Research Discussion Board Week 5

Based on your course reading assignments (Chapters 6 and 7) as well as your pending identified research problem :Breast Cancer in young women

1. What type of study do you believe you are conducting, and

2. please explain why?

Please remember that your initial post should be no greater than 250 words, the equivalent of of three (3) paragraphs, 4-5 lines each. All posts must include reference/s.no less than 5 years.

APA STYLE

 

Do you think that of Johnson’s nursing diagnostic and treatment process allows the nurse to meet the standards of care practice requirements for assessment, planning, implementation, and evaluation?

More than 250 words .

3 references less than 5 years

Discussion, APA 6, 3 References

Visit the following website and answer the following question.

https://nurse.org/resources/family-nurse-practitioner/

After reviewing the different setting in which Family Nurse Practitioners work. What setting will be your career choice and why?

Discussion 5-2 Why might the development and morphing of roles based on gaps in medicine be problematic for advancement of APRNs? What actions might a nurse take to reduce this?

There are three troublesome issues that have emerged in the advancement of APRN practice. These issues in APRN include: 1) the clear role development and morphed to fill gaps in services; 2) the lack of clarity regarding role uniqueness; and 3) the dearth in nursing specific outcomes. From your readings this week, discuss 1 of the 3 questions. Begin your discussion with the question you will be addressing.

  1. Why might the development and morphing of roles based on gaps in medicine be problematic for advancement of APRNs? What actions might a nurse take to reduce this?
  2. In what ways can an APRN distinguish his or her role from other nursing roles and medical counterparts? Why might this be important?
  3. How can APRNs encourage nursing-based outcome studies?

Expectations

  • Length: A minimum of 250 words, not including references
  • Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years

Week 4 Assignment — Con-Position Paper

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: pp. 69-81
  • Lesson
  • Week 3 Assignment
  • Link (Word doc): Con-Paper TemplatePreview the document
  • Minimum of 3 academic articles (from the Week 3 Assignment)

Apply the following writing resources to your posts:

Instructions
For this assignment, complete the following:

  • Review the Toulmin-model outline (Week 2 Lesson) and your completed Week 3 Assignment (Con-Position Proposal). Assess any feedback provided by the professor and/or your peers.
  • Compose a position paper representing the con side of your new topic. (See the Con-Paper Template). The paper should include approximately 6 developed paragraphs:
    • Introduction (with thesis statement)
    • Context paragraph
    • 3 body paragraphs (focusing on 3 cons)
    • Conclusion
  • Apply a formal tone appropriate for academic audiences, maintaining an objective 3rd person point of view – no 1st person (I, me, my, we, our, us, mine) or 2nd person (you, your). Avoid contractions, clichés, and slang terminology.
  • Use the provided template to assist in formatting the title page and document.
  • Incorporate at least 3 scholarly sources into the paper. Cite all sources in APA format, both parenthetically and on a reference page.
  • Before submission, proofread and edit carefully for spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Not every error will be flagged automatically in word-processing programs, and some that are flagged as errors are actually correct.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 2-3 pages (not including the title or reference pages)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page (minimum of 3 academic articles)

Grading
This activity will be graded using the Con-Position Paper Grading Rubric.

Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 6

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday