Write a 4 page essay. Consider the characteristics studied by these researchers, such as hierarchy, time, neutral vs. emotional, human nature, and so forth. Write a 3-5 page essay outlining tactics

Write a 4 page essay. Consider the characteristics studied by these researchers, such as hierarchy, time, neutral vs. emotional, human nature, and so forth. Write a 3-5 page essay outlining tactics
6 – 3 HR Article Analysis: Improving Performance Review the article “ Mutual Perception of Russian and French Managers ” from The International Journal of Human Resource Management (Muratbekova – Touron, 2011) http://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=60610752&site=eds – live&scope=site (Must be logged into Shapiro Library at SNHU to access.) Consider the characteristics studied by these researchers, such as hierarchy, time, neutral vs. emotional, human nature, and so forth . Write a 3 – 5 page essay outlining tactics a n HR manager can take to improve work performance, considering differences in cultural perception and stereotypes. Use your experience, the research, and the lecture to create a plan to approach these differences as a n HR Manager. In your article analysis: a. Briefly summarize the article (1 – 3 paragraphs) . b. Identify and describe the characteristics studied by the researchers c. Consider differences in cultural perception and stereotypes . d. Create a management plan outlining tactics a n HR manager can implement to improve work performance, based on readings, research, and your experience . Guidelines The article analysis must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12 – point Times New Roman font, one – inch margins, and APA citations . Page length requirements: 3 – 5 pages, not including cover page and references. Rubric for Article Analysis Two /Module Six Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value Summary of the article N/A Includes a brief summary of the article (10 0% ) N/A Does not includes a summary of the article (0 % ) 10 Discussion of research characteristics Submission meets “Proficient” and i nclude s other characteristics in addition to those listed ( 100% ) Discusses characteristics studied by the researchers: hierarchy, time, neutral vs. emotional, human nature ( 90% ) Only discusses 1 – 2 of the characteristics studied by the researchers ( 70% ) Does not discuss characteristics studied by the researchers (0 % ) 20 D ifferences in cultural perception and stereotypes Submission meets “Proficient” and includes illustrative examples ( 100% ) Considers differences in cultural perception and stereotypes, and how they might be overcome ( 90% ) Considers differences in cultural perception and/or stereotypes in only a basic manner ( 70% ) Does not consider differences in cultural perception and stereotypes (0 % ) 20 Management plan/ tactics for improving performance around researched charac teristics Submission meets “Proficient” and extends explanation to include supporting evidence from scholarly resources ( 100% ) Suggests 2 – 4 tactics in a plan for improving performance ( 90% ) Suggests only a single tactic for improving performance, or the tactic(s) suggested are not appropriate ( 70% ) Does not suggests tactics for improving performance (0 % ) 20 Course Vocabulary Meets “ Proficient ” and integrates the course vocabulary into all aspects of the analysis ( 100% ) Applies vocabulary for HR throughout case study ( 90% ) Lists some vocabulary or phrases, but it is not connected to the context of the questions ( 70% ) Does not include HR vocabulary (0 % ) 15 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy – to – read format ( 100% ) Submission has no major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization ( 90% ) Submission has major errors related to grammar, spellin g, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas ( 70% ) Submission has critical errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas (0 % ) 15 Total 100 %