Leadership in disaster management

Water fluoridation to reduce tooth decay in AustraliaOrder Type: ReportLevel: –Subject: leadership in disaster managementSources: 25Style: –Standard: MastersLangauge: English (U.S.)Pages: 14Order Topic:Water fluoridation to reduce tooth decay in AustraliaInstructions:Drawing on a relevant policy analysis framework, critically evaluate the formulation and implementation process of a particular government health policy. This task should: 1. Provide a comprehensive overview of issue, including a contextual assessment; identification of stakeholders, their interests and influence; and a critical evaluation of evidence used in the identification and prioritization of the issue. (10 marks) 2. Critically examine the policy formulation process and resultant policy. This should encompass an assessment of the policy type, instruments, programs or initiatives adopted, and/or any other policy development or consultation processes. (10 marks) 3. Evaluate the implementation planning process and draw on any relevant implementation frameworks and assessments of implementation to provide to critical discussions on adherence with the planning processes. (10 marks) 4. Drawing on evaluation findings and any comparative evidence from similar policies to critically assess the policy’s impact in line with its intended objectives. (10 marks) 5. In light of your assessment, identify and discuss policy strengths and weaknesses which could feed into future policy iterations. (5 marks) The assessment item will also be valued for presentation, writing style, line of argument and referencing (5 marks)

Water fluoridation to reduce tooth decay in Australia

Drawing on a relevant policy analysis framework, critically evaluate the formulation and implementation process of a particular government health policy. This task should: 1. Provide a comprehensive overview of issue, including a contextual assessment; identification of stakeholders, their interests and influence; and a critical evaluation of evidence used in the identification and prioritisation of the issue. (10 marks) 2. Critically examine the policy formulation process and resultant policy. This should encompass an assessment of the policy type, instruments, programs or initiatives adopted, and/or any other policy development or consultation processes. (10 marks) 3. Evaluate the implementation planning process and draw on any relevant implementation frameworks and assessments of implementation to provide to critical discuss on adherence with the planning processes. (10 marks) 4. Drawing on evaluation findings and any comparative evidence from similar policies to critically assess the policy’s impact in line with its intended objectives. (10 marks) 5. In light of your assessment, identify and discuss policy strengths and weaknesses which could feed into future policy iterations. (5 marks) The assessment item will also be valued for presentation, writing style, line of argument and referencing (5 marks)

Drawing on a relevant policy analysis framework, critically evaluate the formulation and implementation process of a particular government health policy. You should: • Provide a comprehensive overview of issue; • Critically examine the policy formulation process and resultant policy; • Evaluate the implementation planning process and provide to critical discuss on adherence with the planning processes; • Critically assess the policy’s impact in line with its intended objectives; • Identify and discuss policy strengths and weaknesses which could feed into future policy iterations.