Toy Project Part 2: The first part of this assignment was already done. Attached is the submitted part 1. Attached is also part 2 that needs to be completed.

Toy Project Part 2: The first part of this assignment was already done. Attached is the submitted part 1. Attached is also part 2 that needs to be completed.
Due: Final PowerPoint: 11:59 pm EST Sunday of Unit 7 Points: 100 Overview: You have been working at the Willie Wonka Toy Factory for approximately 6 months now. Your supervisor has given you your 6 -month employment evaluation, which was excellent. As a result of your great work, your supervisor has informed you that he has chosen you to be tasked with developing educational toys for children. You are excited about this opportunity and readily agree to tackle this challenge. You are assigned to the Research & Development (R&D) Toy Concept Committee. Your instruction is to create a prototype for a NEW, developmentally appropriate, educational toy . The committee chair (Instructor) reminds you that the toy is an organic, dynamic process, therefore, it is not possible to detail all that must go into developing your toy or final write – up. What is written below is to serve as a guide to your open -ended, creative process. You are the creator, the researcher, and the developer. You will take this project from idea inception to presenting ideas for a prototype model. You are not actually making a physical toy but are presenting the ideas in a PowerPoint written format . Pictures and/or graphs should be included. PowerPoint Presentation Instructions : Your PowerPoint presentation should address the following: 1. Name and Aspect of Development : Name your toy and identify the aspect of development (e.g., cognit ive, linguistic, socioemotional, or physical ) your toy addresses. This should be a revised version of your unit 4 slides incorporating instructor feedback. 2. Literature Review (A minimum of 3 slides) : Find and discuss at least three scholarly articles that p rovide relevant background information on the area of development you are targeting (e.g., cognitive, linguistic, socioemotional, or physical ) This should be a revised version of your unit 4 slides incorporating instructor feedback. 3. Toy Description : Descri be the novel toy you created including the dimensions and features of your final prototype . Include graphics and/or pictures. PSY201 Child Development Toy Project, Part 2: Final Presentation 4. Function/Developmental Relevance : What is the function of your toy? How does it work? How does your toy enhance any aspect of dev elopment? 5. Marketability : What is the target gender, age, location, and any other subject variables that apply? How is this toy necessary? How does it fill a void in the toy market? How is your toy an improvement over existing models already on the market? 6. Bias : Is there any bias associated with your toy? Address any bias issues relating to culture, gender, abilities/disabilities, etc. How could you modify your toy to meet the needs of other cultures, abilities/disabilities? 7. Conclusion : Provide concluding remarks including ideas for future product improvement. 8. Reference s (Slide) : This includes the three scholarly articles and any other resources used. Be sure to read the criteria by which your work will be evaluated before you write and again after you write. Toy Project PowerPoint Grading Rubric CRITERIA Deficient Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary 0 p oints 12 p oints Name and Aspect of Development Toy name and aspect of development not provided. Instructor feedback from unit 4 was not incorp orated . n/a n/a Toy name and aspect of development provided . Instructor feedback from unit 4 was incorp orated . 0-6 p oints 7-9 points 10 -11 points 12 p oints Literature Review Literature Review is absent or provides minimal and/or irrelevant information. Instructor feedback from unit 4 was not incorp orated . At least two relevant scholarly articles are discussed. Discussion provides some relevant background information on the area of development targeted; lacks significant details. Instructor feedback from unit 4 was somewhat incor porated . At least three relevant scholarly articles are discussed. Discussion clearly provides releva nt background information on the area of development targeted; lacks minor detail. Instructor feedback from unit 4 was mostly incor porated . At least three Relevant scholarly articles are discussed. Discussion clearly provides relevant, thorough background information on the area of development targeted. Instructor feedback from unit 4 was incor porated . 0-6 p oints 7-9 points 10 -11 points 12 p oints Toy Description Description is inadequate or missing. Description of toy includes some required elements. Description of toy includes all required elements; missing some minor detail. Description of toy includes dimensions, final prototype features, and function and operational details. Graphics and/or pictures are included. 0-6 p oints 7-9 points 10 -11 points 12 p oints Function/ Development al The function of the toy is not addressed The function of the toy is addressed, but Description is valid and insightful; Description is valid and insightful Relevance and/or the relevance to development is not provided or is unclear and illogical. the statement is somewhat unclear. The relevance to one or more aspects of development is unclear, lacks logic, and is not thoroughly justified. missing some minor detail. completely supported with details. 0-6 points 12 p oints Marketability Missing or does not address all the questions. n/a n/a Addresses all questions. 0-6 p oints 7-9 points 10 -11 points 12 p oints Bias Missing or inadequate. Potential biases are presented. Modifications are provided but are not appropriate. Potential biases of toy are presented. Appropriate modifications are suggested. Missing some detail. Potential biases of toy are thoroughly analyzed and discussed. Appropriate modifications are suggested and justified. 0-6 p oints 7-9 points 10 -11 points 12 p oints Conclusion Conclusion statement is missing or inadequate. Conclusion statement lacks some detail, clarity, or relevance. Clear and relevant conclusion statement with follow -up ideas for future toy improvement that are not all feasible. Clear and relevant conclusion statement with feasible follow – up ideas for future toy improvement. 0-9 points 10 -12 points 13-15 points 16 points Clear and Professional Writing and APA Format Errors impede professional presentation; guidelines not followed. Significant erro rs that do not impede professional presentation. Few errors that do not impede professional presentation. Writing and format are clear, professional, APA compliant, and error -free.