case study corrections abortion amp privilege

Most of my feedback in the comment section of the paper are regarding your application of concepts. Your title includes “privilege” but that concept is not defined, conceptualized and used as an analytical frame for discussion Pro-choice and Pro-life perspectives. Another theme of my comments is that some of your statements assert a singular way of being. When you use terms like “always” or “singular”, especially when it comes to humans, this conceptualization is not accurate. Your recommendation section needs some tangible strategies of what you suggest to achieve a stated outcome. It would be powerful to somewhere in your paper include the example of Idaho approving a pro-life liscence plate but not won supporting justice and love (Too Great to Hate by the Human Rights Commission was not approved).