viktor frankl reflection paper

Paper meets all requirements of assignment: It demonstrates clear fulfillment of assignment objectives; it adheres to required length of paper; it follows format specifications, including citation style, with few to no errors.

Paper meets most of the requirements of the paper and fulfills the principle objectives of the assignment. The paper may be slightly too short/long, but not to the paper’s overall detriment. The paper adheres to format requirements, including citation style, with few errors.

Paper meets some of the basic requirements of assignment, including assignment objective, length, and format, but may contain significant shortcomings in one or more of these areas.

Paper does not meet the requirements of the assignment in any way. It fails to fulfill assignment objectives; it is grossly too short/long; it makes no attempt to implement required format, including citation style.

Thesis statement lays out a clear, specific, arguable claim that governs the paper as a whole. It is nuanced and complex and takes an original stance on a topic.

Thesis statement is evident and clearly relates to the entire paper. It makes a specific, arguable, relevant claim but is not as nuanced or original as it might be.

Thesis statement is present and identifiable in the paper but is confusing, extremely vague, or unrelated to the paper as a whole.

Paper contains no thesis statement or thesis statement is unidentifiable.

Organization is excellent. Individual paragraphs and sections within the paper are clearly delineated and build on each other. Transitions are used deftly both between and within sentences, paragraphs, and sections.

Paper shows development of a basic structure, including sensible paragraph breaks, an introduction and conclusion, and use of simple transition words and phrases. There may be slight repetition or disorganization.

There is some organization, but numerous problems impede readability and clarity. Paper may lack paragraph breaks or may contain little or no differentiation of topic between paragraphs. Transitions may be completely missing or inaccurate.

Paper is entirely disorganized. Ideas and evidence contain no semblance of structure or order.

Paper contains few or no errors in grammar, mechanics, or punctuation. Paper has clearly been carefully edited and proofread. Word choice, clarity of expression are excellent.

Paper contains a few errors in grammar, mechanics, or punctuation, but these errors are not systemic and do not seriously impact the reader’s impression of the essay. Paper may need more proofreading or editing, but does show signs of grammatical care and consideration. Ideas are relatively clearly expressed.

Paper shows consistent errors in some areas of grammar, mechanics, and/or punctuation. Although these errors may not impede the reader’s understand of the essay, they are disruptive to the reading experience and suggest a lack of editing. Word choice may be poor is some places.

Grammar, mechanics, and punctuation in paper do not adhere at all to the standards of written academic English. Errors in this area of the paper seriously impede the reader’s ability to understand paper. Paper is extremely confusing to the point of incomprehensibility.

Reflection is insightful, engaging, complex, and relevant. Paper goes beyond the text to present ideas that are interesting to the reader.

Paper engages with the text with some originality and insight and displays a moderate level of critical thinking.

Reflection shows minimal insight.

Little to no attention or thought is given to the issue or the sources us