Review the Case Opener on p.84 (Wrap Up on p. 97) and discuss whether you agree with the court’s decision. Be sure to consider the following questions:
- Do you consider a dog to be a “good” under the UCC? Why or why no?
- Do you consider Vicidomine a merchant under the UCC? Why or why not?
- What damages do you think should be able to recover?
- What type of evidence should Budd have to present in order to recover damages?
- What types of argument might Vicidomine present in order to negate Budd’s claims for damages beyond the purchase price?
Make an initial post that is responsive to the above prompt.
Your post must be between 200-500 words.