your literature review should include the following:

Research Background.
Consider: Why is it important or necessary for this advocacy/awareness to happen?
Why is the topic important (covered in your introduction)?
What were the characteristics of the population studied?
What is the problem statement (also covered in your introduction)
What researchers did to try to solve the problem (covered in your methods section)
What you found (covered in your results section)
What you think your findings mean (covered in your discussion section.)

here is the link to one reference: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC74811…

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC74811… heres another article you can reference

 

Select a topic within sport psychology from the book: Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology by Robert Weinberg and Daniel Gould

Introduction

Varying suggestions: 4-5 paragraphs elaborating on thesis;

Could be 3/4’s of a page; probably not more than 1.5 pages (optional)

Literature review

These are the sources you identified on your topic; 6-8 sources; should 

principally be books and journal articles, may include web & news stories; 

however the latter should be few

Analysis

This section is your commentary on the literature review

Discussion

This section is your perspective on the paper; your motivation for this 

paper; your thoughts on how your original perspectives may have been 

modified/changed by what you found during the literature review; how 

this area is in need of change; your opinions on the topic overall; 

recommendations, etc.

Summary and Conclusion

Footnotes

Can be in the body of paper; at the bottom of the page; can be end notes 

Week 2

Discussion

Choose and respond to one
of the following questions:

Question A

Using two concepts
from the reading (e.g. polypotency, artifact/idea, STS, etc…), critique the
myth of moral neutrality of technology. Provide some reasons to the effect that
technological development can be morally good or bad.

Question B

Do you think that the
ties between social circumstances and technology, thoroughly discussed in the
readings, should be a part of the definition of “technology?” Why or why not?

Use at least two of
this week’s readings as resources in your initial post.

Respose to the following:

Controlling is a function of management and is an integral part of the overall method of managing operations. As such, it is the duty of managers at all levels of the organization to:

1- Recognize and estimate the exposures to lose or risk, which relate to their particular field of practice.

2- Designate and establish policies, plans, and operating standards, procedures, systems, and other disciplines to be used to minimize, mitigate, and limit the risks associated with the exposures identified.

3- Set practical controlling processes that require and encourage directors, officers, and employees to carry out their duties and responsibilities in the most professional manner.

4- Keep the effectiveness of the controlling processes they have established and foster continuous improvement to these processes.

Corrective controls are formulated to correct errors or risks and prevent the recurrence of further mistakes. They begin when unwanted outcomes are identified and keep the focus on the problem until management can solve the problem or correct the defect. 

These are some examples of corrective controls; quality teams that address ongoing problems to correct processes, close supervision, and management review, including reviewing cost center reports.