correct. I understand that as Principal Investigator, I have ultimate responsibility for the protection of the rights and welfare of human participants, conduct of the study and the ethical performance of the project. I agree to comply with all Mercy College policies and procedures, as well as with all applicable federal, state and local laws regarding the protection of human participants in research, including, but not limited to, the following: The project will be performed by qualified personnel according to the MC IRB certified protocol, No changes will be made in the protocol or consent form until approved by the MC IRB, • Legally effective informed consent will be obtained from human participants if applicable, and Adverse events will be reported to the MC IRB in a timely manner. I have completed the required educational program on ethical principles and regulatory requirements. I further certify that the proposed research is not currently underway and will not begin until approval has been obtained. __Stephanie M. Cope_________ __11/18/15_ Principal Investigator Date FACULTY SPONSOR’S ASSURANCE By my signature as sponsor on this research application, I certify that the student or guest investigator is knowledgeable about the regulations and policies governing research with human participants and has sufficient training and experience to conduct this particular study in accord with the approved protocol. In addition, I agree to meet with the investigator on a regular basis to monitor study progress, Should problems arise during the course of the study, I agree to be available, personally, to supervise the investigator in solving them, I insure that the investigator will promptly report significant or untoward adverse effects to the MC IRB in a timely manner, If I will be unavailable, as when on sabbatical leave or vacation, I will arrange for an alternate faculty sponsor to assume responsibility during my absence and I will advise the MC IRB by letter of such arrangements, and I have insured that the investigator completed the required educational program on ethical principles and regulatory requirements. I further certify that the proposed research is not currently underway and will not begin until approval has been obtained. _____________________________________________________________________________ ________________________ Faculty Sponsor* (if PI is a student or a fellow) Date *The faculty sponsor must be a member of the MC faculty. The faculty member is considered the responsible party for legal and ethical performance of the project. Page 0 of 1