m4 research design critique report

 Must be original it will ran through TurnItIn

 

The idea is center around being a teacher and over standardized test in the school districts and narrowed down to the hispanic results

 

 

 

 

 

M4 Research Design Critique Report

Texas A&M University-Commerce

 

 

M4 Research Design Critique Report

Provide a scenario of how you would use an experimental design to conduct a research study. Include measures that you would take to address potential threats to internal validity. Explain whether conducting a quasi- or true-experimental design would be most feasible for your scenario and why.

Differentiate between the three forms of mixed-methods designs and highlight reasons as to why researchers would implement a mixed-methods approach to collect data for a study.

Highlight how action research is different from formal research and reasons as to why researchers would choose to conduct action research to collect data for a study.

First Article Summary

Provide a paragraph, which highlights the purpose of study and research questions that the author(s) attempted to address. When you refer to this particular study, simply identify this research by citing the author(s) and date. I would then like for you to provide the full APA reference at the conclusion of this document.

Summation of Research Literature

This section should summarize in two or three paragraphs previous research that the authors found that led to their particular study.

Method for Collecting and Analyzing Data

            This section needs to highlight in two or three paragraphs the method that was used to collect data and how data were analyzed.

Results and Conclusions

            This section needs to summarize in two or three paragraphs the results of this study and address conclusions and recommendations made by the authors

            Second Article Summary

Purpose of Study

Summation of Research Literature

Method for Collecting and Analyzing Data

Results and Conclusions

References

            Please list your two references in APA format. Don’t forget to list in alphabetical order based upon first author.

 

	EDAD 595 Module (3, 4, 5) Grading Rubric CLAQWA (modified), Flateby & Metzger – University of South Florida
Points	Assignment Requirements
5	Addresses and develops each aspect of the assignment and goes beyond the assignment prompt to address additional related material.
4	Addresses each aspect of the assignment.
3	Addresses the appropriate topic and partially fulfills assignment requirements.
2	Addresses the appropriate topic, but omits most or all of the assignment requirements.
1	Off topic or vaguely addresses the topic.
	Quality of Details
5	Provides details that help develop each element of the text and provide supporting statements, evidence or examples necessary to explain or persuade effectively.
4	Provides details that support the elements of the text with sufficient clarity, depth and accuracy.
3	Provides details that are related to the elements of the text, but do not support those elements with sufficient clarity, depth or accuracy.
2	Provides details that are loosely related to the elements of the text, but are lacking clarity, depth and accuracy.
1	Provides details that do not develop the elements of the text.
	Quantity of Details
5	All points are supported by a sufficient number of details.
4	All points are developed, but some may need additional details.
3	Additional details are needed to develop some points.
2	Additional details are needed to develop most points.
1	Virtually no details are present.
	Grammar and Mechanics
5	Sentences are grammatically and mechanically correct.
4	Rare grammatical and mechanical errors exist, but do not affect readability.
3	A limited variety of grammatical errors exist.
2	A variety of grammatical errors appear throughout the text possibly affecting readability.
1	Most sentences exhibit multiple grammatical and mechanical errors, obstructing meaning.
	Earned Point Total:     /20