Chapter 20 What were some the technological advances during this period that you found to be the most interesting? What comparison, if any, do you see between the advancements in production during th

Our papers are 100% unique and written following academic standards and provided requirements. Get perfect grades by consistently using our writing services. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Rely on us and be on schedule! With our help, you'll never have to worry about deadlines again. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Chapter 20

What were some the technological advances during this period that you found to be the most interesting?  What comparison, if any, do you see between the advancements in production during this time period and now? Think about the advance of technology and the speed and scale of production.

Please see the attached rubric for grading of discussions.  Let me know if you have any questions.

Chapter 21

As defined in the chapter, what are the definitions of:

1. Liberalism

2. Socialism

3. Nationalism

How did these ideologies affect and ignite the revolutions in France and the Austrian Empire during this chapter?

Please see the attached rubric for grading of discussions.  Let me know if you have any questions.

Chapter 22

Discuss the basic beliefs of Nationalism and Socialism and how those two ideas can be seen in the unification of France, Germany, and Italy.

Please see the attached rubric for grading of discussions.  Let me know if you have any questions.

chapter 23

The “Scramble for Africa” is the most striking example of the European rush for empire and new territories. Trace the history of imperialism in Africa, being sure to identify the key developments and events.

How did it epitomize the New Imperialism?

What were the Europeans after in Africa?

How did this affect the people who were already there?

Please see the attached rubric for grading of discussions.  Let me know if you have any questions.

Chapter 20 What were some the technological advances during this period that you found to be the most interesting? What comparison, if any, do you see between the advancements in production during th
Discussion Forum Rubric Discussion Forum Rubric This course contains a weekly discussion forum. These forums are used to provide a space for conversation between course participants, based upon the week’s content. All forums are worth 20% of the overall grade. The rubric below includes the criteria, upon which, participants will be assessed for all weekly discussion forums. Original Reply Criteria Points Possible 2 1 0 Original Reply Promptness The participants initial reply was posted by Wednesday at midnight of the session week. The participants initial reply was posted by Thursday at midnight of the session week. The participants initial reply was posted after Thursday at midnight of the session week. Relevance The participant’s initial reply directly responded to all of the questions or directions specified in the assignment. The participant’s initial reply responded, in general terms, to the questions or directions specified in the assignment. The participant’s initial reply does not directly respond to the questions or directions specified in the assignment. Understanding & Examples The participant’s initial reply showed evidence they read and understood the assigned activities by including at least 2 examples and/or specific ideas in regard to the topic as well as direct references to the session’s resources that use either the author’s name(s) or the title of the resource. The participant’s initial reply showed evidence they read and understood the assigned activities by including at least 1 example and/or specific idea in regard to the topic as well as direct references to the session’s resources that use either the author’s name(s) or the title of the resource. The participant’s initial reply did not show evidence they read and understood the assigned activities—0 examples and/or specific ideas in regard to the topic as well as 0 direct references to the session’s resources that use either the author’s name(s) or the title of the resource. Quality The participant’s initial reply demonstrated outstanding professional depth and quality through appropriate application and/or synthesis of the session’s resources. The participant’s initial reply demonstrated a basic level of professional depth and quality through appropriate application and/or synthesis of the session’s resources. The participant’s initial reply does not demonstrate professional depth and quality through appropriate application and/or synthesis of the session’s resources. Discussion Forum Rubric Criteria Points Possible 2 1 0 Grammar The participant’s initial reply had no spelling, grammar, or writing convention errors. The participant’s initial reply had no more than 1 minor spelling, grammar, or writing convention errors, and it did not interfere with the readability of the response. The participant’s initial reply had more than 2 or more minor spelling, grammar, or writing convention errors, and they did interfere with the readability of the response. Replies to Peers Points Possible Criteria 5 3 0 Professionalism The participant replied to two peer’s initial forum replies by Sunday midnight ET, and the participant’s replies were professional, positive in tone, and specific to the concepts discussed in original message. The participant replied to at least one peer’s initial forum reply by Sunday midnight ET, or the participant’s replies were lacking either in professionalism, a positive tone, and/or specific to the concepts discussed in original message. The participant did not reply to any peer’s initial forum reply by Sunday midnight ET, or the participant’s replies to peers were not professional, positive in tone, and/or specific to the concepts discussed in original message. Extension of Discussion The participant’s replies to two peers extended the discussion by introducing a new idea or adding to the idea introduced in the original message. The participant replied to two peers, with only one of the participant’s replies extending the discussion by introducing a new idea or adding to the idea introduced in the original message. The participant’s replies to peers did not extend the discussion by introducing a new idea or adding to the new idea introduced in the original message, or the participant did not reply to their peers.

Writerbay.net

We offer the best essay writing services to students who value great quality at a fair price. Let us exceed your expectations if you need help with this or a different assignment. Get your paper completed by a writing expert today. Nice to meet you! Want 15% OFF your first order? Use Promo Code: FIRST15. Place your order in a few easy steps. It will take you less than 5 minutes. Click one of the buttons below.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper