Social Issue Analysis and Response

Your skills that have been practiced throughout the course will be
assessed in this paper and conclude with you constructing your own
argument on a position. Your argument can be a contradiction, a
support, or an alteration of the argument you’ve research.
Whichever you choose should be sufficiently supported with materials
covered throughout the course and your own outside research.

This assignment should continue with the social issue research
conducted in Topic 2

In 750-1,000 words

1. Summarize the position/argument researched. This should be
   presented in a clear logical form. This includes translating their
   rhetoric into: premises and conclusion, identifying the category of
   propositions, and quality and quantity of the parts.
2. Identify the assumptions of the position by drawing inferences
   from their communicated proposition to their position regarding
   human dignity.
3. Construct a valid and sound argument that
   contradicts, challenges, or improves the position of the
   organization.

At least three academic peer-reviewed sources are required for
this paper.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment,
solid academic writing is expected. In-text citations and references
should be presented using APA Style Guide, located in the Student
Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to
beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer
to the directions in the Student Success Center.

This assignment measures programmatic competency

4.2: Examine the connections between ethical communication and
human dignity.

4.4: Construct ethical arguments.