The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and the Children’s
Internet Protection Act (CIPA) are both intended to provide protections for
children accessing the Internet. However, they both have had some opposition.
 

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:

1. Describe the main compliancy requirements and the protected information for
   both COPPA and CIPA.
2. Analyze how COPPA and CIPA are similar and how they are different, and
   explain why there is a need for two (2) different acts.
3. Describe what you believe are the most challenging elements of both COPPA
   and CIPA to implement in order to be compliant.
4. Speculate on why COPPA and CIPA define protection for different ages; COPPA
   defines a child as being under the age of 13 and CIPA defines a minor as being
   under the age of 17.
5. Identify the main opposition to COPPA and CIPA based on research and
   speculate on whether they will be changed in the future based on the
   opposition. 
6. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia
   and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources. 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch
  margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format.
  Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s
  name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and
  the reference page are not included in the required page
  length. 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment
are:

• Explain the concept of privacy and its legal protections. 
• Describe legal compliance laws addressing public and private
  institutions. 
• Use technology and information resources to research legal issues in
  information security.
• Write clearly and concisely about information security legal issues and
  topics using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.

This week’s content discussed common psychiatric disorders in the Adult and Older Adult client. Often times a secondary diagnosis is masked due to their psychiatric disorder. Review the following case study and answer the following questions.

Mr. White is a 72-year-old man, with a history of hypertension, COPD and moderate dementia, who presents with 4 days of increased confusion, nighttime restlessness, visual hallucinations, and urinary incontinence. His physical exam is unremarkable except for tachypnea, a mildly enlarged prostate, inattentiveness, and a worsening of his MMSE score from a baseline of 18 to 12 today.

Mr. White’s presentation is most consistent with an acute delirium (acute change in cognition, perceptual derangement, waxing and waning consciousness, and inattention).

1. What is the most likely diagnosis to frequently cause acute delirium in patients with dementia?
2. What additional testing should you consider if any?
3. What are treatment options to consider with this patient?

Please use references no longer than 3-5 yrs. old. and APA format.

Using the module readings as a guide, think of a way that your research question (or a similar question) could be answered using qualitative research. What type of qualitative research could be used, and how would it be conducted? What would be the strengths and weaknesses of this design compared to quantitative methods? 

For your initial post, do the following:

?  Write a post of 1 to 2 paragraphs.

?  Consider content from other parts of the course where appropriate. Use proper citation methods for your discipline when referencing scholarly orpopular sources.For your response posts, do the following:

• ?  Reply to at least two classmates outside of your own initial post thread.

?  In Module One, complete your two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern.

• ?  In Modules Two through Ten, complete your two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.

?  Demonstrate more depth and thought than saying things like “I agree” or “You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in the discussion prompt.