Directions: Part 1: Using the “Comparison Table of Methods and Designs,” ( attached) evaluate the three projects or studies indicated Part 2: Refer to the information from your “Comparison Table of M

Directions: Part 1: Using the “Comparison Table of Methods and Designs,” ( attached) evaluate the three projects or studies indicated Part 2: Refer to the information from your “Comparison Table of M
Appendix Comparison Table of Methods and Designs APA Reference (Include the GCU permalink or working link used to access the article.) Research Methodology and Design Setting/Sample Setting characteristics Sampling type (e.g., convenience, purposive, systematic) Number of participants Instrumentation Identify the instrument Number of questions and how they are answered (e.g., open ended, multiple choice, Likert scale) Include how the data was collected. Reliability Reliability type (e.g., interrater, test-retest, internal) Psychometric data (e.g., Cronbach’s alpha) Validity Validity type (e.g., construct, content, face) Psychometric data (e.g., sensitivity, specificity) Levels of Measurement (Identify independent and dependent variables and the associated levels of measurements.) Data Analysis Statistical significance Analysis test used © 2022. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Directions: Part 1: Using the “Comparison Table of Methods and Designs,” ( attached) evaluate the three projects or studies indicated Part 2: Refer to the information from your “Comparison Table of M
Appendix Comparison Table of Methods and Designs APA Reference (Include the GCU permalink or working link used to access the article.) Research Methodology and Design Setting/Sample Setting characteristics Sampling type (e.g., convenience, purposive, systematic) Number of participants Instrumentation Identify the instrument Number of questions and how they are answered (e.g., open ended, multiple choice, Likert scale) Include how the data was collected. Reliability Reliability type (e.g., interrater, test-retest, internal) Psychometric data (e.g., Cronbach’s alpha) Validity Validity type (e.g., construct, content, face) Psychometric data (e.g., sensitivity, specificity) Levels of Measurement (Identify independent and dependent variables and the associated levels of measurements.) Data Analysis Statistical significance Analysis test used Cheng, J.-F., Huang, X.-Y., Lin, M.-C., Wang, Y.-H., & Yeh, T.-P. (2018). A mental health home visit service partnership intervention on improving patients’ satisfaction. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 32(4), 610–616. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.010 https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselp&AN=S088394171730506X&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1 Gilad, L., Haviv, Y. S., Cohen-Glickman, I., Chinitz, D., & Cohen, M. J. (2020). Chronic drug treatment among hemodialysis patients: a qualitative study of patients, nursing and medical staff attitudes and approaches. BMC Nephrology, 21(1), 239. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01900-y Zimmerman, P.-A. P., Sladdin, I., Shaban, R. Z., Gilbert, J., & Brown, L. (2020). Factors influencing hand hygiene practice of nursing students: A descriptive, mixed-methods study. Nurse Education in Practice, 44.https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102746 https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselp&AN=S1471595318306565&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1 © 2022. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.