Group therapy can be very beneficial for clients. In fact, research has shown that for many clients, group therapy is as effective as individual therapy. Members of groups are not only able to influen

Ace your studies with our custom writing services! We've got your back for top grades and timely submissions, so you can say goodbye to the stress. Trust us to get you there!


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Group therapy can be very beneficial for clients. In fact, research has shown that for many clients, group therapy is as effective as individual therapy. Members of groups are not only able to influence change within one another, but they are often able to more easily relate to the guidance of peers than that of a therapist. With the increasing popularity of this therapeutic approach, it is essential for you to have a strong foundation in psychotherapeutic techniques for groups. Group therapy can alleviate feelings of isolation and foster a supportive and collaborative environment for sharing difficult feelings in order to facilitate healing. For many people, being part of a group that has a shared understanding of a struggle provides a unique opportunity to gain understanding of their own experiences.



THE ASSIGNMENT

In a 3- to 4-page paper, identify the video you selected and address the following:

  • What group therapy techniques were demonstrated? How well do you believe these techniques were demonstrated?
  • What evidence from the literature supports the techniques demonstrated?
  • What did you notice that the therapist did well?
  • Explain something that you would have handled differently.
  • What is an insight that you gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy?
  • Now imagine you are leading your own group session. How would you go about handling a difficult situation with a disruptive group member? How would you elicit participation in your group? What would you anticipate finding in the different phases of group therapy? What do you see as the benefits and challenges of group therapy?
  • Support your reasoning with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources, and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.

All papers submitted include a title page, introduction, THE BODY OF THE PAPER, summary, and references (in that order).

  • PsychotherapyNet. (2009, May 7). Irvin Yalom outpatient group psychotherapy  YouTube. https://youtu.be/PwnfWMNbg48
  • PDF must be available to attach

Group therapy can be very beneficial for clients. In fact, research has shown that for many clients, group therapy is as effective as individual therapy. Members of groups are not only able to influen
NRNP_6645_Week3_Assignment_Rubric NRNP_6645_Week3_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 3- to 4-page paper considering the role and efficacy of the leader of a group therapy demonstration. Be sure to address the following: ·   Describe the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated and evaluate how well they were demonstrated. . Include evidence from the literature that supports the use of the demonstrated techniques. 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% The response accurately and thoroughly describes and evaluates the efficacy of the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated in the video…. The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed evidence from the literature that supports the use of the demonstrated techniques. 22 to >19.0 pts Good 80%–89% The response accurately describes and evaluates the efficacy of the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated in the video…. The response includes evidence from the literature that supports the use of the demonstrated techniques. 19 to >17.0 pts Fair 70%–79% The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate description and evaluation of the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated in the video…. The response includes somewhat vague or inaccurate evidence from the literature to support the use of the demonstrated techniques. 17 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% The description and evaluation of the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated in the video are vague and inaccurate, or missing…. The response includes vague and inaccurate evidence from the literature to support the use of the demonstrated techniques, or is missing. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome·   Identify what the therapist did well. ·   Explain something that you would have handled differently. ·   Identify an insight that you gained form watching the therapist handle the group therapy. 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail what the therapist did well…. The response accurately and thoroughly explains something that could have been handled differently…. The response accurately and thoroughly explains an insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy. 22 to >19.0 pts Good 80%–89% The response accurately explains in detail what the therapist did well…. The response accurately explains something that could have been handled differently…. The response accurately explains an insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy. 19 to >17.0 pts Fair 70%–79% The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains in detail what the therapist did well…. The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains something that could have been handled differently…. The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains an insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy. 17 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% The response vaguely or inaccurately explains in detail what the therapist did well, or is missing…. The response vaguely or inaccurately explains something that could have been handled differently, or is missing…. The response vaguely or inaccurately explains an insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy, or is missing. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImagine that you are leading your own group session. ·   Describe how would you go about handling a difficult group member. ·   Explain how you would elicit participation in your group. ·   Describe what you would anticipate to find in different phases of the group therapy. ·   Explain the benefits and challenges of group therapy. 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% The response includes a detailed and accurate description of how to handle a difficult group member…. The response accurately and thoroughly explains how to elicit participation in group therapy…. The response thoroughly and accurately describes anticipated findings in different phases of group therapy…. The response includes a thorough and accurate explanation the benefits and challenges of group therapy. 22 to >19.0 pts Good 80%–89% The response includes a description of how to handle a difficult group member…. The response explains how to elicit participation in group therapy…. The response describes anticipated findings in different phases of group therapy…. The response explains the benefits and challenges of group therapy. 19 to >17.0 pts Fair 70%–79% The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate description of how to handle a difficult group member…. The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains how to elicit participation in group therapy…. The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately describes anticipated findings in different phases of group therapy…. The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explaination of the benefits and challenges of group therapy. 17 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% The response includes a vague or inaccurate description of how to handle a difficult group member, or is missing…. The response vaguely or inaccurately explains how to elicit participation in group therapy, or is missing…. The response vaguely or inaccurately describes anticipated findings in different phases of group therapy, or is missing…. The response includes a vague or inaccurate explaination the benefits and challenges of group therapy, or is missing. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Support your reasoning with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources, and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources. 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% Three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources are used to support the assignment. Resources selected provide strong justification for reasoning and represent the latest in standards of care. PDFs are attached. 8 to >7.0 pts Good 80%–89% Three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources are used to support the assignment. Resources selected to provide appropriate justification for reasoning and represent the latest in standards of care. PDFs are attached. 7 to >6.0 pts Fair 70%–79% Two peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources are used to support the assignment. Resources selected to provide appropriate justification for reasoning and represent the latest in standards of care. Or, three scholarly resources are used to support the assignment, but provide only weak support for reasoning or do not represent the latest in standards of care. PDFs may not be attached. 6 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Resources selected are not peer-reviewed and evidence-based, or provide poor justification for reasoning; or resources are missing. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineates all required criteria. 4 to >3.5 pts Good 80%–89% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair 70%–79% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. 3 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good 80%–89% Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair 70%–79% Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good 80%–89% Contains 1 or 2 APA format errors. 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair 70%–79% Contains 3 or 4 APA format errors. 3 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. 5 pts Total Points: 100
Group therapy can be very beneficial for clients. In fact, research has shown that for many clients, group therapy is as effective as individual therapy. Members of groups are not only able to influen
0:16 I’m like I’m like if we could go back 0:19 still to that question on impression two 0:21 people have feelings people have right 0:24 here from what they’ve seen of one 0:25 another in the Indus in this meeting 0:28 anybody got any thoughts about that 0:32 well I’m a little worried about Alice 0:35 because she’s so quiet you just sit they 0:38 don’t have very much to say this 0:40 afternoon yeah it takes me a long time 0:43 to get comfortable in this kind of group 0:46 it just seems so intense here you know 0:50 like every word is being studied I’m 0:53 just afraid to whatever others will 0:56 think about me well um I saw you smiling 1:02 earlier Alice I I felt that you were 1:05 judging me being judgmental I didn’t get 1:10 there I just felt she didn’t want to be 1:13 put on a spot Ellen I noticed that you 1:17 attempted to take the focus off of Alice 1:19 during the introductory round you seem 1:21 to be very sensitive general discomfort 1:23 well I disagree with that I don’t 1:25 believe that he was being sensitive to 1:28 her I think she should have given her 1:30 the full time to say what she had to say 1:32 I think Alan may have actually just 1:36 wanted more time for himself how you 1:40 feel about that Alice let’s check that 1:42 out it’s not true I don’t want the 1:45 spotlight you know I’m very shy and um 1:48 in fact when I go to parties I make it a 1:51 point to come in late so that I could 1:53 help the hostess clean up the glasses 1:55 how was it for you today in group Alice 1:57 no glasses to clean here no I actually I 2:02 thought about being some coffee cake at 2:04 the next meeting there may be some 2:06 glasses 2:09 that’s a mortgage experience Ellis 2:18 I just interrupt you for a minute how 2:20 long cause I think something really 2:22 important happen here just a couple 2:23 minutes ago I want to just focus on just 2:25 a second I’m really interested bobbing 2:28 in what you just said about your own gay 2:30 experience when you were younger have 2:32 you ever said that before to anyone else 2:35 Oh once saw 10 years ago to my to my 2:40 therapist and until this moment this 2:44 group you’ve never told anyone else 2:45 never told peers and no I’ve never told 2:48 any group of people that no I have a 2:51 hunch that that was a real gift to Alan 2:54 I don’t know I guess I get so wrapped up 3:02 in my own emotions I don’t think about 3:05 other people’s feelings I I guess that’s 3:08 what Betty meant when she told me about 3:10 a couple of weeks ago but an Ellen I 3:14 don’t think you’re still acknowledging 3:16 Bob’s gift to you I guess you’re right 3:23 uh I don’t know why I so difficult for 3:28 me just to come out and say thank you I 3:32 mean thank you all because because you 3:35 all been supported and you’ve all helped 3:37 me I appreciate it I got it off my chest 3:45 guys did hell you feel if you’re 3:50 finished are there other parts that you 3:52 want to work on today well I well eat 3:57 you what no not no no not not not today 4:01 as far as you want to go today 4:06 you English (auto-generated) AllFrom PsychotherapyNetRelatedListenableWatched

Writerbay.net

Looking for top-notch essay writing services? We've got you covered! Connect with our writing experts today. Placing your order is easy, taking less than 5 minutes. Click below to get started.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper