dq 2 2 responses to students

This requires a substantive, referenced written response demonstrating an understanding of the concepts being discussed. Respond to (2) students responses in a substantive way. Your responses should contribute scholarly to the discussion by challenging a position, providing additional support, or taking the debate in a new but reasonable direction. “Me too” responses are unacceptable; open dialogue creates an opportunity to engage with and learn from your fellow course participants.

DQ #1

Read Ashforth and Anand’s (2003) article. What insights does it provide regarding corruption in organizations? What recommendations would you offer organizations fearful of this possibility?

Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. In R. M. Kramer & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 25, pp. 1-52). Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier.

DQ #2

If you were advising an organization, what would you advise them regarding virtual or remote workers? Consider affiliation motivation, accountability and performance evaluation for this response.

Dahlstrom, T. R. (2013). Telecommuting and leadership style. Public Personnel Management, 42(3), 438-451. doi: 10.1177/0091026013495731

Hill, C. A. (1987). Affiliation motivation: People who need people… but in different ways. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 1008-1018. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.1008

Wiesenfeld, B., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (2001). Organizational identification among virtual workers: the role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. Journal of Management, 27(2) 213-230.

******I will post student responses by Wednesday October 31.********